- Aug 21, 2012
- 2,169
- 579
When are some of these brothas gone learn?
One would think that Mr. Watkins would know better. In a youtube video published on August 20, 2018 and entitled, Omarosa looks crazy, stupid and desperate chasing after Trump he offers his listeners an earful of tempered rage, gangsta-rappa-like disrespect towards a Black Woman and typical justifications as to why yet another black man chooses to throw dirt on one of our Queens---in this case, toward the Queen Omarosa Onee Manigault-Newman.
From the gate, let me say I am not saying it is disrespectful or one doesn’t love Black Women if you take issue with her brand of politics. In fact, some of his arguments could have been at least seemingly reasonable had he chosen to stay focused on her actions, rather than him channeling the dead spirits of the former enslavers.
As most of his vitriol for Queen Omarosa is at the front end of his twaddle, what I saw and heard was a man almost honored to add his name to the list of brothas who choose to denigrate instead of uplifting our Black Women.
What a shame.
Am I saying he’s a bad person? I don't know him personally, but offering him the BOD, I would say no, because, like the rest of us, he contributes to the village. But he must be checked so that a message can be sent and projected: Dissing Black Women Must Come to an End.
So the way he carried on in this vid, if you didn’t hear it coming from his lips, you would think you were hearing from that 90s vulgar rapper Too Short, or, at a minimum you would compare his words to a 17th slavemaster describing one of his “negresses” in the field.
“Omarosa,” says Mr. Watkins, “is nasty and…dirty.”
Think about that.” Nasty and dirty.” These are two adjectives that Mr. Watkins elects to describe a Queen, a Black Woman.
So we know Mr. Watkins feels comfortable with “nasty and dirty” when he’s describing a Black Woman. But what he’s going to tell you is that we’re mistaken and that he was using those terms as descriptions of how she conducts her politics i.e., she plays “dirty.”
Yea whatever, but how then would he argue applying “nasty”? And peep this, we haven’t even touched on his use of the “B” word or even the other cruel names he put on our Queen.
You see, despite Mr. Watkins appearance that he’s well-versed in American oppression we see instead Mr. Watkins’ obvious historical deficit which manifest itself in his disrespect for Queen Omarosa. Put another way, if you know, understand and accept the great chronicles of your ancestors, you would never call a Black Woman a “B,” because you know that’s a word associated with black oppression.
You would also know that neither words like “nasty” and “dirty” should be found in your personal lexicons when describing Black Women.
May I draw your attention to De Bow’s Review (1860), Volume 28, page 730 where the author, from their perspective, describes black people:
They talk contemptuously of the pure blacks, whom they describe as dirty [n-word], and nasty [n-word].
By attacking our Black Women, Mr. Watkins apparently doesn’t see he’s keeping in-tact the very brutal structure he claims he’s liberating people from.
One would think that Mr. Watkins would know better. In a youtube video published on August 20, 2018 and entitled, Omarosa looks crazy, stupid and desperate chasing after Trump he offers his listeners an earful of tempered rage, gangsta-rappa-like disrespect towards a Black Woman and typical justifications as to why yet another black man chooses to throw dirt on one of our Queens---in this case, toward the Queen Omarosa Onee Manigault-Newman.
From the gate, let me say I am not saying it is disrespectful or one doesn’t love Black Women if you take issue with her brand of politics. In fact, some of his arguments could have been at least seemingly reasonable had he chosen to stay focused on her actions, rather than him channeling the dead spirits of the former enslavers.
As most of his vitriol for Queen Omarosa is at the front end of his twaddle, what I saw and heard was a man almost honored to add his name to the list of brothas who choose to denigrate instead of uplifting our Black Women.
What a shame.
Am I saying he’s a bad person? I don't know him personally, but offering him the BOD, I would say no, because, like the rest of us, he contributes to the village. But he must be checked so that a message can be sent and projected: Dissing Black Women Must Come to an End.
So the way he carried on in this vid, if you didn’t hear it coming from his lips, you would think you were hearing from that 90s vulgar rapper Too Short, or, at a minimum you would compare his words to a 17th slavemaster describing one of his “negresses” in the field.
“Omarosa,” says Mr. Watkins, “is nasty and…dirty.”
Think about that.” Nasty and dirty.” These are two adjectives that Mr. Watkins elects to describe a Queen, a Black Woman.
So we know Mr. Watkins feels comfortable with “nasty and dirty” when he’s describing a Black Woman. But what he’s going to tell you is that we’re mistaken and that he was using those terms as descriptions of how she conducts her politics i.e., she plays “dirty.”
Yea whatever, but how then would he argue applying “nasty”? And peep this, we haven’t even touched on his use of the “B” word or even the other cruel names he put on our Queen.
You see, despite Mr. Watkins appearance that he’s well-versed in American oppression we see instead Mr. Watkins’ obvious historical deficit which manifest itself in his disrespect for Queen Omarosa. Put another way, if you know, understand and accept the great chronicles of your ancestors, you would never call a Black Woman a “B,” because you know that’s a word associated with black oppression.
You would also know that neither words like “nasty” and “dirty” should be found in your personal lexicons when describing Black Women.
May I draw your attention to De Bow’s Review (1860), Volume 28, page 730 where the author, from their perspective, describes black people:
They talk contemptuously of the pure blacks, whom they describe as dirty [n-word], and nasty [n-word].
By attacking our Black Women, Mr. Watkins apparently doesn’t see he’s keeping in-tact the very brutal structure he claims he’s liberating people from.
... please make yourself at home ... 