Black People Politics : Hillary: Secret History of Democratic Party

This is still not enough for me to vote for Trump--ever. He could be running against a skunk and he couldn't get my vote. For me, it's more than what the party represents historically and has a lot to do with the individual and the words coming out of his mouth. And all the words, not just the way he changes them to fit the temperament of the polls.

With so many people who support hate crimes following him, many of them mentally unstable, he's a far more dangerous choice for Black people to make than just the economy or foreign trade.

When your own party hates you, you know you have a problem.

I definitely don't want him having the authority to fill our next vacant SCOTUS positions or leading the most powerful military in the world. He's juvenile and highly emotional, not to mention narcissistic. I simply can't feed that white man's ego when he doesn't give a hoot about Black people. Republicans...remember, that's Rudy Guiliani's party and don't think for a moment, with all of his race baiting speech, he's not vying for a seat in Trump's cabinet and both are from New York? Oh hayell no!!

The damage that a person like Trump would do to this nation, would set Black people back 200 years and I'm not going there quietly.


Well said NNQueen, well put indeed.

...

 
Well said NNQueen, well put indeed.

...
Okay, however I hope that everyone will still view the documentary-movie Hillary. Then we'll have the full picture between the Democrat conspirators and the "juvenile". I challenge what is more dangerous, people who use race to move forward a social engineering agenda and vote getting or an ego centered being who actually believes he can make a better difference. How will it end with Trump as President? I'm just saying I will rely on all the other Republicans around him for a buffer. And if we don't see that movie, we don't have all the information for a clear vision. If after seeing that history up through the Clintons if any still votes for her it will be rather Amazing, because I'd rather have Bernie. At least he is a principled man. Even if he wants to spread your money around.:referee:
 
...

Rather than respond to the person I quoted, why not answer this post, willa :

https://destee.com/threads/hillary-secret-history-of-democratic-party.87236/#post-960584



Okay, however I hope that everyone will still view the documentary-movie Hillary. Then we'll have the full picture between the Democrat conspirators and the "juvenile". I challenge what is more dangerous, people who use race to move forward a social engineering agenda and vote getting or an ego centered being who actually believes he can make a better difference. How will it end with Trump as President? I'm just saying I will rely on all the other Republicans around him for a buffer. And if we don't see that movie, we don't have all the information for a clear vision. If after seeing that history up through the Clintons if any still votes for her it will be rather Amazing, because I'd rather have Bernie. At least he is a principled man. Even if he wants to spread your money around.:referee:
 
Last edited:
No, not even a possibility willa,

Clearly, King's geographical statement of "Dark Ages" had nothing at all to do with the american constitution, it references a specific timeline in history.

But this is what happens when you don't click and read the link offered willa, your reply comment will always miss the point. For example the article contains this basis of fact:

:facepalm:

"... Leaving aside the fact that the so-called “Dark Ages” was itself an era largely brought about by western white males and true “Caucasians,” there are other dangers to be found in King’s revisionist history, which champions the superior role of “white people.” Did he forget that Rome had “black” emperors or that early Christian churches had numerous African bishops and writers who shaped Christendom? Septimius Severus and many of the Roman rulers in the 3rd century CE were in fact of African descent. (cont.)..."

Screen-Shot-2016-07-22-at-5.45.03-PM.png


Portrait of Septimius Severus, a Roman emperor of African descent, with his Syrian wife, Julia Domna, and two children, Geta [later erased] and Caracalla. (Like their father, they were also of African descent.) Painted on wood in Egypt c.200 CE, but now in the Antikensammlung in Berlin. (Image via Wikimedia.)


"... His comments also raised a lot of questions and concerns among historians who have pointed out that the idea of “Western Civilization” is itself a fiction of the late 19th and early 20th century ..."


...
This is the only statement that I have a particular thought for that "Western Civilization is itself a fiction of the late 19th and early 20th century…" I consider America a Western Civilization not Rome who no doubt had Black government within it. And since we are a record keeping nation and there are those people in the U.S. who have kept journals that go along with government records, I'd say there was Abraham Lincoln and a Civil War in the 1800s which stopped the South from succeeding and brought about the abolition of slavery. England being the first to ban slaver ships from coming into harbor.

The 1900s had America in a WWII and Dr. Kings marches that changed America's white thinking about race and Southern racist laws. He was a superior spiritual man. That is why White people have his statues all over the place and named streets, arenas, airports after him. I see no fiction of historical events. Therefore Dr. King expands the name list of Black men, plus there are Black women who took their place in shaping this country as well.
 
...

At the end of the day, the point is that King doesn't know his history :facepalm:

Take care, see you next time, willa.


This is the only statement that I have a particular thought for that "Western Civilization is itself a fiction of the late 19th and early 20th century…" I consider America a Western Civilization not Rome who no doubt had Black government within it. And since we are a record keeping nation and there are those people in the U.S. who have kept journals that go along with government records, I'd say there was Abraham Lincoln and a Civil War in the 1800s which stopped the South from succeeding and brought about the abolition of slavery. England being the first to ban slaver ships from coming into harbor.

The 1900s had America in a WWII and Dr. Kings marches that changed America's white thinking about race and Southern racist laws. He was a superior spiritual man. That is why White people have his statues all over the place and named streets, arenas, airports after him. I see no fiction of historical events. Therefore Dr. King expands the name list of Black men, plus there are Black women who took their place in shaping this country as well.
 

Donate

Support destee.com, the oldest, most respectful, online black community in the world - PayPal or CashApp

Latest profile posts

HODEE wrote on Etophil's profile.
Welcome to Destee
@Etophil
Destee wrote on SleezyBigSlim's profile.
Hi @SleezyBigSlim ... Welcome Welcome Welcome ... :flowers: ... please make yourself at home ... :swings:
Back
Top