Black People : Harlem Fraud by Tony Brown (the t.v. journalist)

Discussion in 'Black People Open Forum' started by solomon7, Mar 23, 2006.

  1. solomon7

    solomon7 Banned MEMBER

    Mar 8, 2006
    Likes Received:
    A Passage From



    From the moment that the Rev. Martin Luther King was shot on the
    Memphis hotel balcony, conspiracy theories arose. But in the history
    of Black and White relationships in this country, there are many
    other incidents in which insidious forces have endeavored to thwart
    self-sufficiency and economic development in the Black Community.

    In most history books, the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s is
    heralded as a triumphant period in which Black culture was finally
    and fully recognized.
    Let me offer you a different perspective: It was
    an artistic and political fraud.
    The Harlem Renaissance was a smoke
    screen in which Black art and artist were used by elitist Blacks and
    their White manipulators to divert the Black masses from their
    growing efforts to become self-reliant.

    This theory that the Harlem Renaissance was a counterfeit cultural
    movement was developed by a Black historian David Levering Lewis. He
    described it as a "forced phenomenon organized by the Black and White
    leaders of the Black protest movement..."38 Lewis has noted that at
    the time many Black advocates of self-sufficiency such as Marcus
    Garvey saw through a "renaissance" that was largely staged and
    manipulated by outside forces interested in distracting Blacks from
    far more important matters.
    Garvey wrote that White liberals in the
    NAACP were "disarming, dis-serving, dis-ambitioning and fooling the
    Negro to death."

    Garvey and others recognized that the Harlem Renaissance was mostly
    subsidized by Jewish liberals, whether mis-guided or
    purposeful. "Nothing could have seemed to most educated Afro-
    Americans more impractical as a means of improving racial standing in
    the 1920s than writing poetry and novels or painting,"40 Lewis has

    Even the elitist assimilationist W.E.B. Du Bois, who hated Garvey and
    worked to discredit him, came to realize just how corrupt and vulgar
    Black elitism and its Renaissance charade had become. Lewis recounts
    Du Bois's exasperated recantation: "Although is own magazine had
    helped promote the {Harlem Renaissance} movement, Du Bois came to
    disapprove of a racial program offering poetry in the place of
    politics and Broadway Musicals in the place of jobs."

    Many of its participants later considered the Harlem Renaissance more
    a rich White man's trendy adventure into Black bohemia.
    Harlem writer
    Claude McKay lamented that "the Harlem Renaissance movement of the
    artistic' 20's was really inspired and kept alive by the interest and
    presence of white bohemians. It faded out when they became tired of
    the new plaything."

    The Harlem Renaissance was designed as a fatal distraction for Blacks
    to be diverted from the fact that the very sponsors of the Harlem
    Renaissance had just destroyed the head of the largest Black mass
    movement in history, Marcus Garvey
    , and the most viable vehicle that
    Blacks had, no matter how immature, for Black economic development.

    However, the aristocrats' fatuity cut them off from their own
    reality. The Harlem Renaissance demonstrated the extremes the
    Talented Tenth (ten thousand of ten million Blacks in 1920) went to
    in using rank-and-file Blacks as a footstool for the advancement of
    certain colored people.
    They felt entitled to this privilege because
    they descended from either free Blacks or Whites or both. They
    developed separate institutions such as the American Negro Academy,
    headed at one time by Du Bois for intellectuals and exclusive social
    clubs like the Mu-So-Lit in Washington, D.C., the Agora in Nashville,
    and the Crescent in Cincinnati.

    Out of this elitism grew the conceptual bias for noneconomic
    socialism: the belief that the vast majority of the Black population
    was not biologically (because they were dark-skinned) or
    environmentally (because they lived in squalor) capable of competing
    economically and educationally with White people.

    Du Bois and his Talented Tenth minions were guided by this philosophy
    as the assumed command of the Black community. Naturally, as
    noneconomic socialism dictates, they advocated dependence on White
    people and the government.
    This antieconomic policy of "the better
    class Negroes" worked successfully for the well-educated Talented
    Tenth, which had four or five generations of freedom and often a
    college education at the turn of the twentieth century. Failure, of
    course, became an inevitability for the common people; it devastated
    and underdeveloped the largely down-and-out Black masses who had been
    freed from slavery for only one generation or less.
    In effect, this
    treachery of elitism and non-economic socialism re-enslaved Black
    people. And it does to this very day.