Discussion in 'Violators and Violations (Possible Ones)' started by jamesfrmphilly, Jul 3, 2013.
dude has become creepy.
She can't get away from him. That's creepy.
I don't need to know the details but if this person is harassing Sis. MsInterpret, then he needs to know his behavior won't be tolerated here and if it leads to a swift kick in the pants, then so be it!
Thanks for bringing this to the attention of the Moderators and Sis. Destee, Bro. James. That's good looking out for the members in this community.
i think we are not allowed to make another feel un welcome and THE-GOD is going out of his way to stalk her. i recommend banning.
He might be harassing that @ss! NP
I too tend to harass a little too hard too! No thanks to control!
Is it wrong that laughed a little too hard after clicking on that guy's profile and saw that he was following one member in particular?
How did I miss this? lmao.
Then we need an administrative definition and ruling on behavior that is defined as stalking, harassing, bullying, and fatal attractions.
Neither should be tolerated here as it isn't tolerated in the real world.
This behavior is not the same as someone who randomly makes a member feel un-welcomed. (IMHO)
I may have mis-spoke earlier by stating that I don't need to know the details of The-God's behavior, to deal with him. But that's how I tend to react when a woman is receiving un-welcomed advances from someone. I become mother lioness, protecting her family. (Although I still feel the same as I described earlier.)
Once the facts are known, then it's up to administration to handle it.
But, this could be a good example of a case brought before the Judicial board that was under discussion a week ago.
Brother James ... i aint seen a violation from Brother THE-GOD ... and i look for 'em.
I've called him on them, and would not hesitate doing so again, if there was one.
But i aint seen it ... show me ... what did he say or do that was in violation?
stalking is not a violation?
Separate names with a comma.