My failure to read and write well in the English language is just that, my failure. It says nothing about other people’s abilities to communicate.
Either way the sentence makes no sense to me, we would have be out of this would for our words not to be related to the universe the world is in. How what you’re saying here is not related to the universe is perplexing to me.
If you feel that language is a limited form of communicating and there are better ways I’m OK with that. It just seems like such a bizarre idea that I don’t know what to say.
If I gave you the impression that science has something to say about god I’m sorry. Science has nothing to say about god:
Science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world.
Science for me does a very good job of describing a rainbow and can do more than a drawing in the sand today. We can start by taking a picture, some video perhaps and we have only just began. Personally I have not seen the galaxy we live in but science has given me a very good description of what it looks like along with models and pictures. As limited as you say science is all we know we know through science. It may not work for you, you may find it inadequate but without science how else can you know the universe? Without science how do you come to even know there is a universe?
There may be other ways of knowing that don’t include communication, reason and science. I just don’t know what they are or any results they have produced. We know very little about the universe but the little we do know we know though science.
I do not think anyone should be forced to uses communication, reason or science to know anything. In this world however we can test what methods result in knowing and which ones don’t.
“And all I'm saying to you is: there is a larger context.. and larger scope.. and other ways of seeing.. and being.. and understanding.. and it would be a shame to throw them all away for not fitting within a single way.
Notice how that is roughly the same thing a Scientist might say to a Christian/Muslim.
And quiet as it's kept, that is because both Religion and Science can be fit into a larger context of modern man's perpetual search for certainty.. reliability.. assurance.. control.”
I know of many religious people who would say this but no scientist. Scientists make no clams about things they know nothing about. If they are other ways of knowing science is unaware of them and has nothing to say about them.
Throw nothing away but in the natural world religion has told as nothing so far. Science has nothing to say about the supernatural world. Nothing is being kept quiet about their incompatibility, they may both be ways “man” attempts to know but they come to completely different conclusions. One makes clams in the observable universe the other clams to know of things out side of the universe.
Either way the sentence makes no sense to me, we would have be out of this would for our words not to be related to the universe the world is in. How what you’re saying here is not related to the universe is perplexing to me.
If you feel that language is a limited form of communicating and there are better ways I’m OK with that. It just seems like such a bizarre idea that I don’t know what to say.
If I gave you the impression that science has something to say about god I’m sorry. Science has nothing to say about god:
- One we have no agreed upon definition of what god is
- Two science deals with the natural world not the supernatural.
Science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world.
Science for me does a very good job of describing a rainbow and can do more than a drawing in the sand today. We can start by taking a picture, some video perhaps and we have only just began. Personally I have not seen the galaxy we live in but science has given me a very good description of what it looks like along with models and pictures. As limited as you say science is all we know we know through science. It may not work for you, you may find it inadequate but without science how else can you know the universe? Without science how do you come to even know there is a universe?
There may be other ways of knowing that don’t include communication, reason and science. I just don’t know what they are or any results they have produced. We know very little about the universe but the little we do know we know though science.
I do not think anyone should be forced to uses communication, reason or science to know anything. In this world however we can test what methods result in knowing and which ones don’t.
“And all I'm saying to you is: there is a larger context.. and larger scope.. and other ways of seeing.. and being.. and understanding.. and it would be a shame to throw them all away for not fitting within a single way.
Notice how that is roughly the same thing a Scientist might say to a Christian/Muslim.
And quiet as it's kept, that is because both Religion and Science can be fit into a larger context of modern man's perpetual search for certainty.. reliability.. assurance.. control.”
I know of many religious people who would say this but no scientist. Scientists make no clams about things they know nothing about. If they are other ways of knowing science is unaware of them and has nothing to say about them.
Throw nothing away but in the natural world religion has told as nothing so far. Science has nothing to say about the supernatural world. Nothing is being kept quiet about their incompatibility, they may both be ways “man” attempts to know but they come to completely different conclusions. One makes clams in the observable universe the other clams to know of things out side of the universe.