All of this is to be considered and understood for what it was....the killer is the time frame. Once we look at the emergence of the so called Hebrews, historically we are own our way down hill. All the great advances in technology, medicine, architecture, science and so forth are already old and Kemet is on its way down hill. The history of our people, even from a Biblical perspective is nothing more than a story of conflict and wars with outsiders...resulting in what we have today due to our own people taking them to be more humane than they have demonstrated themselves to be with us and with their own people.
Brother, in all respects, I agree with you for the most part (I have been reading your book more lately, esp. 'The Issue of Abraham')
but to say the history of our people is nothing more than a story of conflict and war with outsiders is not exactly true. Unless of course, Osiris and Horus are 'outsiders' becuase no doubt Set(h) is/was a black Nubian predynastic king, and it was this conflict which led to the unification of upper and lower kindoms and even the defeat of the so called Hyksos led to the consolidation of upper and lower kingdoms. In your book you argue on one hand that Abraham did not exist, and on the other hand that if he did exist that he was white. I have myself argued in a thread here that he did not exist, so I can agree with that argument but what archaeological proof do you posess to prove that he was white? Of course you can provide no such archaeological proof if he did not exist. Yes, the killer is the time frame because during the Rammesid period the Abydos kings list was reconstruced erasing from Truestory many people who now are known to have existed and we know of their existence as a result of more recent archaeological excavation.