it seems the media is having a field day with this down low stuff. now they can blame aids on blck men and feel no backlash. they have alaways done this but ever since that guy wrote his down low book its suddenly a blk thing. is there no such people as liberache, tommy morrison, rockafeller, greg luganis, the dad off of the brady bunch? yet evry report i c is about homosexual blk men, or married blkk men on the down low, like the governer of new jersey never happened. oh well just wanted to vent...lets not forget with all of their statistical bull, wht people comprise the majority of aids cases in this country! according to the cdc white americans infected with aids as of 2002 is...364,458 blk ppl is..347,491 latino....163,940 so if u want 2 believe the cdc wht ppl are the largets number of hiv infected out of any other demograph. yet on their web site (cdc) in their groups at "high risk" category only blks, hispanics are listed as "high risk". and yes i know there r more wht pplin the pop than blks so the percentages blah blah blah, the fact is if u take the cdc 4 their word is the majority of aids victims r wht not blk. so should wht women not be in "fear" of infection from wht men on the down low??? http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats.htm#cumrace http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/surveillance.htm <<notice in their "populations" at risk category wht ppl who r the majority of infected(in the u.s) r not listed! by the way, exactly how accurate is this cdc? they r obviously a racist orginization looking at their web page.