Black Atheists : No God Made Man, Man Apparently Made Gods!

Da Flash

Well-Known Member
PREMIUM MEMBER
Jun 10, 2007
379
387
H-Town!
Occupation
underpaid peon
Where science goes you not knowing any ithat gives pause to reason the existence of God or anything that grossly violates positions that are intrinsic to the atheistic worldview is common to the atheist mind. You frame what I'ves written to this point is a an assertion you can't relate to because it's a matter of my own thoughts, when in fact a number of findings are known around the world by millions. That is n exaggeration. Yet, you know of nothing or you conclude, by your reasoning any anomalous find can be considered one of a kind in the world, rather than the object of the science itself.
You don't know what I can and cannot relate to since you don't know me. The only things that you know about me is that I'm an atheist and that I'm probably Black! You are aware that an argument by popularity is a fallacious one, correct?
I have posted that to deal with me one must participate in the process. Therein, your thoughts will be challenged to meet the anomalous finds associated with the unfathomable characteristics of respective finds associated with some biblical assertions of God's work and evidence of phenomena that affirm biblical claims. One of those claims is spirit. The atheist mind is in a hole concerning spirit,.... and in responding to my writing you are all the way shott in concluding the Entity case was a preconceived class project. It was no purposed academic activity, it was a field investigation that yielded photographic evidence. Field investigations are not empirical research under highly controlled conditions subject to repeatability.

Because it has been my intent to draw you into a situation forcing your participation beyond you sitting in your easy chair unloading question after question after question your value and atheist mindset has engineered several falsities to justify your need to conclude I have no evidence but what exists in my mind. This is while you comfortably conclude you are in position to remain slothfully indulgent in atheism's denial of evidence. The atheist mind is deluded in that logic. Along with the Entity case revealing disembodied consciousness that takes the brain out of the loop of consciousness there is the evidence of the biblical God claim. One example is the appearance of a 3d holographic photographic image on a 2d non-photosensitive cloth that only appears on the front side of the cloth while being invisible on the backside of the cloth. Yet, you know nothing wanting to flood my mind with a million question the atheist mind drives in reverse when all the action is in drive. consequence of slothful indulgence in ignorance where phenomena beyond its means to explain
I don't have to participate "in the process" any more than you have to answer simple questions apparently! Involving the spirit now is like moving the goal post. You have been asked (by multiple people) for your evidence of a god, now you bring up the spirit, another thing that you cannot prove that we as humans have while avoiding answering!

No sir, your apparent inability to provide evidence is the issue here, not the atheists for questioning things that if they weren't part of a religion would be laughed at as pretty much crazy!

Once again, if we atheist are in denial, please point out how. There is a world of difference between denial and not accepting insufficient evidence!
 

frankster

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
Aug 3, 2014
852
129
I only suspected, but as you say.....he didn't clarify.
Astrocometman so far is being vague on details and guarded on stating his opinions or beliefs.
That's fine when one feels one is in an hostile territory....which he is.
It was his choice to bringing a direct challenge to Atheist in an Atheism board.....its called - Evangelism.
I am Not an Atheist.

The original sentence: "In every case, where science has had opportunity to test/research the findings are unlike any other in the world." jumped out to me as it seems to bear directly on the threads theme within the Atheist forum and it got to be kinda of an itch that bothered me for reason.........So I thought I'd just ask ya.
True....Ambiguous is one way that individuals who are uncertain of their idea tend to like to be
Nothing is wrong with being Cautious which is what he is trying to accomplish by being so
By coming here he should be More Vigilant and Forthright/ Candid than Circumspect.

IF the phrase had been used in that context.........very true.
True...I was given him a wide latitude
One cannot investigate an obscure idea or hypothesis

Now this disruptor out of here.
Sorry for the interruption.
I welcome your input no need to be sorry as your response is not seen by me as a interruption

Love All the Time
 

Astrocometman

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
Dec 6, 2013
60
5
Inglewood, California
You don't know what I can and cannot relate to since you don't know me. The only things that you know about me is that I'm an atheist and that I'm probably Black! You are aware that an argument by popularity is a fallacious one, correct?

I don't have to participate "in the process" any more than you have to answer simple questions apparently! Involving the spirit now is like moving the goal post. You have been asked (by multiple people) for your evidence of a god, now you bring up the spirit, another thing that you cannot prove that we as humans have while avoiding answering!

No sir, your apparent inability to provide evidence is the issue here, not the atheists for questioning things that if they weren't part of a religion would be laughed at as pretty much crazy!

Once again, if we atheist are in denial, please point out how. There is a world of difference between denial and not accepting insufficient evidence!
 

Astrocometman

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
Dec 6, 2013
60
5
Inglewood, California
You can equivocate as you please to avoid any fact with a lessor thought. You write

"You don't know what I can and cannot relate to since you don't know me. The only things that you know about me is that I'm an atheist and that I'm probably Black! You are aware that an argument by popularity is a fallacious one, correct?

I don't have to participate "in the process" any more than you have to answer simple questions apparently! Involving the spirit now is like moving the goal post. You have been asked (by multiple people) for your evidence of a god, now you bring up the spirit, another thing that you cannot prove that we as humans have while avoiding answering!"

I know that you cannot relate to spirit, having to duck anything that gives presence to the existence of God as an atheist. There is this default with the atheist mind that I have witnessed in one of the highest academic environments in America, the UCLA Neurpsychiatric Institute during the Entity Case. Atheist professors, academic deans, and researchers all, without exception refused to come see phenomenon were occuring at Dorisn Bither's home. St s distance they mocked reports of the field investigation, calling the observations hallucinations, BUT there were authenticated photos they refused to acknowledge. The atheist mind has all kinds of verbal machinations to not deal with what is effectively established by a preponderance of evidence. No one is avoiding answering what you call a simple question. You want to be in the driver's seat to easily satisfy the atheist passion of denial, especially where spiritual claims are involved. Immaterial beings do exist, the Entity case at least gives pause to reason.

I actual finds the atheist mind creates ways to deny. Now you are saying discussing spirit nis switching the goal post away from God as a topic, what do you think God having to be himself, a creature of this demension? Scripture says he is spirit, discussions about God are about spirit. You, like the atheists at UCLA did all to avoid what was in view in that investigation. You're doing the same thing in your load of assertions that I am avoiding your simple questions.n
 

Da Flash

Well-Known Member
PREMIUM MEMBER
Jun 10, 2007
379
387
H-Town!
Occupation
underpaid peon
You can equivocate as you please to avoid any fact with a lessor thought. You write

"You don't know what I can and cannot relate to since you don't know me. The only things that you know about me is that I'm an atheist and that I'm probably Black! You are aware that an argument by popularity is a fallacious one, correct?

I don't have to participate "in the process" any more than you have to answer simple questions apparently! Involving the spirit now is like moving the goal post. You have been asked (by multiple people) for your evidence of a god, now you bring up the spirit, another thing that you cannot prove that we as humans have while avoiding answering!"

I know that you cannot relate to spirit, having to duck anything that gives presence to the existence of God as an atheist. There is this default with the atheist mind that I have witnessed in one of the highest academic environments in America, the UCLA Neurpsychiatric Institute during the Entity Case. Atheist professors, academic deans, and researchers all, without exception refused to come see phenomenon were occuring at Dorisn Bither's home. St s distance they mocked reports of the field investigation, calling the observations hallucinations, BUT there were authenticated photos they refused to acknowledge. The atheist mind has all kinds of verbal machinations to not deal with what is effectively established by a preponderance of evidence. No one is avoiding answering what you call a simple question. You want to be in the driver's seat to easily satisfy the atheist passion of denial, especially where spiritual claims are involved. Immaterial beings do exist, the Entity case at least gives pause to reason.

I actual finds the atheist mind creates ways to deny. Now you are saying discussing spirit nis switching the goal post away from God as a topic, what do you think God having to be himself, a creature of this demension? Scripture says he is spirit, discussions about God are about spirit. You, like the atheists at UCLA did all to avoid what was in view in that investigation. You're doing the same thing in your load of assertions that I am avoiding your simple questions.n
Once again, a multitude of paragraphs with no evidence! You say that scripture says that god is a spirit? Who wrote the scripture and how do you know that it is accurate?? I haven't avoided anything nor have I asserted anything other than your god claim which I find unbelievable! This really isn't that hard. Present evidence for your belief or understand why someone who isn't part of the same belief system doesn't believe as you do!
 

Is Trump Going to Prison?

  • yes

  • no


Results are only viewable after voting.

Latest profile posts

Destee wrote on I_AM_HER's profile.
Peace and Blessings Beloved! Welcome Home! :yaay: :yaay: :yaay:
Please Ask God to bless me in finances and better circumstances. I'm trying to move forward with my life and a better career. I need prayer warriors out there to save a prayer for Clifford. I was staying with my folks during my time of studies
Top