Black People : Men are smarter than women, according to a controversial new study

Discussion in 'Black People Open Forum' started by dandan, Jan 4, 2007.

  1. dandan

    dandan Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4
    Men are smarter than women, according to a controversial new study that adds another cinder to the fiery debate over whether gender impacts general intelligence.

    “For 100 years there’s been a consensus among psychologists that there is no sex difference in intelligence,” said J. Philippe Rushton, a psychologist at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

    Recent studies, however, have raised questions about the validity of this claim, he said. One such study showed that men have larger brains than women, a 100 gram difference after correcting for body size. Rushton found similar results in a study of gender and brain size.

    To determine if there was a link between gender and intelligence, and perhaps between brain size and intelligence, Rushton and a colleague analyzed the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores from 100,000 17- and 18-year-olds.

    G-factor

    When Rushton and colleagues weighted each SAT question by an established general intelligence factor called the g-factor, they discovered that males surpassed females by an average of 3.6 IQ points.

    The g-factor works like this. “If I tell you the last four digits of my telephone number and ask you to repeat them back to me, that’s a low g-loaded memory test,” Rushton explained. “But if I then ask you to repeat them back to me in the reverse order, that suddenly requires a tremendous amount more cognitive processing. It is a very high loaded g-item.”

    So the g-factor “is really the active ingredient of the test,” Rushton said. “It’s the single best, most predictive part of the test.”

    Rushton suspects that the results are due to males having more brain tissue than females on average. “It’s a very reasonable hypothesis that you just need more brain tissue dedicated to processing high ‘g’ information,” Rushton said.

    The study, which Rushton co-wrote with Douglas Jackson, also of the University of Western Ontario, is detailed in the current issue of the journal Intelligence.

    Flawed conclusion

    Bruce Bracken, a psychologist at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia, who was not involved in the new study, said he thinks Rushton and Jackson make a convincing argument for the sample they used.

    “The difference appears to be real,” Bracken said.

    But he questions the team’s conclusions. “I believe that the differences probably lie in the variables they hadn’t considered,” Bracken said.

    One plausible explanation is that more females than males decide to go to college and thus take the SAT test. The study did in fact include about 10,000 more females than males.

    “This suggests that more males are deciding to do something else,” Bracken said. “It may be that the males who would not have scored as high on the SAT chose not to take it, and they chose another route.”

    A more reliable study, he said, would be to match each male with a very similar female and then compare the results.

    The debate goes on

    The findings add fuel to a still smoldering debate ignited by former Harvard President Lawrence Summers, who stated early last year that males have a higher intrinsic aptitude in science and engineering.

    In a letter from Summers days after his controversial statements, he wrote: “Despite reports to the contrary, I did not say, and I do not believe, that girls are intellectually less able than boys, or that women lack the ability to succeed at the highest levels of science. As the careers of a great many distinguished women scientists make plain, the human potential to excel in science is not somehow the province of one gender or another.”

    While Rushton called his results significant, he doesn’t think they are a basis for uprooting the field of education.

    “I don’t think it has any real implications for education policy or schoolwork,” he said. “In fact, females actually get better grades than males.”

    Plus, he doesn’t think the IQ difference would show up in everyday activities. “For the vast majority of people in the vast majority of jobs, it really doesn’t translate into very much,” he said.

    But when it comes to Nobel Prize winners, he said that men could outnumber women 10-to-1. “Where it will really show up is at the very high end of the distribution,” Rushton said.

    Rushton has left the door open for opposing views and findings that might contradict his new study.

    “I wouldn’t say it’s the last word. We really do need more research on it before we can be absolutely certain,” Rushton said.

    http://www.nlaq.com/2007/01/04/men-smarter-than-women-scientist-claims/
     
  2. OmowaleX

    OmowaleX Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,414
    Likes Received:
    39
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Educator
    Location:
    Aztlan
    Ratings:
    +42
    :rolling:
     
  3. vandella

    vandella Banned MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    TRAVEL INDUSTRY
    Location:
    FLORIDA
    Ratings:
    +0
    THERE HE GOES AGAIN , SMDH.:rolleyes:

    :playball: @ CHILD-LIKE KNEEGROWS
     
  4. Kemetstry

    Kemetstry going above and beyond PREMIUM MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Messages:
    20,976
    Likes Received:
    5,248
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Chemist
    Location:
    Detroit
    Ratings:
    +6,137

    :dance: :thinking: :lift: Cant argue with scientific facts !!!! :thinking: :lift: :dance:
     
  5. $$RICH$$

    $$RICH$$ Lyon King Admin. STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2001
    Messages:
    69,983
    Likes Received:
    3,978
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    BUSINESS owner
    Location:
    Da~WINDY*CITY //CHICAGO
    Ratings:
    +4,178
    how true is that , not really women in past has proven to be brighter more
    alert and deeper into education then men , so how true is that study !?
     
  6. PurpleMoons

    PurpleMoons Administrator STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,146
    Likes Received:
    1,097
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +1,102

    Sister Vandella, I know it's frustrating when dealing with the matters of the heart, but please Sister, remain from getting personal.


    Thank you
    :heart:
     
  7. Edward Williams

    Edward Williams Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    58
    Occupation:
    Produce Justice
    Location:
    Right here!
    Ratings:
    +58
    More non-sense to keep black males and black females oppositional...rather than appositional.

    SEX is Male and Female

    Get it right or fall prey to racial population control.

    Next are you gonna tell me that males are so smart they should be together? F**k that anti-SEX.
     
  8. PurpleMoons

    PurpleMoons Administrator STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,146
    Likes Received:
    1,097
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +1,102
    Interesting article! :thinking:

    However, I would have to say, the test are definately inconclusive. When considering the functions of the left and right sides of the brain, and how each processes information for a particular task; Both is definately needed to produced a more balance and accurate outcome.

    Most non-whites wants us to believe that science and math measures the highest degree of intelligience, when in fact it doesn't. One could be excessively knowledgeable in science and math, but lack the ability to access information in other areas.

    The keyword here is "balance."

    Men are not genetically smarter than his female counterpart and women are not genetically smarter than her male counterpart. Both is necessary to create a balance thats detrimental to run a smooth operation.

    http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/dominance/index.htm
     
  9. OmowaleX

    OmowaleX Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,414
    Likes Received:
    39
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Educator
    Location:
    Aztlan
    Ratings:
    +42
    Hmm...

    So, it's obvious that YOU cannot respect my opinion without name callings.

    So far you have referred to me as ...KNEEGROW, childish, weak,
    etc.

    For what, in some cases just posting a smiley.

    How mature does that make you?

    The more that you react in this manner, the more you weaken your own arguments due to your lack of RESPECT ( as you have displayed in CHAT), so as I suggested before, perhaps you should IGNORE my posts because your REACTION will not silence me.
     
  10. OmowaleX

    OmowaleX Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,414
    Likes Received:
    39
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Educator
    Location:
    Aztlan
    Ratings:
    +42

    Yet, this is what SOME Black women constantly do. In a state of perpetual SELF-DENIAL and they resort to lashing out and name calling whenever one of us or any of us, Black MEN, dont agree with the MYTHS perpetrated against US.

    So, if my disagreeing with the "conventional wisdom" makes me a "childish, immature, weak ***, whining, kneegrow" then so be it.

    :lol:
     
Loading...