Information is constantly being captured and controlled, and today --in this time period of this era-- it is being dished out to the population at full throttle. Intentionally. In the US, the media, is one of these major information bottlenecks/dispensaries (compare the situation of food corporations and the food crisis, to media corporations and the media crisis ... crisis most don't even know they have). The control of information/data is key. FYI: You brain is a computer. When it comes to who's guilty, who's innocent; who's good, who's bad, without certain information, the person/people deciding on the case --which can be a whole country, or even a judge and jury-- can only come to certain conclusions/verdicts. This is known by everyone who keeps/controls information (the secret has been out for centuries), especially those who control American's sources/dispensaries or information, but not known to a large percent of those who consume/process that information -- Americans. Go ahead and look for the following information to be mentioned and/or debated on Television or some other form of media (even though if it were, the statements and debate would be controlled). With this information, I am only trying to shine light on others who should be prime suspects, I'm not trying to prove their guilt. La Toya Jackson: 'They murdered my brother' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFPjFyfcj8E dick gregory video about Michael Jackson http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HluEtIMI0VY Michael Jackson The ANGRY BLACK MAN! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OBUgE6EDFo (the audio gets louder around 1:28) Michael Jackson's speech against Tommy Mottola http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBv3GzD97FY --It looks like MJ was about to do something about the known and allowed and ongoing part of the music industry -- artists in the music industry being used and robbed by those involved in their music career. I say this because, in another video, which may not be included here, he alludes to this same thing again. You Don't Know The REAL MJ pt 1 of 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip_-Dhljn2Q consp2.wmv (You Don't Know The REAL MJ pt 2 of 3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X69uRLr8Lag You Don't Know The REAL MJ pt 3 of 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-l5U1g4Bz4 TOMMY MOTTOLA ON MICHAEL JACKSON'S UNREALISED SONGS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sItXxlQEmMs Latoya Jackson Saying Michael Jackson WAS Murdered http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hmKYn6zHQE THE MUSIC INDUSTRY EXPOSED - Why the Illuminati killed Michael Jackson (Part 9/11) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6znfH43kHsk LaToya Jackson Indicates Michael was Murdered, Pt1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e8LPrYiT38 -- Why is it his duty to disprove? In addition, Michael was not an addict. See the video: "Michael Jackson's Nurse on Larry King CNN" below. LaToya Jackson Indicates Michael was Murdered, Pt2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJjJ1f3pBec Immediately after his death, I think it was the TV show "Extra," or one similar, said how coming up next they were going to talk about Michael blah, blah, blah, and they were going to talk about the rare skin condition he had which turned his skin white. I was like "What!" And that's because since I can remember, ALL those shows, and pretty much all the media, never said he had vitaligo; and always made it seem like Michael was lying. Always. I came across this next video which compliments what I just said. Michael Jackson Died Abandonded And Alone : Opportunism Rear's It's Ugly Head !!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86hy12alPXw Think back to the Martin Bashir documentary "Living With Michael" http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/living-with-michael-jackson/. This interview made Michael, and his family, look horrible. Soon after that, MJ and his people released a documentary, which aired on TV, showing footage that had been cut out of the Martin Bashir interview. It showed beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Martin Bashir interview was edited in order to be misleading (in order to lie/deceive). This documentary showed Martin Bashir was a dishonest snake. It proved that Michael and his family was intentionally made to look horrible. It was so night and day; I couldn't believe what I was seeing. But what happened in America, that is, how did it effect the majority of American people, the media, and the government? There was complete silence! Not a thing was said by anyone! Not one discussion! It was as if it wasn't even shown! Both documentaries were on network TV, and MJ's documentary was hosted by Maruy Povich! More than a few thousand people had to have seen it. Most of the media had to have know about it? And still, nothing. Absolutely nothing! So, what does that say about the media? What does that say about the majority of people in America? FYI: The majority of people are never going to wake up, they will always be robots. It's dangerous, and up to you if you follow anything the majority does/says. Soon after this, what became of Martin Bashir? He got hired to MSNBC, to be on camera! He showed his face! They showed his face! That in itself says a lot. That actually says too much. That's more than icing on the cake, that's a whole other cake. After Martin Bashir's appearance and revelation of employment with MSNBC, what was said? What was done? Not a thing! And that's the icing for that second cake. *This whole Martin Bashir story/situation you just read may have occurred that way because he did a job for someone, and got rewarded for it. It's the same thing that occurs when members of government do favors for corporations. Quote: Martin Bashir (born 19 January 1963) is a British journalist and media personality, currently with NBC News as a contributor for its Dateline program, and an afternoon anchor for MSNBC, hosting Martin Bashir. He was previously an anchor for ABC's Nightline ... Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Bashir Corporate owned media during US war-time/illegal occupation-time benefits greatly from war, just like most of the government, banks, other corporations, and wealthy civilians. One example of this intentionally overlooked conflict of interest in regards to corporations is General Electric's holdings: http://www.freepress.net/ownership/chart/main If you take a look at their some of their Media holdings, you'll see that MSNBC is one of them. Now, click on "Other" to see some of their war machine contributions as one of the America's top 10 defense contractors. They have every reason to support war, and every reason to oppose those who condemn war. Please view 0:00 - 4:20 Now, add Michael Jackson to that. MJ, going on tour preaching peace, "they don't care about us," and more during US war-time/illegal occupation-time? MLK "going on tour" preaching peace, "they don't care about us," and more during US war-time/illegal occupation-time? MSNBC, and war-loving, war-creating, war-desiring members of government, corporations and the media have much to gain from his death. They should be prime suspects. And that "accusation" is backed and proven to be credible and pertinent by the everyday practices of US law enforcement, private investigators, courts, and the government. Now, think back to the 80's. Michael Jackson purchased a tiger, a monkey, some other things; and was alleged to have purchased the Elephant Man's bones. The media was all over this. But think about it, these are the normal purchases of a multimillionaire. Think of what rich and famous whites were purchasing during that same time (you probably can't think of anything, because you weren't told anything; so, go research). I dare the media to speak on similar purchases made by rich and famous whites during that same time. If you had Michael's money, wouldn't you buy a monkey, or similar? Weren't almost all blacks during that time constantly doing things outside of the box/unique? What would happen if you combined one of those people, those blacks, with millions of dollars? What if you combined the trait of being highly creative to that same person? Would you get a person who purchased "weird things"? This is just one example of how almost everyone got seriously played by the media when it came to Michael. Most blacks included. "Wacko Jacko"? So, what was so odd about Michael? You don't know. (What is a Communist? You don't know.) Was it how gentle he was? Was it how child-like he was? As usual, the media turned nothing into something. It's similar to how the media persuaded the country to impeach Bill Clinton, but didn't do the same with Bush, and as a result Bush wasn't impeached. In the normal person's world, it was the people who chose; in the real world, the media got them, and members of government, to choose but didn't do the same with Bush, so Bush wasn't .... Was there character assassination when it came to Michael? I believe so. If you knew where you lived it's even likely that his vitaligo was intentionally caused. Crazy? So is this place you live in. Here is a former Fox News anchor stating that the Fox News Channel's stated practice was to "embarrass, humiliate, challenge, or disrupt whatever Jesse Jackson did" and that they were told on many occasions that Jesse was one of their targets: Please view 28:24 - 28:51 This couldn't have been done with Michael? Was this done with Michael? "embarrass, humiliate, challenge, or disrupt" are very similar to the words used in declassified COINTELPRO documents (COINTELPRO: counter intelligence program. A name given for a whole division of US intelligence special weapons and tactics -- sneaky weapons and tactics.): "The purpose of this new counterintelligence endeavor is to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities of black nationalist, hate-type organizations and groupings, their leadership, spokesmen, membership, and supporters, and to counter their propensity for violence and civil disorder." *Don't let the stated targets fool you; those same documents, and the Intelligence community's actions, proved otherwise. Think back to the 80's. Do you remember how popular MJ was? Wasn't he the most popular man on the planet? Wasn't he worldwide? Do you remember how fans would react to him? And he was a black man, and this was during the 80's! All of this means, for a fact, he was a threat to the white, power structure. It means he was being monitored. It also means he had to be, and was, contained and directed/steered. To think otherwise is to be told that a beautiful woman, dressed in sexy underwear, walked across a packed football stadium at half-time and she wasn't being watched. You don't have to be there to know (_ + 10 = 20). *Michael Jackson was similar to the Olympics in that he brought many different races, religions, and regions together. He must have been a great asset to the One World movement during the 80's, as the Olympic games were. Based on the statements and actions made by the media, police, and government, Suge Knight had Tupac killed because he was leaving Suge Knight's record label (Deathrow) and he was worth more to Suge Knight dead than alive. If Suge Knight had Tupac killed for those reasons; Sony, it's employee(s), owner(s), stockholders, board of directors, employer's of the board of directors, or head of the "gentlemens group" any of these aforementioned people belong to wouldn't have Michael killed? His death was caused by the injection of a drug at the hands of someone else (death caused by being drugged by someone else), and MJ, the person killed, had huge assets that were to be transferred upon death. They follow the money every day, all day, but not this day? Not enough suspicion to check down that road? Private road, no trespassing? Fact: The richer you are, the better you can have this type of crime covered up, and the better you can carry out a conspiracy to commit this type of crime. So, if Suge Knight .... Dr Conrad Murray tells his lies http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDlX7m2TBU4 -- Media defense of the doctor. Michael Jackson's Nurse on Larry King CNN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OisnE7SQUdw -- Maybe he couldn't sleep because he believed people were trying to kill him??? FYI: Not being able to sleep is torture, figuratively, and it is even used as torture literally. -- At certain points, Larry King seems to be deceptively forming conclusions for viewers. -- Subliminal: If you look closely at the images from 4:05 - 5:54, you'll see that it is a "piece on Michael's skin transformation." The baby incident, twice? Hundreds or thousands of images and videos of Michael, and they chose those. -- 7:06 - "The idea is that when you first start taking it, you do get sort of a high-type feeling ..." The "idea"? In most viewer’s minds, "the idea" = "the idea behind the drug being taken by someone or Michael." What else does it mean? Wrong word choice? -- 9:47 - "... either because of drugs or something else." not "because of something else." And if you think these types of statements are natural, and serve no hidden purpose, check this out: http://www.destee.com/index.php?thr...ctics-exposed-and-analysed.68160/#post-705638 Michael Jackson's nurse speaks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWl8d7OlmZE -- Once again, she states that she hasn't been interviewed by authorities/police/investigators. When key witnesses are not interviewed, and they are willing to and available, it means those in charge of the investigation desire the investigation to come to a certain conclusion. That's a fact, especially with popular people. Cherilyn Lee Follow-Up Interview with CNN's John Roberts http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnV2mrAM6l8 --For sleep. --7:39 - "Not to connect these two things together..." Come on ... By now, you should be able to see what CNN, in particular, was doing. Michael Jackson's Dermatologist: MJ Was A Diprivan Addict http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYAZHimRVaY --Misleading title. This video proves it was used for sleep. --Liar!!! Listen to what he said at 5:54 - 6:12 Now go back and listen to what he said at 4:02 - 4:15 So, while trying to present Michael as "drug addict," he messed up and showed that he himself is a liar who is lying about what he is saying. By now, you should definitely see what was going on with CNN. Why did they do this? FYI: I didn't intentionally get this many CNN clips. I didn't intentionally get CNN clips at all. *Different networks handle different individuals maybe? For instance, Fox News on Jesse Jackson; CNN on Michael? All depends on what was said and done on other networks when it came to these two individuals. WHY Did Michael Jackson's Doctor Hide Bottles Of Lidocaine As Paramedics Tried To Revive Him? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwvCG1T2cZk --For certain, Dr. Murray is a liar! !!DOCTOR BROKE AWAY FROM GIVING MICHAEL JACKSON CPR TO HIDE DRUGS!! 3/24/10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_AZM_-8cjA Dr. Conrad Murray Was Talking on Phone to Waitress as Michael Jackson Was Dying!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2XV2mjnNIU -- He's someone who can be bought. -- 4:26 - 4:33 "No, not at all." She didn't know he had 7 kids and was married. Nancy Grace July 22 P 4 Michael Jackson Case ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU1ZVpfnt2s -- 2:04 - 2:14 The doctor came at night and left first thing in the morning? Helping MJ sleep through the night? Nancy Grace July 22 P 5 Michael Jackson Case ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MNsE3mB494 Hold on, it gets worst. There Where More Snakes Around Michael Who Stood To Benefit. A hit squad moving in slow motion? (Which would be correctly termed an "assassin squad.") People behind michael jackson's death Part 1/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9ioHxOLdZQ People behind michael jackson's death part 2/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oywAo2qufH4 People behind Michael jackson's death Part 3/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIlq9u2lG84 People behind michael jackson's death Part 4/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1KS-3A1ry0 People behind Michael Jackson's death Part 5/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Km5TAA9vyZo Quote: On June 26, the LA Times reported that a Jackson “adviser”, Tohme, had stated that while Jackson had picked Dr. Conrad Murray as his physician, AEG “paid the doctor’s bills”. On July 22, according to Insider.com, AEG Live stated that “Michael Jackson insisted” AEG hire Dr. Murray and that Murray was “Jackson’s personal physician”. According to BittenandBound.com, Murry had been Jackson’s physician for three years and that Murray had been hired by AEG to be with Jackson “full-time”. The contract would also provide details about the personal physician hired by AEG. In this case, AEG has admitted it was Dr. Murray. AEG stands to lose a considerable sum over the series of concerts Jackson failed to perform. There’s been no news that AEG has sought to recoup its losses by way of filing an insurance claim, a claim, that if AEG was telling the truth, that Jackson had passed a medical exam with “flying colors”, should be legit. If it’s ascertained that Jackson’s death was caused by Dr. Murray’s actions, AEG, as Murray’s employer, could face a potentially massive wrongful death lawsuit from Katherine Jackson. Source: http://mjthekingofpop.wordpress.com...eg-live-attempts-to-muzzle-katherine-jackson/ Other sources of information: http://www.justice4mj.com/news/tag/aeg http://articles.latimes.com/2009/may/31/entertainment/et-michael-jackson31 http://www.mj-777.com/?s=Tohme+Tohme Are those involved in this current court case going to look into who benefits, or who could have had the doctor do it? To do so would mean to do what the courts, police, FBI, and investigators do to the average American, you, all the time in court (it's standard procedure). I bet they won't do it. And even if they did, it would be a total farce. That's American "justice" for you, proven to serve those with money and power.