Brother AACOOLDRE : Farrakhan's 400 years of slavery

Discussion in 'AACOOLDRE' started by AACOOLDRE, Mar 13, 2012.


    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    United States
    Jul 26, 2001
    Likes Received:
    400 years Slaves? Not

    By Andre Austin

    Where are the 4 hundred years of affliction. This is where the biblical redactors confused two stories. One was about the Canaanite affliction over Egypt, a description of the hyksos era when Canaanites ruled Egypt. The other was about a departure of Israel from Egypt. Lets look at the genesis prophecy to see how these two stories were combined.

    Abraham’s seed will be a stranger in the land of Canaan and suffer under the Canaanites (Genesis 17:8) also genesis 37:1

    The first stage to the reconstruction recognize that Canaan (not Egypt) caused the affliction. This isn’t talking about blacks in America like Farrakhan wants you to believe.

    “ Be enslaved and mistreated four hundred years… But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again for the iniquity of the Amorites ( Canaan/Hyksos) is not yet full”.(Genesis 15:13-16)

    This passage has always been interpreted to mean that Israel will come out of Egypt, but that it will have to wait until problems with the Amorites disappear. It is then argued that Moses fulfilled the prophecy in that he was in the fourth generation after Jacob. But the prophecy says in the fourth generation, not after the fourth generation. Since Moses is in the fifth generation beginning with Jacob, he doesn’t fall within the terms of the prediction.

    The Hyksos, the basis of the story about affliction, were of Canaanite origin, but which Canaanites they were we don’t know. They ruled parts of Egypt from about 1750Bc, and all or most of Egypt from about 1680BC, and remained in power to about 1572BC. The name Hyksos mean “Chieftains from the hill country”. Their headquarters at Avaris (city of Pithom or Ramesis Exodus 1:1:11) they found Joseph ring saying Jacob was his father. I’ve read only two Jacob’s in the Bible.

    The term Amorite originally meant specific groups of people in Canaan. It eventually evolved into a term describing Canaanites from the central hill areas in Canaan. So, Hyksos & Amorite both refereed to the same groups of people.

    In any event when Abraham went to Egypt, the Hyksos were in charge of the northern delta and Abraham later fled from that territory from lower Egypt to upper Egypt for the protection of the black Egyptians. Joseph came into Egypt and shortly after the Egyptians defeated the Hyksos.

    Reducing God’s prophecy to Abraham to its essential components we have the correct following scenario:

    1. Abraham sojourned in Egypt

    2. Canaanites (Hyksos afflicted Egypt)

    3. In strange land not Egypt but Canaan

    4. After fourth generation Canaanite power of the Amorites/Hyksos had ended

    5. Joseph fourth generation from Abraham returned to Egypt

    6. Moses led an Exodus out of Egypt into Canaan.

    What we have here are two separate stories that have become entangled due to confusion by the biblical redactors.

    The biblical redactors, who no longer remembered that the Israelite ancestors of the patriarchal age had lived in Egypt, only knew of Israelites as a Canaanite people who had been afflicted in Egypt. They read these two stories from a Canaanite rather than Egyptian perspective. From that point of view, persecution in a land of strangers meant Egypt instead of Canaan. They integrated the first story with the second story to reflect a single affliction. The mistreatment of the Jews came from Hyksos not Egypt. But the Jews didn’t know this and in retaliation put a curse on Ham’s son Canaan. Then racism against blacks started in Hollywood with Black peoples eyes popping out of their head from the curse of Ham homosexually looking at Noah’s being naked. The Jews are making up for the error by making some positive roles models in Hollywood movies but there is no widespread repudiation of their scripture.

    Now enter the schrphernic Farrakhan who places black slavery and the 400 year affliction from 1555AD to 1955AD We know in 1955 MLK and Rosa Parks and the modern Civil Rights period began. Blacks in America are not the 400 plus year slaves in the Bible. Change the 1555Ad back to 1555BC when the Hyksos was afflicting and mistreating both Jews and Egyptians. Moses and his peoples slavery was something different than the Hyksos lasting less than thirty years from about 1340BC-1315BC.


    “Amorites (Hyksos) live in hill country”-Numbers 13:29. This is the exact meaning of the word Hyksos, Hyksos means “Chieftains from the hill country”.

  2. Keita Kenyatta

    Keita Kenyatta going above and beyond PREMIUM MEMBER

    Feb 7, 2004
    Likes Received:

    So true so true. The big mystery is that the Neanderthals are running things.

    Only 4.5% of Jews in the world, according to the Jewish Encyclopaedia (the first post-World War II, 1960 edition), could trace their ancestry back to the Holy Land and they are called “Sephardic” Jews from the Hebrew word for Spain, Sepharad. There are very few of them in the United States, but some live in the southern states bordering the Gulf of Mexico. That explained my own Jewish family heritage, which had always puzzled me. I learned, to my surprise, that my family was Sephardic from Louisiana.

    Many Sephardic Jews presently live in and around the Caribbean where they were the first “Spanish” and “Portuguese” conquistadors and colonists. My Jewish ancestors were thus responsible for the genocide of millions of American Indians and for starting the transatlantic slave trade in Black Africans. Other Sephardic Jews live in Spain, southern France, South America and South Africa.

    The other 95.5% of all “Jews” in the world come from Russian steppe tribesmen who converted to Judaism about 1300 years after the biblical scriptures had been written. They are called “Ashkenazi” Jews and they have no genetic ancestry among Abraham’s biblical Israelites at all.
    They were the prime so-called “Jewish” victims of Hitler’s so-called “Holocaust”. They constituted, from 1948, the vast majority of modern Israel’s population. For many of them who now reside in Israel, Florida, California or New York City, their first language is still Russian.

    These Ashkenazi “Jews” had immigrated massively into the United States between 1870 and 1920 and are the people that ordinary Americans know as “Jews”. Most of them settled in New York City originally. The largest Jewish newspaper in the U.S. is the Forward, published in New York City, and it still puts out an all-Russian edition. The Ashkenazi “Jews” then spread all over the country, and especially to Florida and California, and they are notable for creating Hollywood’s movie industry.

    When I had finally digested all this, which took about six months, the animal-like animosity of the New York Times editorial became crystal clear. The “Jewish” Ashkenazim had come from a region of known late-lingering Neanderthals, the Caucasus Mountains and the neighboring Russian steppes.

    Some typically “Jewish” physical traits were very obviously vestigial Neanderthal ones – generally a short stature and a plump physique, many very short wide-hipped and big- breasted women, extremely hairy men and a tendency toward beetling brows and large beaky “hooked” noses in both genders. Many Ashkenazim have crinkly-curly head hair tending toward dark reddish brown or mahogany in color.

    Among Ashkenazi “Jews” there is also a genetic tendency toward beaky faces, not only just noses, and big mouths (in more ways than one) that “wrap around” the lower face. Barbara Streisand and Julia Roberts provide two lovely and very well known examples of how attractive this genetic trait can be. But these are not “Semitic” physical traits. They are Neanderthal physical characteristics.

    And maybe some Neanderthal emotional and behavioral traits persisted among the Ashkenazim along with the physical ones.
    Their “chosen people” pretension is a typical Neanderthal in-group obsession that is actually a genetic racist predisposition against all other humans. It is a genetically determined “us against them” mentality. Their higher level of known Neanderthal aggression against outsiders is responsible for their disproportional social influence wherever they have settled in the West.

    Their men’s feelings of sexual inadequacy are a Neanderthal genetic legacy reflected in much more frequent confusion of sexual orientation than occurs among males of other Caucasian ethnic groups and other races. It has been the subject of too-numerous Jewish-authored books and screenplays, and Woody Allen’s work (and private life) is a very well known example of this Jewish predicament.

    This genetic Neanderthal psychosexual maladaptation has also bequeathed to Jews a tendency toward emotional instability and hysteria when they feel nervous or threatened... which is all the time when they are not in absolute control. And they are arrogant, but uneasy, even then. An ethnic symptom of this emotional instability is the Jewish tendency toward hypochondria. Even they cannot (yet) control death.
    This unfortunate combination of high aggression combined with a tendency toward hysteria and emotional instability has proved to be a dangerous and tragic situation over the course of Western history. Their aggression encourages continual Jewish attempts to control societies, while the emotional instability makes it difficult for most Jews to distinguish reasonably between justified social criticism by their non-Jewish neighbors and attacks.

    Insensitive even to objective concerns about inordinate Jewish influence in societies, and reacting with hysterical aggression to any such supposed “attack” on their behavior and pleas from non-Jews to limit it, Jews have always provoked violence against themselves. And then they, with much emotional satisfaction, feel victimized and attribute the situation to innate “anti-Semitism” among their neighbors.

    This tragic cycle happened most recently in Nazi Germany, of course, but it had happened previously in almost all European countries. This historical pattern is the social result of Neanderthal genetic traits of high aggression and emotional instability caused by Ice Age psychosexual maladaptation. All this is very clear to me now.
    The Iceman Inheritance as published in 1978 had been written only in terms of “Caucasians”, “Western humanity”, “white men” and so on. But with my research after the New York Times op-ed polemic of July 1992, I soon discovered that it was really a much more relevant pen-portrait of Ashkenazi “Jews”. Some other scattered European ethnic groups share generally similar physical characteristics, of course, but not nearly so strongly and consistently as Ashkenazi Jews.

    The Ashkenazi Jews, as a group, exhibit lingering Neanderthal traits most strongly among living Caucasians because of Jewish prohibitions against marriage with outsiders. Their Neanderthal genes have been kept “all in the family”, as it were. These Neanderthal genes were not diluted by intermarriage nearly as much as with most other Caucasians.

    The New York Times had realized this by July 20, 1992 with its vicious and inaccurate editorial, or (as I have said) about six months before I did. I have since had good reasons to suspect that Jewish physical and social anthropologists at New York City’s Columbia University, students of the great Dr. Harold L. Shapiro, had alerted the New York Times to this potentially embarrassing anthropological situation revealed “between the lines” of The Iceman Inheritance.