- Feb 26, 2013
- 6,745
- 3,126
DANIEL 1:4 says that Daniel had an understanding of science, but again we can disagree, however you need to back up what you say by scripture even if you don't want to acknowledge scolarship.
No, the Bible does not say that white skin is leprous, I remember when it said that 'Moses' hand turned as white as snow, and miriam became leprous, and white, but ti never says that White skin is leprous. Leprosy is a disease. when both Moses and Miriam healed, they were not White anymore! When you say,
will only keep you from hearing what I say
...I think that sums it all up in what you are saying, nothing you have said is back up by scriptures, nothing. but I will wait to see your scripture references on Ham being white, Canaan being white, Cain's descendants being killed off because he killed Abel. I'd love to see your scripture references since you don't regard any scholars, secular education, science...
Wow!
edited;
Also, from what i remember sister cherry pulling up out of the Bible and other references too, it supports the Bible in that LEPROSY is a disease to the affect that if Moses and Miriam did not heal after a certain time, then they would have gotten worse because leprosy ROTS THE SKIN. The Bible puts out much information about 'leprosy' for example, a king of the Jews, a good king at that, did something that he shouldn't have done, and tried to take over the high priesthood, and he was struck with LEPROSY, and he did not heal, therefore, he sone had to take over, and he was PERMANENTLY SEPARATED AND HAD TO LIVE IN A SEVERAL HOUSE UNTIL HE DIED. i WILL post this edited response again so you can see that i have addes to this post.
I know Daniel had understanding in TRUE science but have you not read Paul's writing wherin he was stating how they began to change what was called science? Thus, you could trust science no longer?
And no, it does not state word for word, "leprosy is white skin", but by understanding, you can see white skin is leprosy; if it covered the WHOLE BODY like it does for whites this day, it was called clean, as is in Scriptures. And as I said, you still won't hear. I never stated Ham was white; you are twisting my words. I stated a particular line of his descendants were leprous, the Canaanites. All was not mentioned exactly in Scriptures as we see it today because we are still supposed to show righteous judgments in these according to what was back then. Now, you may say nothing in Scriptures backs what I say, but I don't need to be justified by your words for the truth I'm telling you. It is all there if you will see, but it seems you will not as you have taken my own words and distorted them and couldn't understand; how will you keep from doing so to the Father's Word which isn't made plain for all to see as I wrote to you just now?
If the point be lost on you, I can do nothing more, but pray the Father's forgiveness for where I have done wrong.