- Aug 21, 2012
There's no need to be nervous Brotha as you're amongst friends. The two questions I'm putting forth serve a couple of purposes. First, it stops me at the gate from assuming I know what group, or the "we", from which you refer because that could be the basis of my observing your faulty premises.Brother Perfection, don't play naive man. If you read the entire post it is clear you know who the we is otherwise you wouldn't have made these statements below.
If you offer better premises, perhaps your argument could be more cogent. Unfortunately, the 12 premises (what you call "areas") chosen by you to support your argument fails.
I think you're getting a few basics confused.
I'm going to out a few areas in which we have major differences.
I expect there to be differences..
I asked you to (Please feel free to share with the folks what you believe and what these few basics are that I'm getting confused).
Secondly, once I begin to reveal to you how you're deeply mistaken in your premises, your errors can be excused based on how you answer the two questions. Therefore, answering the two questions, in large part, benefits you.
So I ask again, please, would you mind defining who "we" is?