Black Relationships : Dating More Than One Person

MimiBelle

Well-Known Member
MEMBER
Dec 13, 2010
417
416
Texas...for now.
Occupation
RN-BSN
I believe some people may need to revisit the laws of god..........

Whore:

1. a prostitute or promiscuous woman: often a term of abuse
vb
2. to be or act as a prostitute
3. (of a man) to have promiscuous sexual relations, esp with prostitutes
4. ( often foll by after ) to seek that which is immoral, idolatrous, etc
Harlot:
a female capable of frequently having casual sexual relations with different partners and is completely undiscriminative in the choice of sexual partners, hence being appreciated by everyone she knows. also known as a sex saint.
:rolleyes:
1.
OP asked a question about dating.
Who said anything about having indiscriminate sex?
What's all this talk about 'harlotry' and 'whoredom'?
Lastly, why's this directed solely at women?

MOST men practically follow their crotch up and down the road.
Don't sprain your wrist slapping the sloppy males on the back for the same behavior you criticize in women....

2.
... and you're how old, again?
*smirk*
There's a difference between having 'sex' and 'dating'...and dating may/not have a thing to do with sex.
Po' thang....
Of course, it's possible to 'luck out' - but, really... I don't see how someone can maintain a functional relationship when they don't even know how to 'date' properly...and I'm getting that this is unfamiliar territory for you.

****************

When you're single and not in any type of committed relationship, but looking, do you date one person at a time, or do you date more then one?
When I was single, I had relations with one man at a time...but dating?
I dated several men at a time.

It's just more efficient. If you're not with someone, why would you put all of your eggs in that basket? It's a good thing to have options.

I had my males friends, the men that I met while out and about that I dated and the guy with whom I shared something that looked a lot like a relationship.
The men that I dated were an ever-changing lineup, of course. Friendship was always an option. I just never realized how much it irritates men to be 'friendzoned'. I never saw it like that.
In my defense, I already HAD someone for sex and emotional purposes...
 

Chinelo

Third Eye Is Always Open
MEMBER
Oct 19, 2009
5,087
1,639
UNIVERSE
Occupation
Removing LIES And Spreading The Truth
1.
OP asked a question about dating.
Who said anything about having indiscriminate sex?
What's all this talk about 'harlotry' and 'whoredom'?
Lastly, why's this directed solely at women?

MOST men practically follow their crotch up and down the road.
Don't sprain your wrist slapping the sloppy males on the back for the same behavior you criticize in women....

2.
... and you're how old, again?
*smirk*
There's a difference between having 'sex' and 'dating'...and dating may/not have a thing to do with sex.
Po' thang....
Of course, it's possible to 'luck out' - but, really... I don't see how someone can maintain a functional relationship when they don't even know how to 'date' properly...and I'm getting that this is unfamiliar territory for you.

****************



When I was single, I had relations with one man at a time...but dating?
I dated several men at a time.

It's just more efficient. If you're not with someone, why would you put all of your eggs in that basket? It's a good thing to have options.

I had my males friends, the men that I met while out and about that I dated and the guy with whom I shared something that looked a lot like a relationship.
The men that I dated were an ever-changing lineup, of course. Friendship was always an option. I just never realized how much it irritates men to be 'friendzoned'. I never saw it like that.
In my defense, I already HAD someone for sex and emotional purposes...
You're first in a LONG line of FOOLISH....What you did and whats being proposed is "whoredom"....you can take it or leave it.....for all I care.....

By the way....are you Married to the man you had "RELATIONS" with....I can already guess the answer is NO....right? lol...smh....Never ends.........
 

jamesfrmphilly

going above and beyond
PREMIUM MEMBER
Jun 18, 2004
37,017
12,128
north philly ghetto
Occupation
retired computer geek
You're first in a LONG line of FOOLISH....What you did and whats being proposed is "whoredom"....you can take it or leave it.....for all I care.....

By the way....are you Married to the man you had "RELATIONS" with....I can already guess the answer is NO....right? lol...smh....Never ends.........
and yourself? since you point fingers and call names i assume that YOU have never had sex, right?
 

Asomfwaa

Well-Known Member
MEMBER
Nov 16, 2011
3,393
2,561
You're first in a LONG line of FOOLISH....What you did and whats being proposed is "whoredom"....you can take it or leave it.....for all I care.....

By the way....are you Married to the man you had "RELATIONS" with....I can already guess the answer is NO....right? lol...smh....Never ends.........
Yeah what gives? Protected sex between a responsible couple doesn't harm anyone. Are you a virgin?
 

jamesfrmphilly

going above and beyond
PREMIUM MEMBER
Jun 18, 2004
37,017
12,128
north philly ghetto
Occupation
retired computer geek
1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24
3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
 

info-moetry

STAFF
STAFF
Dec 20, 2004
10,714
6,418
The rotten Apple
Occupation
A+ technician
1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24
3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
LOL - Philly done whipped out the scriptures on 'em. I think that might be adding fuel to the fire though because i don't think Chinelo believes in the by-bill, but i'm sure he can find verses that may back up what he's talking about the same way you did.....

Round n round we go/where we stop/nobody know
 

Consciousness Raising Online!

Allow the N Word - yes or no?

  • yes

    Votes: 2 14.3%
  • no

    Votes: 6 42.9%
  • not sure

    Votes: 6 42.9%

Latest profile posts

Charles Thompson wrote on Enki's profile.
Good evening
"And I'm feeling good."-Nina Simone
Destee wrote on Angela22's profile.
Hi Sweetie Pie Honey Bunch!!!! ... :dance4: ... Welcome Home! So good to have your sweet Spirit in the house! ... YAAAAAAY USSSSS! ... :yaay: :yaay: :swings: ... :heart:
Angela22 wrote on Enki's profile.
I hope all is well with you. Much love.:love:
Destee wrote on Charles Thompson's profile.
Hi Chuck ... is that you?!!! ... YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!! ... :yaay: ... I sure hope so! I have thought of you often! If it is not you, sorry for writing on your profile page @Charles Thompson and Welcome! ... :wave:
Top