Brother AACOOLDRE : Hair of the Lamb's wool: Roman Wig

Discussion in 'AACOOLDRE' started by AACOOLDRE, Jan 20, 2014.

  1. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,444
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    THE HAIR OF A LAMB’S WOOL:
    Wigs IN ANCIENT ROMAN TIMES

    The general public needs to be informed when they are being deceived. Most people assume that Jesus (Christ) was black because he had hair of wool from a lamb and feet of bronze burnt in an oven (Rev 1:14). But what if the description was referring to a white dude who ruled Rome and wore a woolen wig and had red Bronze feet known as hammer toes. According to the dictionary Bronze is Reddish brown. The Roman historian Suetonius describes Domitian as ruddy (Red) and Bald headed.

    Domitian was very sensitive about his baldness and wrote a manual called Care of the Hair. All the prostitutes that found themselves in his bed he would pull their hair out. Rev 9:8 may refer to Domitian again with other men having women’s hair.

    Due to the nature of hair and the relatively wet climate in the upper reaches of the Empire, there are very few examples of wigs that survive to this day. We do know that women wore wigs whether they were bald or not. So too did men, Emperor Otho wore a wig, as did Domitian. Wigs allowed women to better achieve the kind of 'tall' styles that particularly punctuated the Flavian and Trajanic eras (e.g. the periods of 69-96 and 98-117 CE).


    There were two types of wig in Roman times, the full wig, called the capillamentum, and the half wig, called the galerus. The galerus could be in the form of a fillet of woolen hair used as padding to build an elaborate style, or as a toupee on the back or front of the head.

    So what do we have here. We have Domitian being inserted in Revelations as a Christ when he was Ant-Christ or anti- Jewish helping his ruling family kill more than a million Jews from 66-95AD.
     
  2. cherryblossom

    cherryblossom Banned MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,252
    Likes Received:
    5,505
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +5,560
    Revelation 1:

    [9] I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.
    [10] I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,
    [11] Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea.
    [12] And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;
    [13] And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.
    [14] His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;
    [15] And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.
    [16] And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp two-edged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.
    [17] And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last:
    [18] I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.
    [19] Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter;
    [20] The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.
     
  3. cherryblossom

    cherryblossom Banned MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,252
    Likes Received:
    5,505
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +5,560
    And why would John write of Domitian making him "a Christ" when John was one of those persecuted under Domitian?

    Rev. 1:
    [9] I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ
     
  4. cherryblossom

    cherryblossom Banned MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,252
    Likes Received:
    5,505
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +5,560
    What about the LOCUSTS?


    Revelation 9:
    [3] And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.
    7] And the shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men.
    [8] And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions.
    [9] And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle.
    [10] And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months
     
  5. Kemetstry

    Kemetstry going above and beyond PREMIUM MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Messages:
    20,941
    Likes Received:
    5,245
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Chemist
    Location:
    Detroit
    Ratings:
    +6,127
    sigh

    The common men of the day did not wear, nor could they afford such wigs. Jews, especially did not wear them





    .
     
  6. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,444
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    To see the relationship between jesus and titus or revealations and domitian , all that is needed is to view jesus ministry as a parody as it relates to the war between the roman's and jews. symbols long thought to have been based on christian love may really be images of roman conquest. while many of the connentions between jesus and titus are difficult to see. titus military campaign has a conceptual outline parallel to jesus ministry. the same with paul letters and revelations to domitian.

    please read "caesar's messiah" by joeseph atwill and his documetary film on youtube.
     
  7. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,444
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    Thank you for your interest in “Caesar’s Messiah

    Below is a free report written by joseph Atwill, the author of “Caesar’s Messiah”, which reveals the true Identity of Jesus Christ.

    The most important discovery presented in my book “Caesar’s Messiah is that Jesus Christ is a composite fictional literary character and not a historical person. In Greek-the language in which the Gospels were original written-Jesus mean Savior and Christ means the Messiah, and the title of Christ was already familiar to Jews (Being applied to King David, Cyrus etal), long before the supposed time of Jesus. Further, there’s never been any archaeological evidence of Jesus Christ that had ever been discovered-the only way we really know about this individual is through the Gospels=which in Greek means Good news of military victory.

    Though the Gospels seem to be a history they are actually anti-History of the true military-messianic movement of the Maccabee’s and their offshoots of the Zealots and Sicari gangs that fought and lost to Rome. The Gospels are written in the style of a genre of fictional literature called Typology. Typology is simply creating stories by basing one character upon another character from a different time, place and story-much like an archetype but the keystone to the arch of the deception is Titus. Once someone understands that the Gospels are Typological literature, it is easy to see that virtually every episode of Jesus ministry was based upon events that occurred during the Roman Caesar Titus’s military campaign through Judea.

    The typology linking Jesus to Titus in the gospels is not especially hard to spot and the fact that it has been overlooked for 2,000 years is inexplicable. A blind man could see Flavius Josephus’s War of the Jews and the Gospels as DNA related like a father to a son. This oversight is particularly strange in that the Gospels set up a direct connection between Jesus and Titus with prophecies concerning the Son of Man.

    While Christians believe that the character in the Gospels was divine, this is not what Jesus Christ actually claimed. Jesus never said that he was the Messiah, and in fact went out of his way to avoid saying so. Jesus stated that the “Son of Man”-a title for the Jewish messiah that comes from the prophecies of Daniel-would come before the generation he spoke passed away. Since Jews of this era saw a generation as lasting forty years, what Jesus was claiming was that the Son of Man would appear within forty years from the date of his death on Passover 33CE. Jesus also made clear predictions as to what would happen when the Son of Man came. He prophesied that during the Son of man’s visitation Galilean towns would be destroyed, Jerusalem would be encircled with a wall, and the Temple would be razed.

    In trying to make sense out of what Jesus said, Christians have interpreted this visitation by the Son of Man as the “second coming of Jesus Christ. But there is a major problem with this belief-Jesus didn’t show up within the time span he predicted. Christians have tried to get around this problem by claiming that Jesus would come sometime in the future, but this clearly illogical. Jesus was very precise that the Son of Man would come within forty years from his ministry. So who was the Son of Man that Jesus predicted and Christians have worshiped for 2,000 years? The true name of the Christ the Messiah –is Titus Flavius.

    The only person in history who accomplished the predictions that Jesus made concerning the Son of Man-and he did it precisely within the given time frame-was Titus Flavius. So the Gospels is nothing but a parody, satire of the military events in Flavius Josephus work War of the Jews. Titus did destroy the very Galilean towns Jesus predicted. He did encircle Jerusalem with a wall and he razed the Temple exactly as Jesus foresaw, leaving “not one stone atop the other”.

    In fact, Titus campaign ended with the destruction of Masada on Passover 73CE, exactly forty years from Jesus crucifixion. Moreover, Jesus predictions concerning the Son of Man were echoed by all of Titus court historians. Each one maintained that Titus was the Christ, the Messiah which the prophecies in Jewish literature foresaw-the same prophecies Jesus cited in his predictions about the coming of the Son of Man.

    In light of all this, the discovery that all of the events of Jesus ministry were based upon Titus campaign should really not be surprising. Particular since the first Christian Pope and all of the first saints of Christianity were members of Titus imperial court. The Vatican headquarters were built upon the palace of the Flavians. What is surprising is that Christians and scholars have overlooked something as obvious as the fact that the Gospels proclaim the same thing that the Flavian imperial court historians did-that Titus is the Christ.

    So now you know the true identity of the Son of Man, one of Christianity’s top 5 secrets. If you want to know the true identity of the Jewish Messiah who was crucified on the cross-whose name was not Jesus (it was Simon Peter & or Eleazar)-I have devoted an entire chapter to this character in my book “Caesar’s Messiah”. I invite you to pick up a copy, and feel free to discuss these ideas with me on my Blog: http://Caesarsmessiah.com/blog
     
  8. cherryblossom

    cherryblossom Banned MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,252
    Likes Received:
    5,505
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +5,560
    How can Atwill possibly say that Jesus never said He was the Messiah when his DIVINE proclamations were exactly why the Pharisees sought to kill him.....for "blasphemy."

    John 4:
    [25] The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things.
    [26] Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he.

    John 10:

    [23] And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon's porch.
    [24] Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly.
    [25] Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father's name, they bear witness of me.

    [30] I and my Father are one.
    [31] Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
    [32] Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me?
    [33] The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

    Matthew 26:
    [62] And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?
    [63] But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.
    [64] Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
    [65] Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy.
    [66] What think ye? They answered and said, He is guilty of death.
    [67] Then did they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote him with the palms of their hands,
    [68] Saying, Prophesy unto us, thou Christ, Who is he that smote thee?
     
  9. lce

    lce Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    54
    Ratings:
    +54
    Yeshua was dead (and rose...bounced) long before the " great" historian Joesephus was around. In fact, he was born 37 years after Yehsua was knocked off by the Italians. To think that he and Yeshua were the same person is preposterous. That's like me describing what the shot that took out MLK sounded like. Dunno, wasn't there. But have "heard" from Jesse what it sounded like...
     
  10. lce

    lce Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    54
    Ratings:
    +54
    From another website: http://blackarabia.blogspot.com/2011/09/jesus-black-prophet-and-ancient-black.html
    In 1931 Austrian Jewish Biblical scholar and art historian Robert Eisler published a classic in Josephus scholarship, his The Messiah Jesus and John the Baptist: According to Flavius Josephus' recently rediscovered 'Capture of Jerusalem' and the other Jewish and Christian sources. Through a meticulous analysis of extant manuscripts, Eisler endeavored to restore the original reading of a first century text that discusses John the Baptist, Jesus and the early Christians. This first century source is the Halosis or “Capture (of Jerusalem)” of Josephus (37-100 CE). Originally written in Aramaic, a Greek rewriting was published around 72 CE. This is an important text for the discussion of Christian origins, particularly given the section therein treating “the human form of Jesus and his wonderful works.” Josephus, the first century Jewish historian, is believed to have had access to official Roman records on which he based his history of the early ‘Jesus movement.’ He is thus a singularly contemporary witness. His texts passed through Christian scribal hands,[1] during which process the texts were no doubt altered: some ‘offensive’ passages were omitted and some Christian embellishments interpolated.[2] However, according to Eisler, a Slavonic (Old Russian) translation made from the original Greek text preserves – in scattered form – that original Josephean Testimony. By reconstructing the relevant passages, Eisler ‘restored’ what he believed is the original, first century description of the man Jesus.[3] His very significant restoration follows:
    “At that time also there appeared a certain man of magic power … if it be meet to call him a man, [whose name is Jesus], whom [certain] Greeks call a son of [a] God, but his disciples [call] the true prophet who is supposed to have raised dead persons and to have cured all diseases. Both his nature and his form were human, for he was a man of simple appearance, mature age, black-skinned (melagchrous), short growth, three cubits tall, hunchbacked, prognathous (lit. ‘with a long face [macroprosopos]), a long nose, eyebrows meeting above the nose, that the spectators could take fright, with scanty [curly] hair, but having a line in the middle of the head after the fashion of the Nazaraeans, with an undeveloped beard. (*Halōsis, ii.174).”[4]
    This is a remarkable image of Jesus! A short, hunchbacked black-man with a unibrow, short (kinky)[5] hair with a part down the middle, and a scanty (nappy?) beard would have made the Passion of Christa profoundly different experience for undoubtedly every viewer. That this basic description goes back to Josephus is affirmed by a number of early Christian ecclesiastics, such as Andreas Hierosolymitannus, Archbishop of Crete (8th cent.) and John of Damascus (8th cent.).[6] Most of the details of this description are found in other Christian literature of an even earlier period. As T.W. Doane quotes:
    “In its first years, the Christian church fancied its Lord’s visage and form marred more than those of other men; and that he must have had no attractions of personal beauty. Justin Marty (A.D. 150-160) speaks of him as without beauty or attractiveness, and of mean appearance. Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 200), describes him as of an uninviting appearance, and almost repulsive. Tertullian (A.D. 200-210) says he had not even ordinary human beauty, far less heavenly. Origen (A.D. 230) went so far as to say that he was ‘small in body and deformed.’ As well as low-born, and that, ‘his only beauty was in his soul and life (emphasis Doane’s).[7]
    Nothing new is underneath the Sun. No need to cop your book brah, I'll never believe what the killers (Romans and the alike) conspired and created. Yeshua is the truth!
     
  11. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,444
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    The New testament was back dated 40 years. the real time in question is 66-73AD
     
Loading...