Yeah, and I have an MBA. Neither degree has anything to do with this subject, so spare me the irrelevancy. The research i've done is from the words of the CRT folks themselves. Views they themselves have written. Perspectives CLEARLY influenced by their marxist and postmodernist miseducation. You claimed I knew nothing about research My claim is you don't know black history. This topic was discussed in the 60s
If CRT is really what its defender claim its about, speaking the truth about American racism, and how it affects conditions today, no theoretical perspective would be needed. Just the inclusion of more data about things like for example redlining and how it results in less black home ownership today. No THEORY is needed. But the real thing that crt is about is to indoctrinate folks into seeing every system through a lens of a marxist oppressor-oppressed dynamic, that exists inherently, regardless of wheather individuals in the system are racist. And that everywhere there is a group disparity, racism is THE culprit. This doesnt stand to logical scrutiny and the only reason it has gotten traction in academia is because they see it as setting the table for an assault on the capitalist system down the road. Which is what we've asked for. True history incorporated in history and social studies classes. All else is a white red herring! They don't want the truth taught.
Got nothin to do with advancing blacks. BS! Nothing in CRT will actually help blacks in the real world one bit. And the sneaky folks behind it dont have an interest in seeing blacks actually advance. They're only interested in riding our troubles to their own ends More proof you know not of what you speak!!!!