I was reading this trying to figure out what was the CJS "Collective Jewish System"... smh @ mind thoughts.
Glad I was finally able to see it within your comments, smh @ the mind is an interesting thing at times I tell ya lol.
For the thesis of the "incentive" that one asked about in the OP, here is what they would appear to be from an exterior point of view looking in... of course, politricks is politricks.
Incentive for ensure "black prosperity" (paraphrasing a bit)
Shillary (also called Hillerig) Clinton:
No idea really, honestly no idea.
Bernie Colonel Sanders:
His self proclaimed "Civil Rights Legacy" will be on the line
Donald Trumpcard (also called Frump, chuckle everytime):
His business credentials and pride will be on the line, if the economy, jobs, and social justice don't increase, he will have to leave the country due to the shame of a major business plan failure.
Long and short of it is... if any of these fail at doing anything in any progressive way to better people's opportunities and experience in this land, then it really doesn't say much.
The two things people are considering...
Will things get better or worse?
Bush was re-sElected... how much worse do people have to get until they realize "they don't care"?
Trump seems to have been an unexpected loophole in the GOP, as he could be some weirded out Trojan horse similar to Bernie Sanders.
When people speak loud and definitive about things over and over, their credibility is at stake.
Not too many people believe much of what comes out of Obama's mouth at the moment, or even what goes into it (Flint drinking water fake sip event).
So when the lies start to come out and unravel these politricksters, it's best to look at which ones are spewing the least lies or deceit.
We all should have our deceit radar on by now, but for those that don't, some of this could be their wake up or initiation into the world of the aware (everyone in their own time).
This is a scale I would call the
"BLACKLIE-RADAR"
It gives a level of 1 to 50, the level to which these have the propensity for lying and/or deceiving people:
- Clinton - 40
- Trump - 35
- Sanders - 20
- Sanders really is as clean as it comes, aside from the Federal Reserve Audit issue. But being a politician gets a 15 by default.
- Clinton just seems to look like she is lying anytime she speaks. That authentic thing she is missing hurts her severely, even if she may be truthful in her candor.
- Trump has the ability to manipulate things in his favor, which is akin to cheating or lying. He seems very meticulous in his attempts to say exactly what he means, which allows him to get away with some "sneaky" stuff. He is a tricky one, and one that should be watched when it comes to schemes and attempted actions.
The other question is, why do they want to be "pResident"?
Trump:
It was made clear that Trump was running not as a serious contender, but as a “protest” candidate.
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/03/28/Ex-Trump-Insider-Donald-Doesn-t-Want-Be-President
Clinton:
"I want to be pResident because I want to build on the progress that we've been making and make it possible for more people in our country, particularly young people to live up to their own god given potential. And that means we've got to get back to providing opportunities. We've got to get back to making the economy work for everybody. And we have to defend the progress we made in women's rights, and gay rights, and we have to protect voting rights, and immigrant rights, and everything else."
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...he-late-show-why-i-want-to-be-president-video
Sanders:
Others
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ympF6aNWK7E
www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7jlAZSGXf4
www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3mvbxeA1UA
Not sure what this all means in regards to who has more incentive, but the whole perspective of what these candidates think they actually want to do vs. what they think they can actually do vs what they can actually do and get done.