Law Forum : In a possible prelude to Federal charges, Black Twitter goes in on Dwight Howard over 16yr old girl.

Discussion in 'Law Forum - Prisons - Gun Ownership' started by skuderjaymes, Jun 6, 2014.

  1. skuderjaymes

    skuderjaymes Contextualizer Synthesizer MEMBER

    Country:
    Japan
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,757
    Likes Received:
    5,870
    Occupation:
    independent thoughtist thinker, context linker
    Location:
    theory to application to discussion to percussion
    Ratings:
    +6,043
    16 Year Old Girl Puts Dwight Howard On Blast, Claims To Be Side Chick

    [​IMG]

    A 16 year old girl that goes by the name of Deborah (Debbie) took to Twitter today to put Dwight Howard on blast, claiming to have had some type of romantic involvement with the NBA star. She claims the two conversed via text and he even flew her out a few times, calling her his "Princess". She never makes any mention that the two had any thing sexual going on but I guess the little princess is lucky he had a vasectomy before she let him put his sword in her stone and she have a whole kingdom of babies running around.


    Read more: http://www.balleralert.com/profiles...logPost:1816845&page=3#comments#ixzz33pwxksah
     
  2. HODEE

    HODEE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    4,912
    Likes Received:
    613
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    (RF) Technician
    Location:
    ( Alonewolf ) California.. by way of the LOU
    Ratings:
    +795
    She looks 16 Dwight is in trouble.
     
  3. Asomfwaa

    Asomfwaa Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,399
    Likes Received:
    2,558
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2,564
    If true, DH and Debbie were two confused people. Clearly Debbie lacked insight into Men, accepting money, gifts and traveling arrangements. Clearly DH lacked insight into Teenagers, forgetting Debbie may not have the insight in Men many of us would otherwise think she would.

    Although, to his credit, if he has any, she reports that he never knew her age. One comment on the site said he should not go for 16 as he can get 18.

    Still, I don't know how much fault one can put on a Man who does not know a woman's age--or even who is deceived about a woman's age. I.e. if the woman is an unwilling sexual partner and finds statutory rape an issue, why does she only mention her age after the fact? It's possible he never asked so she never told, but as she reveals her age out of anger, it's clear she concealed her age throughout the whole ordeal.

    Now granted, some 16 look and act 16; but some 16 don't. I 'acted' older and sometimes 'looked slightly' older. When 16 'looking slightly' older means looking 17, 18, 19, 20 . . ..
     
  4. skuderjaymes

    skuderjaymes Contextualizer Synthesizer MEMBER

    Country:
    Japan
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,757
    Likes Received:
    5,870
    Occupation:
    independent thoughtist thinker, context linker
    Location:
    theory to application to discussion to percussion
    Ratings:
    +6,043
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    man.. everybody can see this girl is a kid.. and if you take a look at some of Dwight's baby mamas, you'll see that a few of them look really young.. as in.. he likes the youngins.. stunted development.. any dude with 9 babies and 8 babies mamas is automatically suspect... guilty til proven innocent..
     
  5. info-moetry

    info-moetry STAFF STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,724
    Likes Received:
    6,428
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    A+ technician
    Location:
    The rotten Apple
    Ratings:
    +6,486
    If he is guilty, so are her parents. ...
     
  6. Deacs

    Deacs Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    534
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +567
    There are two trains of thought due to age...
    The first is that dude should obviously peruse women close to his age. This is predatory in nature to take advantage of or be in a relationship with someone so young or basically lacking the maturity...

    The second is law. It depends on the time the relationship started and the states which she was transported into. But in many states the legal age of consent varies... with some being on the edge of 16. So if this is indeed new and it started when she was 16 and was in a state covered by the consent laws, then it won't be considered statutory rape...

    But still this is some chester da' molester level garbage.
     
  7. skuderjaymes

    skuderjaymes Contextualizer Synthesizer MEMBER

    Country:
    Japan
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,757
    Likes Received:
    5,870
    Occupation:
    independent thoughtist thinker, context linker
    Location:
    theory to application to discussion to percussion
    Ratings:
    +6,043
    how so?
     
  8. skuderjaymes

    skuderjaymes Contextualizer Synthesizer MEMBER

    Country:
    Japan
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,757
    Likes Received:
    5,870
    Occupation:
    independent thoughtist thinker, context linker
    Location:
    theory to application to discussion to percussion
    Ratings:
    +6,043
    The State only matters for the State offense.. But Transporting a minor across state lines for sexual activity is a Federal offense. I read somewhere that the girl was 15 at the time.. and he also transported her friends.. and that puts them into play as well.. so if this is real.. he could be facing charges from 2 States and also Federal charges..

    18 U.S. Code § 2423 - Transportation of minors
    a) Transportation With Intent To Engage in Criminal Sexual Activity.— A person who knowingly transports an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any commonwealth, territory or possession of the United States, with intent that the individual engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.
    (b) Travel With Intent To Engage in Illicit Sexual Conduct. A person who travels in interstate commerce or travels into the United States, or a United States citizen or an alien admitted for permanent residence in the United States who travels in foreign commerce, for the purpose of engaging in any illicit sexual conduct with another person shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
    (c) Engaging in Illicit Sexual Conduct in Foreign Places.— Any United States citizen or alien admitted for permanent residence who travels in foreign commerce or resides, either temporarily or permanently, in a foreign country, and engages in any illicit sexual conduct with another person shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
    (d) Ancillary Offenses.— Whoever, for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, arranges, induces, procures, or facilitates the travel of a person knowing that such a person is traveling in interstate commerce or foreign commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
    (e) Attempt and Conspiracy.— Whoever attempts or conspires to violate subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d) shall be punishable in the same manner as a completed violation of that subsection.
    (f) Definition.— As used in this section, the term “illicit sexual conduct” means
    (1) a sexual act (as defined in section 2246) with a person under 18 years of age that would be in violation of chapter 109A if the sexual act occurred in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States; or
    (2) any commercial sex act (as defined in section 1591) with a person under 18 years of age.
    (g) Defense.— In a prosecution under this section based on illicit sexual conduct as defined in subsection (f)(2), it is a defense, which the defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant reasonably believed that the person with whom the defendant engaged in the commercial sex act had attained the age of 18 years.


    ( http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2423 )

     
  9. info-moetry

    info-moetry STAFF STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,724
    Likes Received:
    6,428
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    A+ technician
    Location:
    The rotten Apple
    Ratings:
    +6,486
    She's a minor and if he's flying her here and there, the parent (s) must know and give permission, no?

    It even looks like there was another minor in the room when she walked into the room in one of the pictures. ..
     
  10. skuderjaymes

    skuderjaymes Contextualizer Synthesizer MEMBER

    Country:
    Japan
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,757
    Likes Received:
    5,870
    Occupation:
    independent thoughtist thinker, context linker
    Location:
    theory to application to discussion to percussion
    Ratings:
    +6,043
    yeah.. but that doesn't make them guilty of a crime. It makes them look irresponsible.. but that's won't land them in the Penitentiary.. truth is.. it won't even land him in the pen unless they can prove he had or tried to have sex with the girl. It's not illegal to be in a hotel room with young girls..
     
Loading...