Pan Africanism : Evolution ?

Discussion in 'Black History - Culture - Panafricanism' started by African_Prince, Sep 27, 2005.

  1. African_Prince

    African_Prince Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +48
    This is a stupid question but I was reading a thread on peckerwood.org(stormfront) about evolution and the Out of Africa theory, and I was thinking. If Black people stayed in Europe and N.America or wherever else where the indiginous people are not dark skinned w/ African features would our genes, over the course of 10s of thousands of years, naturally mutate and we lose our dark skin, kinky hair and facial features? If I'm not mistaken it was anatomically modern humans ( I don't know whether they were behaviourly modern or not, I think I remember reading there was some vonfusion about that ) who migrated out of Africa and populated Europe and Asia, they weren't still evolving, so could we lose these features like they have? Could Whites and Indians in sub-saharan Africa gain them?
     
  2. Deepvoice

    Deepvoice Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Messages:
    750
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4
    The Eskimos have been in Alaska for a number years with a climate that is alot colder than Europe, but yet they still have their jet black hair and deep brown eyes.
     
  3. anAfrican

    anAfrican Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,484
    Likes Received:
    711
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    The Meek !Shall! Inherit the Earth.
    Location:
    StreetNationEarth: Seattle
    Ratings:
    +745
    i've come to the thought that 250,000 years ago, there was one continent on this planet. all over that continent were the proto-humanoid lifeforms that would eventually evolve into humans. when the continents started drifting, there were some on all the pieces that drifted. since it was all still on earth the evolutionary process continued. some evolved on the chunks that would be the americas, some on the chunk that would be australia and some on the chunks that would be northern europe. those in the cold places kept their animal like natures longer because it was colder: thinner nostrils because cold air is thicker than warm, more hair because it was colder, and white skin because of all the hair blocking what sun there was so no need for the protection of malanin from the sun. also, since there wasn't as much of the natural environment around, they developed this attitude of "resource scarcity" and hoarding resources. today these folks still try to "de-nature" the areas that they have infested. they still believe in this "resource shortage" and having to fight for resources. they still believe that there isn't anything around but them, even though there are obviously people all over the place; they have consistently sought to shove those people right out of their homes and take what has been developed as their own.

    no, in tens of thousands of years, there probably wouldn't have been the changes. but in hundreds of thousands of years?

    as far as the American Indian; notice how much they resemble us? as well as the mexican/hispanic/latino? the native peoples of south america? also, notice the somewhat asian cast to the Eskimo? i do think that there was a migration across europe and into the americas. but i also think that there was someone already here when they arrived.

    oh, and interestingly enough; in that quarter billion years of continental drift, Africa is the only continent on the planet that has not moved!! original peoples in their original place!! (i've also seen stuff that suggests that in another couple hundred thousand years, the continents will have drifted back together again. wonder what those folks will make of these "ancient civilisations" of ours?!)
     
  4. Deepvoice

    Deepvoice Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Messages:
    750
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4
    This evolution stuff is sticky. The people in Stormfront White Nationals use this evolution theory for an excuse as to why they are superior to blacks. They say out of all the people on the earth the Khoi and the Australoids(Papua New Guinea, Aborigines, certain south Indian populations) are the most unevolved. The Fijians and the Khoi often times favor the the heck out of African Americans, so I guess I am more monkey than them, lol.
     
  5. anAfrican

    anAfrican Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,484
    Likes Received:
    711
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    The Meek !Shall! Inherit the Earth.
    Location:
    StreetNationEarth: Seattle
    Ratings:
    +745
    don't believe anything that has ever been put down in any media format since "them maggots" started misinterpreting everything on this planet. it's all lies! everything they say is completely bass-ackwards. but y'all know that ...

    Honor Your KNOWS Flow!
     
  6. African_Prince

    African_Prince Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +48
    There is no scientific evidence pointing to any human population being 'unevolved'. I don't understand how the KhoiKhoi/San and Fijians/Melanesian populations favor Black Americans? More than anything that matters, how it can be interpreted etc., is it true or not.
     
  7. Deepvoice

    Deepvoice Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Messages:
    750
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4
    There is no scientific evidence pointing to any human population being 'unevolved'. I don't understand how the KhoiKhoi/San and Fijians/Melanesian populations favor Black Americans? More than anything that matters, how it can be interpreted etc., is it true or not.
    African_Prince

    That is what I read these people say. I wouldn't pull this from nowhere just for the sake of arguing, it just amazes me how black people believe this stuff when in actuality many whites believe the same and use this as the main reason why black populations are dying out. Survival of the fittest type of stuff.
     
  8. African_Prince

    African_Prince Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +48
    Oh, I never doubted you. I read the same theories myself . I don't understand how the Out of Africa theory ( which some of those WN's renounce ) proves Black people are inferior or 'unevolved', to my understanding, the Africans who migrated into Europe and Asia changed physically to adapt to their environment ( ie. lighter skin being more receptive to the suns Vitamin D since Europe isn't as hot as Africa or Asia ) and genes naturally mutate. As far as I know, it's not that they survived or evolved over any Black Africans they just changed ( and I know how simple that sounds ).

    However any pro-Afrocentric or WN ( not to put them anywhere near each other in the same category ) interpret the Out of Africa theory, I'm interested in whether or not it is true or not. Virtually all scientists subscribe to it. I don't see this as meaning anything other then Black people are the world's indiginous race but the liberal scientists who subscribe to it will intepret it as " we are all one, we are all Africans under the skin blah blah blah", interpretation is one thing but no scientific evidence points to any human population being inferior or 'unevolved', we are all part of one human race however that sounds and I'm not all 'we are the world' ish. In short, I'm interested in the truth, not jus the interpretations.
     
  9. Deepvoice

    Deepvoice Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Messages:
    750
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4
    I feel you. I was just wondering if you knew that white nationals use this as a way to degrade us, apparently you probably knew it before I did. I've heard some of them say that the reason why we commit so much more crimes is because we produce higher levels of testosterone and have smaller brains. They also say that during the evolutionary stage while food and everything was right there in front of the African, it did not force him to think creatively to catch his meal, whereas in Europe since everything was so scarce they had to use cunning and wit to catch their game.

    They say eventually Europeans grew more and more in intellect than the African because of these reasons.
     
  10. African_Prince

    African_Prince Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +48
    I'm afraid they say a lot of silly **** to make themselves feel better.
     
Loading...