- Nov 2, 2009
- 8,801
- 5,870
- Occupation
- independent thoughtist thinker, context linker
yeah.. but the subject of the "responsibility" has to do with the function of the position.. not his personal life.. how he eats his breakfast.. or ties his shoes.. or expresses his sexuality has nothing to do with how he represents his constituents.. The most skilled accountant in the region might be a cross-dresser but what difference does that make if his numbers are straight? That prudish moral standard that americans irrationally apply to everything.. even our
military members that are straight killers.. is crazy.. Look at what congress actually does.. how much blood is on their hands.. but a politician can't talk dirty with some chic he met?? The american lie is getting to be too big of a burden to carry.. there's no wholesomeness here.. their may be some puritanical foundations here.. but there's too much blood here for wholesomeness to also exist.. its all a lie.
military members that are straight killers.. is crazy.. Look at what congress actually does.. how much blood is on their hands.. but a politician can't talk dirty with some chic he met?? The american lie is getting to be too big of a burden to carry.. there's no wholesomeness here.. their may be some puritanical foundations here.. but there's too much blood here for wholesomeness to also exist.. its all a lie.