- Feb 7, 2004
- 5,631
- 3,350
you focused on the wrong thing. Since it was about hair, I threw in the "economics" of it, the "health" issue of it and the "cultural, identity of it". This I did as a means of showing that it is way beyond the locks. Locks aren't the issue at all.
What I'm speaking on in relationship to the hair issue is too big to be about just locks. Like, what could we build with the 2.8 billion we're giving away to "look other than self ?"
How many of our sisters wouldn't be going "bald, exposed to cancer and other health issues just to look other than self ?"
In terms of identity...why do we push the subconscious message to our young that it's "OKAY" to look other than self?
I took it beyond locks, so why is it that "LOCKS" is all you saw ?
I'm confused...again ?
What I'm speaking on in relationship to the hair issue is too big to be about just locks. Like, what could we build with the 2.8 billion we're giving away to "look other than self ?"
How many of our sisters wouldn't be going "bald, exposed to cancer and other health issues just to look other than self ?"
In terms of identity...why do we push the subconscious message to our young that it's "OKAY" to look other than self?
I took it beyond locks, so why is it that "LOCKS" is all you saw ?
I'm confused...again ?