JESUS & Claims of Homosexuality Many other texts of the Bible were available that were just as valid, often very much more so, than those which made it into the “Holy Books”. Texts were rejected, destroyed or rewritten to fit the official line and the philosopher, Celsus, wrote of the Church leaders in the third century: “You utter fables, and you do not even possess the art of making them seem likely…You have altered three, four times and oftener, the texts of your own Gospels in order to deny objections to you”. Roman historian Dio Cassius as support and supplemental information about his sexual taste. Dio C states: “though he (Domitian) himself entertained a passion for a eunuch named Earinus, nevertheless, since Titus also had shown a great fondness for eunuchs, in order to insult his memory, he forbade that any person in the Roman Empire should thereafter be castrated” (Roman History 67.2.3 or see http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/67*.html Cassius Dio — Epitome of Book 67 penelope.uchicago.edu Why bring up Domitian & Titus? Because Jesus was in part a composite figure of the two. In 1958, a manuscript was discovered at a monastery at Mar Saba, east of Jerusalem, which shows how the Jesus story was rewritten by the church whenever it suited them at the time. It was found by an American, Morton Smith, professor of Ancient history at Columbia University, and it included the content of a letter by bishop clement of Alexandria, Egypt, an early Christian father, to a colleague called Theodore. It also revealed an unknown segment of Mark’s Gospel which had been suppressed. It included in the Jesus story some details of mystery school initiations and it was an account of the raising of Lazarus by Jesus, the famous raising of the dead. In this suppressed text Lazarus called to Jesus before any raising took place, so proving that he was not supposed to be physically dead. There was also another devastating revelation for Christianity. The manuscript makes references to the effect that Jesus was understood to have engaged in possible homosexual practices involving the “rich young man” mentioned in Mark’s gospel 14:51. Let me stress that I’am not condemning homosexuality here. Good luck to those who wish to live their lives in this way so long as it’s the choice of all concerned. Iam making the point that the Christian hierarchy have been deceiving and lying to their followers right from the start. Bishop Clement’s letter was replying to a Christian who was very perturbed to be told the above story of Jesus by the gnostic group called the Carpocrates (Basilides was the father of Carpocrates and he knew Titus and Vespasian who are coded as the father & son in the 4 Gospels) It had apparently been leaked to them by an official in Alexandria. Clement’s advice, after confirming the story, was that anything which contradicts the official church view must be denied, even if it is true. The letter says to those who question official orthodoxy: “For even if they should say something true, one loves the truth should not, even so agree with them…to them one must never give way; nor, when they put forward their falsifications, should one concede that the secret Gospels is by Mark-but should deny it on oath. For not all true things are to be said to all men”. See David Icke’s The Biggest Secret p.116 When I first read this 15 years ago in 2000 I didn’t believe it I just thought it was propaganda against Christianity. But when I learned that Jesus Christ was just a composite figure of historical and mythological people I came on board to the truth. One composite of Jesus was Titus and he was known to be Bi-sexual. He had an affair with Bernice, a NT character (Acts 25:23) and was forced to break up his relationship with his musical troop who were inverts and eunuchs. Titus was one of the three frogs in (Rev 16:13-16) exposed naked with little boys in Mark 14:51. Acharya S (D.M. Murdock) expands more on the content of the letter in her book The Christ Conspiracy p. 291: “Clement repudiates the Gnostic-Christian sect of the Carpocratians and outlines secret scriptures that evidently had been originally in the gospel of Mark, Chapter 10 and contained “an account of raising of a young man from the dead, a rite of initiation, and a brief excerpt of an encounter between Jesus and three woman. In response to Theodore’s questions, clement relates the contents of this “Secret Gospel of Mark as follows: “And Jesus being angered, went off with her into the garden where the Tomb was, and straightway a great cry was heard from the tomb. And going near Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of the tomb. And straightway going in where the youth was, he stretched forth his hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the youth loved him and began to beseech him that he might be with him…after six days the youth comes to him, wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night for Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom”. Joe Atwill relates in his books Caesar’s Messiah & Shakespeare’s Secret Messiah that it was Titus in the garden without his Armor (naked) and that a sexual innuendo was implied with Lazarus being at the Table. Well we know Titus was gay and his military campaign was a parody of Christ ministry. The Supreme Court should be alerted that the pending cases related to Christians wanting to discriminate is without merit because the character known as Jesus was Bi-sexual. And it should be noted that Jesus 40 days in desert being tempted with stone/bread or sex was Typology of Moses 40 days on mountain abstaining from sex and not exposing him himself by walking on stones/Balls. And the golden Calf they made turned into a golden ***/ donkey of Jesus in a manger (a box of hay for horses/mules). So that the miracle of his birth is related to John the Baptist mother being barren and Jesus being born of a mule that was sterile was vicious black comedy propaganda of the Romans especially Titus who was the son of the Mule driver (Vespasian). Peter (Satan) is made to bare the cross on his shoulders (Luke 23:26) Just like the Donkeys were in genesis 49:14-15 was Issachar (Iscariot) a rawboned (frame of the mouth) Donkey from which Jesus gets the mouth of Judas Iscariot kiss of a scorpion too. Then we see Jesus/Titus son of the Mule drive Triumphal entrance story that he has for “*****” is actually to transport the Passover meal of the butchered *** Lazarus/Christ. For he was born in an *** and he dies with the transport of ***** See your King comes to you Righteous and having salvation Gentle and riding on a donkey, On a colt, the foal of a donkey (Zech 9:9) The Typology is true while else have Lazarus/Christ anointing head be worth more than 300 denarii? (Mark 14:5). During a famine a donkey (***) was worth 80 shekels=4 denarii=1 Shekel =320 denarii (2 Kings 6:25). Notes: “There was a great famine in the city: the siege lasted so long that a Donkey’s head sold for eighty shekels…As the King of Israel was passing by on the wall, a woman cried to him, help me, my lord the King! The King replied, “If the Lord does not help you, where can I get help for you? From the threshing floor? From the winepress. Then he asked her, what’s the matter? She answered, This woman said to me, ‘Give up your son so we may eat him today, and tomorrow we’ll eat my son. So we cooked my son and ate him. The next day I said to her, Give up your son so we may eat him, but she had hidden him”. When the king heard the woman’s words he tore his robes…underneath he had sackcloth on his body” (2 Kings 2: 25-30) So two sons were supposed to be eaten but only 1 was eaten. So half of the total meal was eaten. When we get to the War of the Jews the encircled wall of Titus results in famine where Mary of the house of Hyssop eats half of her Baby. Lets link the winepress Typology with Christ/Lazarus in the NT from Joe Atwill’s Caesar’s Messiah 171-173 Jesus description in the passion of the garden of Gethsemane/Mount Olives is a lampoon of his giving of his blood, which he described as wine where great drops of blood falling to the ground (Luke 22:42-44) like liquid squeezed from grapes or in a press… This vegetative theme, regarding a Messiah captured in a garden named olive press or winepress is a parody of Rome’s mock Messiah did not crush his enemies like grapes in a wine press but rather was pressed and pruned in Mount of Olives in a garden named Gethsemane, a word that means olive press”. When the king heard the woman’s words he tore his robes…underneath he had sackcloth on his body”. The last part of this is the same as Jesus/Titus being caught with a certain young man naked without a linen cloth in the Garden of Gethsemane (Mark 14:49-53) And don’t forget his death is associated also with the Donkey (Satan) threshing Corn (Jesus) all having precedents of Typology (character based upon another characters in the OT bridge to the NT.