Black Spirituality Religion : Bible Prophecies of Muhammad (part 1 of 4): Witnesses of Scholars

[abdurratln]

Read a good translation of Quran. Do not rely on what people tell you it is about. Come andfind out for yourself. Each of us must face GOD and account for what He Has Told us. We do not need priests and such. It has been Revealed in such a way that about everyone can understand it. And, everyone is individually and personally accountable for what is in it. And playing ignorant will not be acceptable. If you do not know, find out. That is the only way. And, it is my duty to inform you of that much. After this, it is up to you.

 

[cherryblossom]

Abdurratln, I am not going to go back-and-forth with you.

I am through with this discussion with you.

However, let me share some "constructive criticism" with you....

You are missing some things because you are not paying attention. Then, you accuse others of some kind of "Tricknology" against you because you misunderstood or you missed something.

What "source"? Show us.

HERE IS THAT POST: http://destee.com/forums/showpost.php?p=665281&postcount=20

CLICK ON THIS THREAD. It will take you to my POST.

In that post, I gave the LINK to the SITE where I got that quote from.

Then, CLICK ON THE LINK in my POST.

THAT IS THE SOURCE WHERE I GOT IT FROM.

 

[cherryblossom]

Originally Posted by cherryblossom
http://www.answering-islam.org/BibleCom/is29-12.html

And what quote is this? ...

And you misunderstood this one as well.

That LINK was in my POST from the SOURCE where I got the quote from.

Here is that post: http://destee.com/forums/showpost.php?p=665942&postcount=7

I always give the link to any site I use. If I did not write it, I give the link to the source.

 

[abdurratln]

Abdurratln, I am not going to go back-and-forth with you.

I am through with this discussion with you.

However, let me share some "constructive criticism" with you....

You are missing some things because you are not paying attention. Then, you accuse others of some kind of "Tricknology" against you because you misunderstood or you missed something.








CLICK ON THIS THREAD. It will take you to my POST.

In that post, I gave the LINK to the SITE where I got that quote from.

Then, CLICK ON THE LINK in my POST.

THAT IS THE SOURCE WHERE I GOT IT FROM.

Sorry. I just won't let you get away with it. I cannot recall all the details exactly. But, what I intend to do is go back and quote your staement to prove that you did not cite it. This citation here has nothing to do with the issue I am raising. But, please notice that I did not call you a liar. I just think you are most likely simply mistaken. So, I will try to clear this up for you. But, I am not optimistic about your spirit of cooperation.

 

[abdurratln]

Here you cite youtube for whatever reason:
This citation has to do with some archaeological wall built. This is not what we are talking about.
Here you cite a definition for Ahmed. I especially appreciate this one because it helped to prove my point:

AHMAD
Gender: Male
Origin: Arabic
Meaning: Greatly Praised

AHMED
Gender: Male
Origin: Arabic
Meaning: Greatly Praised
http://www.zelo.com/firstnames/findresults.asp?name=AHMED

Now show us ANY CITATION stating that Ahmed does not mean Muhammad. You did not do it and you know you did not do it:

You play the "dumb role" very well.
You know good-and-well that you LIED
"AHMED" IS NOT IN THE BIBLE and you know it.
You LIED.