Let's deal with letter O first. You write:
"Further more it isn't my moral character we are looking at is it, it is Omarosa's."
I think the curiosity lay more about your moral compass, which dictates your moral character. That is to say, upon what spiritual authority are you rolling with which permits you to express hostility toward Queen Omarosa?
Even though you have been giving ample opportunities to cite something, a footnote, a sentence, a piece of a sliver of a small morsel of a little bit which supports your aversion against Queen Omarosa, it's becoming more and more clear that you are unable to deliver.
And don't feel bad because everyone who walked in this room caping for her desecration sits in the same class as you: Beyond the superficial and the petty, neither of you have a logical response to justify the hostility shown Queen Omarosa.
In you not doing so, you demonstrate a key argument which I had been advancing: this implacable hostility toward Queen Omarosa is illogical. It simply doesn't make sense.
Mr. Watkins seems to be ensnared in the same trap. And perhaps his guilt or some other reason had caused him to make a second video about Queen Omarosa because he wasn't getting the reception he thought he would get in the first one:
View attachment 13242
And in the second video, he brought a Black Woman on to support his thesis against Queen Omarosa. Remember what we said about him, he's slick about his. We'll integrate the details of that video later.
But all of this combined is to show that when you decipher this twisted phenomenon...when you dismantle its structure piece by piece as we have done here, you begin to realize this hatred many of us are carrying for our Black Women is unfounded and rooted in things that don't make sense.
Think about it. Notice how all of this time you haven't once dropped a citation as to how you were empowered to push Queen Omarosa off the cliff. You cannot provide any documentation or any type of evidence whatsoever--based on the legacies of Ogoun--which may satisfy curious minds as to how you developed your hostility toward this Queen.
You wrote this:
Once AGAIN perfection I directed your attention to my avatar name so that you might understand better why my references to the dog were not the slur you seem to think it was. [Ja].
Could it be you're starting to walk back the tone by which you attacked Queen Omarosa because you're starting to see my point is valid?
All of that, every single bit of it has been asked and answered already. And much of it more than twice and three times. To start all over again would be just a redundant exercise.
Except for your last question;
Could it be you're starting to walk back the tone by which you attacked Queen Omarosa because you're starting to see my point is valid?
Don't be tone deaf, I'll not invite or accept a reptilian white soul into family no matter what gender.
But you're welcome to that vapid empty vessel that poses as a human, I want no part of her.
Does that sound like I'm walking anything back?
Last edited: