Black Spirituality Religion : GOD exists and there is Proof

Music Producer

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
May 31, 2004
3,809
102
GOD exists and there is proof of ITs existence. The problem is the people who exist as that proof are taught to reject their existence, their nature as a whole thus they are taught to reject that proof.

We set here and talk about how we can communicate and meditate with GOD but yet we reject the very doctrines and words from our ancestors that make the same claim of communication.

So what difference does it make if you can boast about meditation and understanding GOD through it when the words you write about your experiences are meaningless or relegated to lies, junk, inventions and petty mythology of men even being relegated to being the writings of another race?

Basically our attitude has become, “lets reject what ancient people have written about their meditation experiences but let us today meditate and accept it over what the ancestors wrote”. We are kinda developing an oxymoron.

What good is it to explain your meditation experiences if you are the same person that totally rejects the writings of other people’s meditation experiences?

We look for proof of GOD but we reject the words that proves it because we so-called meditate to experience GOD. Well, those people that wrote the Specific Word of GOD also made the claim of meditation. So if you reject theirs why should we accept yours?

This is one of the questions someone that meditates experienced during their meditation…

Job:39:26: Doth the hawk fly by thy wisdom, and stretch her wings toward the south?


But yet we reject and teach others to reject these ancient meditation experiences but yet try to sway people to accept our recent and own meditation experiences.

We try to invalidate our ancestors but yet validate ourselves.

This is pure nuts.
 
Deut:28:48


Deut:28:48: Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the LORD shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee.

A book that predicts the future several times is proof of the existence of GOD or a Higher Power that exists outside of linear time.
 
GOD exists and there is proof of ITs existence. The problem is the people who exist as that proof are taught to reject their existence, their nature as a whole thus they are taught to reject that proof.

We set here and talk about how we can communicate and meditate with GOD but yet we reject the very doctrines and words from our ancestors that make the same claim of communication.

So what difference does it make if you can boast about meditation and understanding GOD through it when the words you write about your experiences are meaningless or relegated to lies, junk, inventions and petty mythology of men even being relegated to being the writings of another race?

Basically our attitude has become, “lets reject what ancient people have written about their meditation experiences but let us today meditate and accept it over what the ancestors wrote”. We are kinda developing an oxymoron.

What good is it to explain your meditation experiences if you are the same person that totally rejects the writings of other people’s meditation experiences?

We look for proof of GOD but we reject the words that proves it because we so-called meditate to experience GOD. Well, those people that wrote the Specific Word of GOD also made the claim of meditation. So if you reject theirs why should we accept yours?

This is one of the questions someone that meditates experienced during their meditation…

Job:39:26: Doth the hawk fly by thy wisdom, and stretch her wings toward the south?


But yet we reject and teach others to reject these ancient meditation experiences but yet try to sway people to accept our recent and own meditation experiences.

We try to invalidate our ancestors but yet validate ourselves.

This is pure nuts.


I can understand this. I've often asked myself that as well. How can one claim their experience is more reliable than another's? And should be believed over one from the past when it was they who had more wisdom to know that the Father is certainly always there and has not forsaken the earth?

The thing is though, when rejected or accepting holy teachings, I don't think it has to be all or nothing, like some believe. There are teachings from back when that were false, and put out there to mislead the masses, but there is that which is truth and is here for the masses to be led to life. I believe this is in the Holy Doctrine of the Bible where we are taught of the Son of the Father, His sacrifice for our sins, His resurrection from the dead, and His salvation He has granted us by the Most High's great compassion upon the world and those who believe and have faith. I know to some, it's not true, but it was already stated by Paul that the Word, to those who love the ways of this world, wouldn't seem as though it were a fountain of life, but quite the opposite, so such is no surprise. But there will be those who see the Light for what He is.
 

Donate

Support destee.com, the oldest, most respectful, online black community in the world - PayPal or CashApp

Latest profile posts

HODEE wrote on Etophil's profile.
Welcome to Destee
@Etophil
Destee wrote on SleezyBigSlim's profile.
Hi @SleezyBigSlim ... Welcome Welcome Welcome ... :flowers: ... please make yourself at home ... :swings:
Back
Top