- Apr 7, 2013
- 6,131
- 2,933
Thanks. I read the study group forums thread link. I will keep out of the Atheist study group. I still contend my question was as respectful as all get out. Like I said, I asked it of 2 atheists before. While they were surprised at the question, each took it in the spirit in which it was asked, i.e., as food for fodder rather than you're attacking me! The ONLY reason I asked in the first place was because it occurred to me that my humanity was shaped by my religious beliefs in God; that I am a higher being precisely because I have a soul. Animals don't have souls, ergo, without a soul, I would be on the exact same level as the meanest, vermin-filled rat scuttering about in the gutter. No better. No worse.
It could have occurred to me but it DIDN'T: "but I would be no better in the scheme of things than a catepillar!" No, the rammifications of being an atheist, i.e., "no better/no worse" than any creature on earth, conjured up a stronger image in my mind, something not so "innoculous" as a catepillar, but a creature most black people revile. My thought, my reason for asking the question was to UNDERSTAND how my uber-intelligent atheist friends (one is a professor of economics) dealt emotionally with NOT being highest on the food chain, a place consigned us solely by religious belief. Science does not say humanity is the highest biological form that exists. Again, it is a place consigned us SOLELY by religious belief, i.e., belief in God.
Since both of my friends are former believers, I was curious as to how, in DISbelief, they reconciled themselves - emotionally, intellectually, howeva - to their loss of primacy in the animal world, to being of no more significance than a rat in the gutter.
And, if as self-proclaimed atheists they were NOT reconciled to animal-equality, i.e., to being no better/no worse than any creature, by what authority did they feel on a higher level than other animals.... than ANY animal.
Henceforth, I'll keep the hard questions to myself.... and out of forums where the ONLY people who can answer them "study."
Thank you very much for taking the time to give me the heads up.... and, stay out.
It could have occurred to me but it DIDN'T: "but I would be no better in the scheme of things than a catepillar!" No, the rammifications of being an atheist, i.e., "no better/no worse" than any creature on earth, conjured up a stronger image in my mind, something not so "innoculous" as a catepillar, but a creature most black people revile. My thought, my reason for asking the question was to UNDERSTAND how my uber-intelligent atheist friends (one is a professor of economics) dealt emotionally with NOT being highest on the food chain, a place consigned us solely by religious belief. Science does not say humanity is the highest biological form that exists. Again, it is a place consigned us SOLELY by religious belief, i.e., belief in God.
Since both of my friends are former believers, I was curious as to how, in DISbelief, they reconciled themselves - emotionally, intellectually, howeva - to their loss of primacy in the animal world, to being of no more significance than a rat in the gutter.
And, if as self-proclaimed atheists they were NOT reconciled to animal-equality, i.e., to being no better/no worse than any creature, by what authority did they feel on a higher level than other animals.... than ANY animal.
Henceforth, I'll keep the hard questions to myself.... and out of forums where the ONLY people who can answer them "study."
Thank you very much for taking the time to give me the heads up.... and, stay out.