- Jun 25, 2006
- social worker
I have noticed that since i have become a member that u seem to have a number of members banned. I carefully reviewed some of the statments u highlighted for mr samuri 36 and i have to agree that he is rather opinionated about a lot of things and he is rather honnest about them. this makes him no different than alot of us. However how is your brand of sensorship different from the goverment. He just has a matter of fact approach that conicdes with his refusal to accept things in which he understands to be untrue. This makes him no different from the mass of our historical leaders whom have been slienced by the goverment for our radical views and matter of fact approach for delivery. don't misinterpret me equating him with an historical leader i just see your bran of banning individuals as similar in some repects. I have personally interacted with mr samuri when we did not agree however i do repect him. Mr samuri is not the only black individual whom has critized many of our prominent ancestors. If they were wrong they were wrong. A lot of our prominent teachers have reviewed the body of work by our ancestors and disagree with some of thier tactics. I was very touched by mr samuri story about his fateher is not no different from some one going on oprah and releasing some vexing memories from the past. I know i am new but this is looking troubling. I hope my honnesty does not change my relationship with u or this community and those who love u. Question maybe we should have a community vote before some one is banned and if the majority agrees one way or another than so be it. When u do it alone it appears to be personal.