s everything to do with BULLYING which has been made easier now that the USSR is no longer there to counter the USA along with China now having a vested interest in keeping the USA's economy goingAren't these situations everything to do with BULLYING which has been made easier now that the USSR is no longer there to counter the USA along with China now having a vested interest in keeping the USA's economy going as opposed to its previous focus on confrontation/destruction as highlighted to my post [below] on the Daily Mail UK's News message board?
Thomas20111 wrote {quote}Why does Iran want a nuclear bomb? That is where we have to start off this debate from.
The same reason India and Pakistan has the bomb - both were and still are enemies in a way - so if one has such a device the other felt they needed a nuclear arsenal to protect themselves. {quote} Doesn’t the chaotic carnage in Iraq and Libya today underline exactly why China, India, Pakistan and even Japan and South Korea are members of the nuclear arms club, without the BIG STICK aren’t you wide open to divisive military power plays from the West in general, the USA in particular? {quote}So as it can be taken Israel has the bomb and the US shows open hatred to Iran, then Iranians must feel they need some form of nuclear deterrent. {quote} During their last standoff during their ongoing dispute over Kashmir the West counselled India and Pakistan to give up their nuclear arms to stop this conflict escalating into a nuclear war, thus who was surprised when they responded with “WE’LL GIVE UP OUR NUCLEAR WEAPONS WHEN YOU GIVE UP YOURS”? {quote}Maybe if the US had taken a softer line against the Iranian government after The Shah was ousted from the Peacock Throne, then we would not be in this position today.
We have to remember that The Shah and his abuse of human rights was no better than the present Iranian government - it's just that he was Uncle Sam's man and his misdeeds were overlooked. {quote} Probably, but even as a supposedly Western puppet the Shah had built Iran’s military up to a level that gave Iran the option of overrunning the whole region which is why the CIA sanctioned him being toppled, creating the political vacuum that was subsequently filled by the MAD MULLAHS, thus how well did that attempt at Machiavellian manipulation by the USA work out [wouldn’t it be great if the Yanks were even 10% as intelligent as they think they are]?
Isn't anyone who genuinely believes they are not programmedgraphically illustrating that their programming is COMPLETE?
Thomas20111 wrote {quote} Admittedly since the Ayatollah came to power Iran's foreign policy leaves much to be desired - but it could have been handled better - much better. Britain, France, Germany and other prominent players in world affairs stood back and said nothing about America's extreme bullying on Iran. Maybe if there had not been such political hostility by the US then the moderates in Iran would be in power today. {quote} Maybe, maybe not but what about the way Saddarm’s Iraq was built up and armed to supposedly CRUSH Iran thus creating a conflict that cost a million lives but also gave Saddam the option of militarily overrunning the region including Saudi Arabia which led to the two military expeditions and current chaotic carnage ongoing grief in Iraq TODAY? {quote}So what we have if a militant Iranian government that will not lose face by stepping back from their proposed nuclear dream and as they are in close contact with many militant terrorist groups around the world there is no guarantee that such nuclear devices will not fall into terrorist's hand. But is it not the same with Pakistan? {quote} EXACTLY, but Pakistan hasn’t got the second largest oil reserves on the planet for BIG OIL and the and the Banksters to loot/control [prevent from being traded directly with Asia cutting the USA/West out of the loop altogether] in stark contrast to the total control the Iranians have of both their oil production and reserves? {quote}America could not tell the Pakistanis that they were going into their country to take out Bin Laden because they could not trust those at the top of Pakistan's government. {quote} Possibly, but how would the USA, UK or any western country react to a Pakistan’s special forces unit sneaking into their country and subsequently executing someone they were after on their soil, if that along with these unmanned drone attacks isn’t a blatant violation of sovereignty, what is it [apart from an obvious war crime/human rights violation to be executing ANYONE without trial]?
Isn't anyone who genuinely believes they are not programmedgraphically illustrating that their programming is COMPLETE?
That is the root of the tree! The loan shark seeks to protect the high society dopefiends crimin and corruption
and like the movie Equilibrium, they seek today, to label every simple aggresive act of children "bullying" so they can continue bullying , unimpeded by a docile citizenry tomorrow!