You don't know what I can and cannot relate to since you don't know me. The only things that you know about me is that I'm an atheist and that I'm probably Black! You are aware that an argument by popularity is a fallacious one, correct?Where science goes you not knowing any ithat gives pause to reason the existence of God or anything that grossly violates positions that are intrinsic to the atheistic worldview is common to the atheist mind. You frame what I'ves written to this point is a an assertion you can't relate to because it's a matter of my own thoughts, when in fact a number of findings are known around the world by millions. That is n exaggeration. Yet, you know of nothing or you conclude, by your reasoning any anomalous find can be considered one of a kind in the world, rather than the object of the science itself.
I don't have to participate "in the process" any more than you have to answer simple questions apparently! Involving the spirit now is like moving the goal post. You have been asked (by multiple people) for your evidence of a god, now you bring up the spirit, another thing that you cannot prove that we as humans have while avoiding answering!I have posted that to deal with me one must participate in the process. Therein, your thoughts will be challenged to meet the anomalous finds associated with the unfathomable characteristics of respective finds associated with some biblical assertions of God's work and evidence of phenomena that affirm biblical claims. One of those claims is spirit. The atheist mind is in a hole concerning spirit,.... and in responding to my writing you are all the way shott in concluding the Entity case was a preconceived class project. It was no purposed academic activity, it was a field investigation that yielded photographic evidence. Field investigations are not empirical research under highly controlled conditions subject to repeatability.
Because it has been my intent to draw you into a situation forcing your participation beyond you sitting in your easy chair unloading question after question after question your value and atheist mindset has engineered several falsities to justify your need to conclude I have no evidence but what exists in my mind. This is while you comfortably conclude you are in position to remain slothfully indulgent in atheism's denial of evidence. The atheist mind is deluded in that logic. Along with the Entity case revealing disembodied consciousness that takes the brain out of the loop of consciousness there is the evidence of the biblical God claim. One example is the appearance of a 3d holographic photographic image on a 2d non-photosensitive cloth that only appears on the front side of the cloth while being invisible on the backside of the cloth. Yet, you know nothing wanting to flood my mind with a million question the atheist mind drives in reverse when all the action is in drive. consequence of slothful indulgence in ignorance where phenomena beyond its means to explain
No sir, your apparent inability to provide evidence is the issue here, not the atheists for questioning things that if they weren't part of a religion would be laughed at as pretty much crazy!
Once again, if we atheist are in denial, please point out how. There is a world of difference between denial and not accepting insufficient evidence!