This is exactly as I thought. You made an assumption and posted a response without asking for clarity. When your error was pointed out to you, you then accuse me of assuming but can't state an assumption. We can only interpret your response as a failed ad-hominem because you really didn't have anything meaningful to contribute to the conversation. I didn't make any statements about anyone's intelligence on my initial post. My post speaks to the definition of an atheist and how that only makes sense in a Eurocentric context. When I provide a little of the argument that supports this stance, instead of addressing the argument, you personalize and try to attack the man (ad-hominem). This is a clear sign that you don't have anything intelligent to add. And I therefore digress with speaking with you any further and open it up to others who have something meaningful and intelligent to add to this discourse.