Brother AACOOLDRE : Jesus & accusations of Homosexuality

Discussion in 'AACOOLDRE' started by AACOOLDRE, Apr 13, 2015.

  1. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,445
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    JESUS & Claims of Homosexuality

    Many other texts of the Bible were available that were just as valid, often very much more so, than those which made it into the “Holy Books”. Texts were rejected, destroyed or rewritten to fit the official line and the philosopher, Celsus, wrote of the Church leaders in the third century:

    “You utter fables, and you do not even possess the art of making them seem likely…You have altered three, four times and oftener, the texts of your own Gospels in order to deny objections to you”.

    In 1958, a manuscript was discovered at a monastery at Mar Saba, east of Jerusalem, which shows how the Jesus story was rewritten by the church whenever it suited them at the time. It was found by an American, Morton Smith, professor of Ancient history at Columbia University, and it included the content of a letter by bishop clement of Alexandria, Egypt, an early Christian father, to a colleague called Theodore. It also revealed an unknown segment of Mark’s Gospel which had been suppressed. It included in the Jesus story some details of mystery school initiations and it was an account of the raising of Lazarus by Jesus, the famous raising of the dead. In this suppressed text Lazarus called to Jesus before any raising took place, so proving that he was not supposed to be physically dead. There was also another devastating revelation for Christianity. The manuscript makes references to the effect that Jesus was understood to have engaged in possible homosexual practices involving the “rich young man” mentioned in Mark’s gospel 14:51. Let me stress that I’am not condemning homosexuality here. Good luck to those who wish to live their lives in this way so long as it’s the choice of all concerned. Iam making the point that the Christian hierarchy have been deceiving and lying to their followers right from the start. Bishop Clement’s letter was replying to a Christian who was very perturbed to be told the above story of Jesus by the gnostic group called the Carpocrates. It had apparently been leaked to them by an official in Alexandria. Clement’s advice, after confirming the story, was that anything which contradicts the official church view must be denied, even if it is true. The letter says to those who question official orthodoxy:

    “For even if they should say something true, one loves the truth should not, even so agree with them…to them one must never give way; nor, when they put forward their falsifications, should one concede that the secret Gospels is by Mark-but should deny it on oath. For not all true things are to be said to all men”.

    See David Icke’s The Biggest Secret p.116

    When I first read this 15 years ago in 2000 I didn’t believe it I just thought it was propaganda against Christianity. But when I learned that Jesus Christ was just a composite figure of historical and mythological people I came on board to the truth. One composite of Jesus was Titus and he was known to be Bi-sexual. He had an affair with Bernice, a NT character (Acts 25:23) and was forced to break up his relationship with his musical troop who were inverts and eunuchs. Titus was one of the three frogs in (Rev 16:13-16) exposed naked with little boys in Mark 14:51.

    Acharya S (D.M. Murdock) expands more on the content of the letter in her book The Christ Conspiracy p. 291:

    “Clement repudiates the Gnostic-Christian sect of the Carpocratians and outlines secret scriptures that evidently had been originally in the gospel of Mark, Chapter 10 and contained “an account of raising of a young man from the dead, a rite of initiation, and a brief excerpt of an encounter between Jesus and three woman. In response to Theodore’s questions, clement relates the contents of this “Secret Gospel of Mark as follows:

    “And Jesus being angered, went off with her into the garden where the Tomb was, and straightway a great cry was heard from the tomb. And going near Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of the tomb. And straightway going in where the youth was, he stretched forth his hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the youth loved him and began to beseech him that he might be with him…after six days the youth comes to him, wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night for Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom”.

    Joe Atwill relates in his books Caesar’s Messiah & Shakespeare’s Secret Messiah that it was Titus in the garden without his Armor (naked) and that a sexual innuendo was implied with Lazarus being at the Table. Well we know Titus was gay and his military campaign was a parody of Christ ministry. The Supreme Court should be alerted that the pending cases related to Christians wanting to discriminate is without merit because the character known as Jesus was Bi-sexual. And it should be noted that Jesus 40 days in desert being tempted with stone/bread or sex was Typology of Moses 40 days on mountain abstaining from sex and not exposing him himself by walking on stones/Balls. And the golden Calf they made turned into a golden ***/ donkey of Jesus in a manger (a box of hay for horses/mules). So that the miracle of his birth is related to John the Baptist mother being barren and Jesus being born of a mule that was sterile was vicious black comedy propaganda of the Romans especially Titus who was the son of the Mule driver (Vespasian).

    Peter (Satan) is made to bare the cross on his shoulders (luke 23:26) Just like the Donkeys were in genesis 49:14-15 was Issachar (Iscariot) a rawboned (frame of the mouth) Donkey from which Jesus gets the mouth of Judas Iscariot kiss of a scorpion too. Then we see Jesus/Titus son of the Mule drive Triumphal entrance story that he has for “*****” is actually to transport the Passover meal of the butchered *** Lazarus/Christ. For he was born in an *** and he dies with the transport of *****

    See your King comes to you

    Righteous and having salvation

    Gentle and riding on a donkey,

    On a colt, the foal of a donkey (Zech 9:9)

    The Typology is true while else have Lazarus/Christ anointing head be worth more than 300 denarii? (Mark 14:5). During a famine a donkey (***) was worth 80 shekels=4 denarii=1 Shekel =320 denarii (2 Kings 6:25).
     
  2. frankster

    frankster Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2014
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +133
    The following is not to be seeing as a support or denigration of homosexuality or any form of sex, but just an explanation of different times and social values.

    The term or definition which we now accept as that of being homosexual, is probable different from what was understood by the people of Roman times. The closest estimation to our understanding of homosexuality and Roman understanding of that form of sexuality is that of a Catamite (Ganymede) - the passive or receiving partner.

    It is My understanding that in Roman times, sex between males where not considered homosexual only effeminate behavior was.
    For hence it was not David that was considered perverse in the pederasty relationship he had with Jonathan.
    Similarly in the case of Jesus it would appear that he may have had sexual relations with one of his disciples and a young man in which case he would not be the passive partner. Back then it would make a lot of difference but today that distinction is of little consequence...... given today's definition of homosexuality
     
  3. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,445
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    I dont know what difference there was. I man penis in another anus no diffirent in ancient times than now. If you go to Black columist section. Read 2 essays I wrote on the three frogs of revelations I get more deeper into it
     
  4. frankster

    frankster Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2014
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +133
    Is a man's penis in a woman anus homosexual ?
     
  5. frankster

    frankster Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2014
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +133
    Can't go to Black columist right now so please present your point.
    A man's penis in another man anus is Sodomy not necessarily just homosexuality.
    Often in times of war and in Roman times sodomy was used to emasculate the vanqusihed
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - Jesus accusations Homosexuality
  1. AACOOLDRE

    Brother AACOOLDRE : Jesus and the accusations

    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    107
  2. AACOOLDRE
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    43
  3. Chevron Dove
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    134
  4. Al D
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    167
  5. Clyde C Coger Jr
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    257