I read and understood I Kings 13!
Music Producer,
I read and understood I KINGS 13, having read it many times before, per, the markings and highlights in my Bible, I am all to aware of the particular sin of Jerboam and the teachers of light and dark.
To me, this is a milk bible study you have offered. Thanks be to GOD, I am of full age and by reason of use my senses-exercised to discern both good and evil.
But, nevertheless, I will entertain you with this, if need be.
However, this quote from you strikes me as strange:
"Your only excuse is prejudice, to see the full scope of the Supreme Being this is an emotion you must do away with because the Supreme Being is the same Being in Egyptian theology just as in the KJV Bible because there can only be One Supreme Being. This is why you are unable to debate and defend you perception beyond the KJV Bible. You perception of the Supreme Being must be able to reach beyond the KJV Bible because GOD and man existed and had a working relationship before the KJV Bible was written in it current entirety."
You almost sound like Keita, towards the King James Bible. Or have you deceived me into thinking you were a proponent of the King James?
Sincerely,
Clyde
Music Producer said:Because you are not distinguishing the difference between teachers of Light and teachers of Dark. Teachers of Dark exist to prove you against GOD to pull your faith from GOD and redirect it to a lesser being. They exist to prove your loyalty to GOD and GOD creates them to be just that. Balaam was an evil prophet that taught and ministered the dark side but yet Balaam was a servant of GOD.
Deut:13:3: Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
You are not making those words a reality in your perception of GOD. If you are to accept John or Mark as being the Specific Word of GOD then you have no excuse to not accept words from all other prophets of GOD from the beginning of time. You have no valid reasoning to ignore words of the prophets and ministers of Ra or Amun or the gods of the Babylonians. Your only excuse is prejudice, to see the full scope of the Supreme Being this is an emotion you must do away with because the Supreme Being is the same Being in Egyptian theology just as in the KJV Bible because there can only be One Supreme Being. This is why you are unable to debate and defend you perception beyond the KJV Bible. You perception of the Supreme Being must be able to reach beyond the KJV Bible because GOD and man existed and had a working relationship before the KJV Bible was written in it current entirety.
John as a Dark Teacher is proving you against this……
Isa:44:24: Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;
Notice the passage is Decreed as GOD Speaking, thus John is proving you against the Specific Word of GOD. I believe in the New Testament just as I believe in all religions but I classify the New Testament as Teaching from Dark Side. If you would read Job the men that set with Job to comfort and debate with him were Dark Teachers.
One that proves you comes from heaven. Evil comes from heaven, evil words and servants of GOD come from Heaven. This does not justify your acceptance of them over the Specific Word of GOD. This story from the Old Testament is a good example of being proven against the Specific Word of GOD. Read 1kgs 13, after you read it lets talk about what you experienced as a reader and what it makes you understand.
Because I have explained once before, “you can learn from Dark Teachers” but as soon as they began proving you against GOD by teaching out of harmony with GOD you must be able to understand and reject those specific teachings as you are a Servant of GOD not the Dark Teacher or lesser gods.
Thanks………….
The simple Biblical answer is GOD created the Caucasian to fulfill the chastisement and judgment placed upon the African race for rejecting and despising his LAW and Covenant. All of this is apart of our ancestral agreement with GOD, it is in the Contract.
2Sam:7:14: I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men:
GOD is telling you HIS method of chastising us for commiting iniquity. This was already understood, as Nations HE would send against us for when we started breaking the Covenant.
Deut:28:48: Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the LORD shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee
That was fulfilled through the Caucasian conquest of Civilizations before him and Nebuchadnezzar destroying The Temple of GOD started it all. He made way for the Heathen to reign in the earth.
Music Producer,
I read and understood I KINGS 13, having read it many times before, per, the markings and highlights in my Bible, I am all to aware of the particular sin of Jerboam and the teachers of light and dark.
To me, this is a milk bible study you have offered. Thanks be to GOD, I am of full age and by reason of use my senses-exercised to discern both good and evil.
But, nevertheless, I will entertain you with this, if need be.
However, this quote from you strikes me as strange:
"Your only excuse is prejudice, to see the full scope of the Supreme Being this is an emotion you must do away with because the Supreme Being is the same Being in Egyptian theology just as in the KJV Bible because there can only be One Supreme Being. This is why you are unable to debate and defend you perception beyond the KJV Bible. You perception of the Supreme Being must be able to reach beyond the KJV Bible because GOD and man existed and had a working relationship before the KJV Bible was written in it current entirety."
You almost sound like Keita, towards the King James Bible. Or have you deceived me into thinking you were a proponent of the King James?
Sincerely,
Clyde