- Jan 31, 2009
- 2,450
- 1,375
I know, the internet is surely something
http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist....io-vaccine-tainted-with-cancer-causing-virus/
http://truthstreammedia.com/did-vac...rs-hide-sv40-tainted-vaccine-links-to-cancer/
http://rense.com/general59/taint.htm
Don't care for rense.com much, but will leave it for context
http://www.vaccinetruth.org/serratia_marcescens.htm
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/loca...ccines-Tainted-With-Meningitis-173359701.html
Take those vaccines yearly, don't miss out
Grams used to say "I never got sick until I got a flu shot"
Glad grams didn't have the internet
A lot of grams friends probably knew someone crippled from polio too.
I opened the first link and noticed the title claims this: CDC Admits Polio Vaccine Tainted with Cancer Causing Virus
From the factsheet that the article talks about:
- The majority of scientific evidence suggests that SV40-contaminated vaccine did not cause cancer; however, some research results are conflicting and more studies are needed.
Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20130522...pdates/archive/polio_and_cancer_factsheet.htm
I think vaccine quality control should be improved constantly to help minimize the risk of incidents like this, but that doesn't mean that vaccines should be avoided or are bad in general. I also have some ideas how models that rely on purely for-profit models might not be the best way to do this, but those are probably best left for another thread.