Omowale Jabali : Yeshua (Jesus) the "Black" Messiah?

Music Producer said:
So are you saying this verse….

Mt:1:23: Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

and this verse…..

Isa:7:14: Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

is a lie and are in no way linked to one another?
Is that what you are trying to say?

And also when you say Isaiah could not have given the account of Jesus’ birth, you are making an incorrect statement because Isaiah never did give the account, GOD did.

If GOD did give account of Jesus' birth then my statement is CORRECT because Isaiah could NOT have given account which is why your quoting Isaiah is irrelevant because it is a PROPHETIC STATEMENT...
 
omowalejabali said:
"Did you know the Trinity theory is written on the tomb walls of Tutankhamun about 2000 years before the white man altered it and shoved it in your face?"


My SUPREME KNOWLEDGE is from the ETHIOPIAN Kebra Negast and has been passed down through the Solomonic Line of SHOA through Queen Bezabech Wolde...
When you have to evade basic Scriptural questions and bounce around the Word of GOD because you don’t know the answer or realize that the answered would disrupt what you have been made to believe, it means you have strayed so far from GOD that your belief system is no longer dependant nor explainable through the Word of GOD.

That is the same error that our ancestor made in the Old Testament. They picked up belief systems that contended with GOD. Israel and Judah were destroyed no once but over and over and over, but yet you tell me Jesus saved them.

You don’t see that you are ministering what the white man wants you to believe. Any form of Jesus worship is the continuation of Babylon and the reign of the white man because your head is bowed to their god, not yours.

Your perception of things is not based on the Will of GOD and that is why you think Jesus was a Messiah. Jesus was the Messiah to the Gentiles and the head of their reign in the earth. Jesus is a continuation of Babylon. That’s why we see in Revelations and Angel talking about the fall of Babylon 300 years or so after Babylon already fell.

Rv:14:8: And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.

The fornication of Babylon is Jesus worship in any form rather it be African or Caucasian.
The New Testament is the works to keep Israel and Judah ignorant of The GOD of the Old Testament.

Otherwise answer the questions that I have put to you, preacher maaaaan.
 
omowalejabali said:
If GOD did give account of Jesus' birth then my statement is CORRECT because Isaiah could NOT have given account which is why your quoting Isaiah is irrelevant because it is a PROPHETIC STATEMENT...
Your statement is not correct because once again you are evading the text as it makes a clear reference to a specific event in history as coexisting when Jesus was a baby. So once again I will ask you, when did the Assyrian Empire fall to the rise of the Babylonian Empire?

When you eventually answer that question you will be answering the time period of Jesus’ true birth record.

Jesus existing during the Roman Empire is a lie and I have proven it to be a lie with the Specific Word of GOD. And now all you can do is evade The Gospel of the Father because you are STUCK in between what the white man tells you through the New Testament and what GOD Himself tells you in the Old Testament. Your actions remind me of this verse……..

1Kgs:18:21: And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word.

Over 3000 years have passed and we ain’t changed a bit. Running around the earth lifting up the god of the Gentiles (white man), because he saith so.
Just because you have reconfigured Jesus to be a black man it don’t change the gospel.

Deut:28:63: And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it.

The latter of that passage is fulfilled through Jesus and the New Testament. GOD would not send a Saviour while we are in a broken Covenant and ignorant of that Covenant. HE would send us a Destroyer because we broke the Covenant and serve other gods. That is the whole Logic.
 
AN AFRICAN ACCOUNT OF THE DAVIDIC LINE

Music Producer said:
When you have to evade basic Scriptural questions and bounce around the Word of GOD because you don’t know the answer or realize that the answered would disrupt what you have been made to believe, it means you have strayed so far from GOD that your belief system is no longer dependant nor explainable through the Word of GOD.

That is the same error that our ancestor made in the Old Testament. They picked up belief systems that contended with GOD. Israel and Judah were destroyed no once but over and over and over, but yet you tell me Jesus saved them.

You don’t see that you are ministering what the white man wants you to believe. Any form of Jesus worship is the continuation of Babylon and the reign of the white man because your head is bowed to their god, not yours.

Your perception of things is not based on the Will of GOD and that is why you think Jesus was a Messiah. Jesus was the Messiah to the Gentiles and the head of their reign in the earth. Jesus is a continuation of Babylon. That’s why we see in Revelations and Angel talking about the fall of Babylon 300 years or so after Babylon already fell.

Rv:14:8: And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.

The fornication of Babylon is Jesus worship in any form rather it be African or Caucasian.
The New Testament is the works to keep Israel and Judah ignorant of The GOD of the Old Testament.

Otherwise answer the questions that I have put to you, preacher maaaaan.


"The fornication of Babylon is Jesus worship in any form rather it be African or Caucasian.
The New Testament is the works to keep Israel and Judah ignorant of The GOD of the Old Testament."


"Otherwise answer the questions that I have put to you, preacher Maaaaaan."

I am not subject to YOUR command regardless of how much YOU consider YOUR rantings to be the "Word of GOD".

I AM a Lion not a lamb, and My WORD is My BOND and with this said I proceed to the TRUE "Word of GOD" according to MY Ethiopian tradition,

The KEBRA NAGAST is a great storehouse of legends AND traditions, some historical and some purely folk-lore character derived from the OT and later Rabbinic writings, and from Egyptian, Arabian and Ethiopian sources. Of the early history of the compilation and its maker, and of its subsequent editors we know little, but the principal groundwork of its earliest form was the traditions that were current in Syria, Palestine, Arabia, and Egyot during the first FOUR centuries of the Christian era. Weighing carefully all that has been written it seems likely that the composition of the earliest form of the KEBRA NAGAST to the 6th century AD. Its compilers most likely were Coptic priests for the books used were writings that were accepted by the Coptic Church. Whether the compiler(s) lived in Egypt, or in AKSUM, or in some other part of ETHIOPIA amtters little, but the colophons of the extant Ethiopic MSS of the KEBRA NAGAST suggest it was written in COPTIC.
 
Music Producer said:
Your statement is not correct because once again you are evading the text as it makes a clear reference to a specific event in history as coexisting when Jesus was a baby. So once again I will ask you, when did the Assyrian Empire fall to the rise of the Babylonian Empire?

When you eventually answer that question you will be answering the time period of Jesus’ true birth record.

Jesus existing during the Roman Empire is a lie and I have proven it to be a lie with the Specific Word of GOD. And now all you can do is evade The Gospel of the Father because you are STUCK in between what the white man tells you through the New Testament and what GOD Himself tells you in the Old Testament. Your actions remind me of this verse……..

1Kgs:18:21: And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word.

Over 3000 years have passed and we ain’t changed a bit. Running around the earth lifting up the god of the Gentiles (white man), because he saith so.
Just because you have reconfigured Jesus to be a black man it don’t change the gospel.

Deut:28:63: And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it.

The latter of that passage is fulfilled through Jesus and the New Testament. GOD would not send a Saviour while we are in a broken Covenant and ignorant of that Covenant. HE would send us a Destroyer because we broke the Covenant and serve other gods. That is the whole Logic.

In reference to the untruth being propagated to the effect that "Running around the earth lifting up the god of the Gentiles (white man), because he saith so",

There is an extant in ETHIOPIAN LITERATURE a legend to the effect that when GOD made ADAM He placed in his body a "Pearl", which He intended should pass from it into the bodies of a series of holy men, one after the other, until the appointed time when it should enter the body of ANNA, and form the substance of her daughter the VIRGIN MARY. Now this "Pearl" passed through the body of SOLOMON, an ancestor of CHRIST, and CHRIST and MENYELEK, the son of SOLOMON by Makeda,, Queen of SHEBA (Saba), were Sons of Solomon, and according to ETHIOPIAN ideas they were akin to each other. But CHRIST was the Son of GOD, and, therefore, being the kinsman of CHRIST, MENYELEK was DIVINE.

And ISAAC the Ethiopian, holding this view, maintains in the KEBRA NAGAST that the Kings of ETHIOPIA who were descended from MENYELEK were of Divine Origin, and their words and deeds were those of GODS...

Source, "Preface to the First Edition, KEBRA NAGAST.
 

Donate

Support destee.com, the oldest, most respectful, online black community in the world - PayPal or CashApp

Latest profile posts

HODEE wrote on Etophil's profile.
Welcome to Destee
@Etophil
Destee wrote on SleezyBigSlim's profile.
Hi @SleezyBigSlim ... Welcome Welcome Welcome ... :flowers: ... please make yourself at home ... :swings:
Back
Top