(Music Producer) - The Paut Neteru
Sphere 0, would be the spookism you refer to.
It is the Sphere where GOD manifests I AM.
no, please do not destroy the teachings of the metu neter to reflect your spookism. sphere 0 isn't a mystery god speaking to a prophets. the metu neter teaches of a path to self realization where anyone can attain divine self-realization, and that realization is never this super being you are advancing.
and you are confusing sphere 1 with sphere 0. sphere 0 is completely unmanifest. sphere would be i am. however, the mystery god "is not".
(Music Producer) - That is the only Sphere that I am drawn to, the Sphere of Consciousness. I no longer have an interest in derivatives of Sphere 0, nor do I do that anymore.
you claim this mystery god involves itself in the physical, and manifests in the physical. a direct contradiction.
you claim that there is only one god yet "anyone" can attain realization of this sphere 1 and thus godhood, or be on the cusp of godhood. directly contradicting your flat monotheistic doctrine.
(Music Producer) - So we agree that the author of the Metu Neter never says anything against the GOD manifested in the Holy Scriptures or Old Testament?
page 67, take a close look. he is completely mocking the mystery god portrayal of your god that manifests and demanifests. he classifies your thinking as european right there, separating god from man and the creation...etc.
exactly the opposite of what you claim.
ra un nefer amen is forced to coin the term syntheism as he does not want the kemetian understanding of the universe to be confused with your flat monotheism. that is how bad the abrahamic doctrine is. the man coined a new term to distance the doctrine from the abrahamic ideas. you'll notice on page 51 that he states monotheism in kemet existed 1000 years before akhenaten.
you will notice that when he discusses the gods and what each identification means, aten has no place. the great god amun is covered on numerous occasions, aten isn't even mentioned in vol 1; and only in scorn in volume 2.
the metu neter contradicts your doctrine.
(Music Producer) - It is claimed and proven that Akhenaten (an ancestral spirit Pharaoh! of Kemet) and his authorized priesthood wrote the Holy Scriptures.
akhenaten is not relevant. your theory as to the original source of abrahamic monotheism is interesting. i maintain that the documents were likely corrupted when they were appropriated in the narrative of king josiah; so if akhenaten was the original author the documents were likely corrupted at that point.
either way it is a false doctrine. the only real question is "how false?".
i found the references you alluded to regarding the claims that nubians continued to practice kemitian spiritual practices in secret; and on that same webpage is where the claim that the spirits of the ancestors of kemetian spirits sought out ra un nefer amen is.
Sphere 0, would be the spookism you refer to.
It is the Sphere where GOD manifests I AM.
no, please do not destroy the teachings of the metu neter to reflect your spookism. sphere 0 isn't a mystery god speaking to a prophets. the metu neter teaches of a path to self realization where anyone can attain divine self-realization, and that realization is never this super being you are advancing.
and you are confusing sphere 1 with sphere 0. sphere 0 is completely unmanifest. sphere would be i am. however, the mystery god "is not".
(Music Producer) - That is the only Sphere that I am drawn to, the Sphere of Consciousness. I no longer have an interest in derivatives of Sphere 0, nor do I do that anymore.
you claim this mystery god involves itself in the physical, and manifests in the physical. a direct contradiction.
you claim that there is only one god yet "anyone" can attain realization of this sphere 1 and thus godhood, or be on the cusp of godhood. directly contradicting your flat monotheistic doctrine.
(Music Producer) - So we agree that the author of the Metu Neter never says anything against the GOD manifested in the Holy Scriptures or Old Testament?
page 67, take a close look. he is completely mocking the mystery god portrayal of your god that manifests and demanifests. he classifies your thinking as european right there, separating god from man and the creation...etc.
exactly the opposite of what you claim.
ra un nefer amen is forced to coin the term syntheism as he does not want the kemetian understanding of the universe to be confused with your flat monotheism. that is how bad the abrahamic doctrine is. the man coined a new term to distance the doctrine from the abrahamic ideas. you'll notice on page 51 that he states monotheism in kemet existed 1000 years before akhenaten.
you will notice that when he discusses the gods and what each identification means, aten has no place. the great god amun is covered on numerous occasions, aten isn't even mentioned in vol 1; and only in scorn in volume 2.
the metu neter contradicts your doctrine.
(Music Producer) - It is claimed and proven that Akhenaten (an ancestral spirit Pharaoh! of Kemet) and his authorized priesthood wrote the Holy Scriptures.
akhenaten is not relevant. your theory as to the original source of abrahamic monotheism is interesting. i maintain that the documents were likely corrupted when they were appropriated in the narrative of king josiah; so if akhenaten was the original author the documents were likely corrupted at that point.
either way it is a false doctrine. the only real question is "how false?".
i found the references you alluded to regarding the claims that nubians continued to practice kemitian spiritual practices in secret; and on that same webpage is where the claim that the spirits of the ancestors of kemetian spirits sought out ra un nefer amen is.