i get what you are asking, but yes, i am vaccine free in that i haven't had a vaccination for anything in a few decades or more. i've been fortunate to live in an environment where such is less likely to be required. with all the stuff that this world has, there should be a much better balance of infrastructure to promote healthy living. sick minds that would allow such an imbalance have shown that they are sick enough to do lots of stuff that no one would/could imagine anyone doing to anyone else. i'd be nervous to entrust my child[ren] to such a mindset.
Are you Vaccine free? and if you have a child is your child Vaccine free? pls do some research on Malaria then get back to me.
don't need to do research; malaria is a BadThing(TM). that's a given. better "treatment" for the disease would be a very GoodThing(TM).
even better would be an environment that is a lot more resistant to malaria in the first place. there's lots of money and knowledge around this planet. it is most inappropriate that any child, or adult, human lacks for anything. reason notwithstanding, any organism that does this to itself is really very very sick.
with that particular evidence before the court, would the court entertain the possibility that "something" might "happen" to some of these
20,000 African children? was nothing learned of trials conducted on the 4,000 since 2003? are African children the only ones susceptible to malaria? are there any other children, anywhere else at risk that might also benefit from the "free" treatments during these trials?
My point is if they wanted us all dead we all we'll be dead (blacks around the world)
if one turns the water up slow enough, one can boil a live frog ... or a human.
no one can escape been vaccinated, its either required by law (depending on where u live) or done as a safety precaution.
regardless of where one lives, one should have the security of knowing that one is safe from long known diseases. if not by inoculation, then by reason of the "cleanliness" of one's environment. and "because it's 'the law' ..." has gotten quite a few of us sometimes rather messily dead.
The issues isn't about trust, it's about throwing the baby out with the bath water.
there is the issue of an effective malaria vaccine. this would be nice. but there is also an issue of trust; there is plenty of proven reason to a least look at that consideration, yes?
Lets look at all the facts before making assumption e.g could they be using African scientists?
wouldn't it be a wonderful world where we just
knew that there were in fact African medical scientists/teams/facilities involved, being "used", or even directing the research! sadly, given the degree of "trust" that "they" have repeatedly told us that we should extend to them again this time, ("honest, that was an isolated incident. it won't happen again ..."), i'd really like to consider that they might be using African scientists. ... er ... are they?
i just feel it would be good to get an idea of what has been found with the first 4,000 over the last 5 years (other than a sense that research could be taken to the next level). i'd also like to know if some of that additional 16,000 could spread the joy of being guinea pigs amongst other children to be sure that this works on all children that could be at risk of malaria. why 20,000
African children? can't somebody else's babies share this risk too? or are our children just especial in some capacity?