Black Spirituality Religion : Black Man PROVES Adam and Eve Biblical Story is a LIE : His DNA Dates Back 338 THOUSAND YEARS!

I'm Becoming Me

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
Jul 6, 2013
1,504
1,183
Occupation
Lover & Fighter...
I personally don't believe that a man gave birth to a woman. The rib story is saying exactly that, just not in the sense of an actual birth.

Men wrote the bible, so of course God is a man, "he"..and man had to have given birth to the woman and not other way around.

I believe God is Female energy. The Mother. The birther. The one who creates life.

My two cents...
 

willa

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
Apr 7, 2013
2,402
1,238
...


This, is a very nice write-up willa, which purports an "
old earth point of view" at its core. Be mindful that many Christians hold to a "young earth" position.

When we chase down "rabbit holes," often we will contraindicate the Bible's interpretation of itself, in order to get around a particular argument; as in this case, to argue against the inconclusive premise that someone's DNA is older than Adam's.



"Black Man PROVES Adam and Eve Biblical Story is a LIE : His DNA Dates Back 338 THOUSAND YEARS!"


vs


"What is 338k years compared to everything else?"

"I agree with John X Brown, that this earth by the dust it was made from could be dated beyond "billions" even"

"Therefore, the body of Adam, and his wife's body who was cloned from his rib could date back endlessly"

"Also, when the earth is dated past seven thousand years in scientific carbon dating, we ask why not, when the elements of it's creation are ageless?"



Remember willa, we, or in this case, you only have the Bible to depend upon, which isn't date specific, and causes the believer to often stumble ...

Hello, :SuN040:

Let me come in from a different witness point of view then. That of DNA. There is a model rule how to date the age people lived in by their Mitochondria generics dna passed from mothers to offspring, carried again in daughters. Science has also dated the age of man on this earth trough dating the age of people, and has come up with people's bone age being two or three hundred, thousand years. The problem was finding a man with written record of his birth being far enough in the past to compare dna with what is supposed regarding time to today. For this cause was a Russian Czar exhumed in the way-back time. It was discovered that his dna age was found to be 26 times faster than what science had established when they put the Czar at 250,000 years old. Which he was not. So, using this information of 26 times faster than what science has said, would put the Czar at his right age and the world in its end of 6000 years by 2007.

The reason why science could err that much is because many times scientists, not science, are godless, and therefore they will dismiss data to enhance theory. As far as they are concerned, they do not want to encourage the knowledge of God, as that would in their minds create an obligation for themselves to have to believe, and make themselves in the public view less awesome.

This also is true through the creation of this earth by the elements of the ageless universe makes it old and yet, the actual dating through DNA, young, compared to mankind for which the earth was created going on 7000 years, counting the 7th day of rest -- 1ooo years.
 

Clyde C Coger Jr

Well-Known Member
PREMIUM MEMBER
Nov 17, 2006
62,839
12,048
www.amazon.com
Occupation
Speaker/Teacher/Author
Hello, :SuN040:

Let me come in from a different witness point of view then. That of DNA. There is a model rule how to date the age people lived in by their Mitochondria generics dna passed from mothers to offspring, carried again in daughters. Science has also dated the age of man on this earth trough dating the age of people, and has come up with people's bone age being two or three hundred, thousand years. The problem was finding a man with written record of his birth being far enough in the past to compare dna with what is supposed regarding time to today. For this cause was a Russian Czar exhumed in the way-back time. It was discovered that his dna age was found to be 26 times faster than what science had established when they put the Czar at 250,000 years old. Which he was not. So, using this information of 26 times faster than what science has said, would put the Czar at his right age and the world in its end of 6000 years by 2007.

The reason why science could err that much is because many times scientists, not science, are godless, and therefore they will dismiss data to enhance theory. As far as they are concerned, they do not want to encourage the knowledge of God, as that would in their minds create an obligation for themselves to have to believe, and make themselves in the public view less awesome.

This also is true through the creation of this earth by the elements of the ageless universe makes it old and yet, the actual dating through DNA, young, compared to mankind for which the earth was created going on 7000 years, counting the 7th day of rest -- 1ooo years.


Please support the statement below with reliable evidence for review:


"For this cause was a Russian Czar exhumed in the way-back time. It was discovered that his dna age was found to be 26 times faster than what science had established when they put the Czar at 250,000 years old."


 

willa

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
Apr 7, 2013
2,402
1,238
Please support the statement below with reliable evidence for review:


"For this cause was a Russian Czar exhumed in the way-back time. It was discovered that his dna age was found to be 26 times faster than what science had established when they put the Czar at 250,000 years old."


It was Czar Nicholas II, comparing his DNA rate of mutation (change) to present progenitors. This challenged the established theories on the calibration of human dna, for which general science said that they have to do a new think, "going back to the bones" with consideration. Journal of Science 1998. With this new study the calibration of African Eve to present day sets her today just over 6,500 years.

Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 7-18 2003
Nature Journal . p 325 Jan. 1. 1987
Science. Vol. 270. 5347. pp 28 - 29
 

Clyde C Coger Jr

Well-Known Member
PREMIUM MEMBER
Nov 17, 2006
62,839
12,048
www.amazon.com
Occupation
Speaker/Teacher/Author
It was Czar Nicholas II, comparing his DNA rate of mutation (change) to present progenitors. This challenged the established theories on the calibration of human dna, for which general science said that they have to do a new think, "going back to the bones" with consideration. Journal of Science 1998. With this new study the calibration of African Eve to present day sets her today just over 6,500 years.

Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 7-18 2003
Nature Journal . p 325 Jan. 1. 1987
Science. Vol. 270. 5347. pp 28 - 29


Thanks willa, let me review this, research it, and get back with you in a couple of days or so, okay?

If this holds up, it becomes a much better argument than what you initially countered with ...




 

Is Trump Going to Prison?

  • yes

  • no


Results are only viewable after voting.

Latest profile posts

Kemetstry wrote on Destee's profile.
still can't post polls


.
Kemetstry wrote on Destee's profile.
What ever you've done, you can no longer post to the kitchen table
Top