Black Short Stories : A woman ought to know her Place!

May I send you a Play to read for your specific analysis? The title is 'melchizedek' and I am not sure there is a play titled with that name..would you critique and or correct?
I do not mean to lecture
...I say as much to point out one thing: The original language of the scriptures explains what we think is inside of psychology and sociology and psychiatry and politically correct...which really justify our breaks and departures from The Truth of The Most High. But tell me... have I offended any homosexuals, men or women?
I am not a professional writer but perhaps you are a professional reader. so clearly state the problem to me. You have it in MY WORDS my intention for the play and the theme of the play.
I will not think that you are defending homosexuality through my bad misleading title..I feel like there is no definition of femininity that rivals Delicacy. If there is give it to me. Or you write under the title you suggest I change and allow me to respond to you.
if you are defending homosexuality then state that and with your approval/permission I will respond.
Nonetheless... I mean nor intend any disrespect or offense to anyone by the Play.
while I have the ear of a member..I have posted several essays on the Islamic group web page. 1). the bid'a of Muhammad and 2). to prey or not to pray..would you remove the names that are listed as the author? They are indeed mine. In fact I posted a Play concerning Islaam on That page ..have you read it? if you have not will you please read it and tell me what you think?


In no way am I defending homosexuality, it is an abomination before God ...

"If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination.
They shall surely be put to death.
Their blood shall be upon them."
(Leviticus 20:13)

You may not be a professional writer Taahir, but I am ... Click here.


Lets be clear, are these your words below?


"The theme is that homosexuals try to emulate delicacy and it belongs SOLELY to women."

Then the title change I suggested fits, and would prevent any misunderstanding.

As far as the solicitations you've made of me, I'll pass. There isn't much in the Bible or Qur'an that gets pass me.

...

 
I may be out of place here but:
You Go too far...Don't be afraid..I was trying to be provocative, funny...I know my posts are long-winded..which means annoying. Hoping that someone who has read my posts would see this play and read it..is the only reason I put that there,, you really Go too far..
I know that you see the 'twist'... as in homosexuals pointing out the meaning of femininity..for a straight man to do it I thought would be boring..no more or less..again, you have not pointed out the offense.
No I am not selling anything on this site. I have indeed approached " Destee" concerning advertisement. I have not received a response. I post to this site for academic censure, opinion, correction. I am a linguist, not a writer but as you have mentioned my posts are exhaustive. Moreso out of training for clarity. I truly hope I am clear and that I do impart something a person can use..
Insofar as religion I don't have one. Nor Is Al Islaam a candidate for its definition (religion) according to the original language which is the basis of all of my writing: there is much we do not know (being American born/bred) of the Holy Bible and Qur'aan and it is underneath the translations in the original language. plus its easier to learn than one might think or has been told.
You are incorrect in the meaning of my name. which means you are inconsiderate; and perhaps think that it could be summed up in a quick peek in a dictionary or google? It 'implies' neither peace or guidance.. Look how you've done my name only to slap me in the face with it...yet even still you have not pointed out the thing in my play that has offended you. why are you being this way? By Most High I simply mean that being that Creates and was not created..being sensitive to others idea, or lack of one, of The Most High. and The Name " The Most High " is an actual name of The Most High..
you go too far...I ask you to point out my bad writing or the offensive you find in it. Instead you rake me over the coals...without even mentioning why. Now, I can't account for you feeling like a child when you read something I have written.. but if you do, so what? we are all hear to learn from each other and if you feel like a child then appreciate that sensation..many people cannot learn because they fear opening their mind to information that may be foreign or disturbing..However it is not a child that is in my mind when I write..nor is the audience the only matter to tend to. there is a standard of writing that must be anchored in truth.. ill not exaggerate to make a point nor lie just to get it across..and if you think the play is on the road to bash homosexuality...you have gone too far..let me share something with you that inspired the play ( go ahead a breath a ' here we go again' breath. I'll wait.
The Bible says, in English, Eve was created from the rib. Not so, the word in the original text is the " fluid in the bone " the reference was to cerebral spinal fluid...the rib(s) are all extensions of the spine...but this isn't pointed out in church or the seminary... the word for 'cerebral spinal fluid ' and 'delicacy' flow from the same root in the original language! so Delicacy is not just an arbitrary adjective 'we humans' use whenever we want. we can... but it is a noun and a verb and has a meaning. The way dirt had a meaning before it was used to fashion Adam's body.. so the play was inspired to be written to elucidate the meaning and applicability of a word : delicacy. " Straight Men " preachers, etc...have all used woman and the rib to establish patriarchal rule...and the fact that woman is a 'side piece' as it comes to the importance of man. Its been used abusively.. To have the idea of delicacy rehearsed by a man who has decided to abandon " manhood' and all its ******** in order to be closer to the definition of love was the point of homosexuality even being identified. As your response to me even proves, " who the **** wants to listen to man explain anything to anyone about how anything should be?
you really do go too far...aside from all that...will you lean into another Play I have written and give me your opinion..? and don't tell me all this is going to represent is someone with whom you will be forever annoyed with..
1. Your name implies peaceful guidance yet you insult Destee members as if we are children cowering before you in fright and awe by soothing our collective fear of your presence by crooning to us mindless ones not to be afraid. Of what? You? Expressing our opinion(s) in a collective or singular sense to you?

2. If your hawking your books on Destee I believe you need to either read Destee TOS or contact Miss Destee herself to seek approval.

3. Homosexuality is not considered to be abhorrent and deviant behavior worthy of ridicule and at times death here in America like it is in Middle East.

4. You would have lent more credibility to yourself, your cause and more so your sales pitch if you would have presented yourself in a legitimate manner by posting links or outright spelling out what this exhaustive PDF file revealed at the end of whatever you claim it really is.

5. Delicacy describes what one does in a manner conducive to effect an aura in a calming sense. No one race, creed, religion, culture or sex has the right to claim a definition. It is not copyrighted, patented or otherwise owned by anyone person or group.

6. If your religion espouses your most high leader being Hebrew or Arab and is intolerant of homosexuality and those freely practicing such it is now a universally accepted alternate lifestyle as long as it bears no malice to others not accepting it.

7. You'd have a better chance of selling whatever it is your selling by applying to Amazon for permission to have them sell whatever it is your selling, your catalog notwithstanding.

I hope this helps you in some small manner. Good day.
 
I may be out of place here but:
You Go too far...Don't be afraid..I was trying to be provocative, funny...I know my posts are long-winded..which means annoying. Hoping that someone who has read my posts would see this play and read it..is the only reason I put that there,, you really Go too far..
I know that you see the 'twist'... as in homosexuals pointing out the meaning of femininity..for a straight man to do it I thought would be boring..no more or less..again, you have not pointed out the offense.
No I am not selling anything on this site. I have indeed approached " Destee" concerning advertisement. I have not received a response. I post to this site for academic censure, opinion, correction. I am a linguist, not a writer but as you have mentioned my posts are exhaustive. Moreso out of training for clarity. I truly hope I am clear and that I do impart something a person can use..
Insofar as religion I don't have one. Nor Is Al Islaam a candidate for its definition (religion) according to the original language which is the basis of all of my writing: there is much we do not know (being American born/bred) of the Holy Bible and Qur'aan and it is underneath the translations in the original language. plus its easier to learn than one might think or has been told.
You are incorrect in the meaning of my name. which means you are inconsiderate; and perhaps think that it could be summed up in a quick peek in a dictionary or google? It 'implies' neither peace or guidance.. Look how you've done my name only to slap me in the face with it...yet even still you have not pointed out the thing in my play that has offended you. why are you being this way? By Most High I simply mean that being that Creates and was not created..being sensitive to others idea, or lack of one, of The Most High. and The Name " The Most High " is an actual name of The Most High..
you go too far...I ask you to point out my bad writing or the offensive you find in it. Instead you rake me over the coals...without even mentioning why. Now, I can't account for you feeling like a child when you read something I have written.. but if you do, so what? we are all hear to learn from each other and if you feel like a child then appreciate that sensation..many people cannot learn because they fear opening their mind to information that may be foreign or disturbing..However it is not a child that is in my mind when I write..nor is the audience the only matter to tend to. there is a standard of writing that must be anchored in truth.. ill not exaggerate to make a point nor lie just to get it across..and if you think the play is on the road to bash homosexuality...you have gone too far..let me share something with you that inspired the play ( go ahead a breath a ' here we go again' breath. I'll wait.
The Bible says, in English, Eve was created from the rib. Not so, the word in the original text is the " fluid in the bone " the reference was to cerebral spinal fluid...the rib(s) are all extensions of the spine...but this isn't pointed out in church or the seminary... the word for 'cerebral spinal fluid ' and 'delicacy' flow from the same root in the original language! so Delicacy is not just an arbitrary adjective 'we humans' use whenever we want. we can... but it is a noun and a verb and has a meaning. The way dirt had a meaning before it was used to fashion Adam's body.. so the play was inspired to be written to elucidate the meaning and applicability of a word : delicacy. " Straight Men " preachers, etc...have all used woman and the rib to establish patriarchal rule...and the fact that woman is a 'side piece' as it comes to the importance of man. Its been used abusively.. To have the idea of delicacy rehearsed by a man who has decided to abandon " manhood' and all its ******** in order to be closer to the definition of love was the point of homosexuality even being identified. As your response to me even proves, " who the **** wants to listen to man explain anything to anyone about how anything should be?
you really do go too far...aside from all that...will you lean into another Play I have written and give me your opinion..? and don't tell me all this is going to represent is someone with whom you will be forever annoyed with..
1. Your name implies peaceful guidance yet you insult Destee members as if we are children cowering before you in fright and awe by soothing our collective fear of your presence by crooning to us mindless ones not to be afraid. Of what? You? Expressing our opinion(s) in a collective or singular sense to you?

2. If your hawking your books on Destee I believe you need to either read Destee TOS or contact Miss Destee herself to seek approval.

3. Homosexuality is not considered to be abhorrent and deviant behavior worthy of ridicule and at times death here in America like it is in Middle East.

4. You would have lent more credibility to yourself, your cause and more so your sales pitch if you would have presented yourself in a legitimate manner by posting links or outright spelling out what this exhaustive PDF file revealed at the end of whatever you claim it really is.

5. Delicacy describes what one does in a manner conducive to effect an aura in a calming sense. No one race, creed, religion, culture or sex has the right to claim a definition. It is not copyrighted, patented or otherwise owned by anyone person or group.

6. If your religion espouses your most high leader being Hebrew or Arab and is intolerant of homosexuality and those freely practicing such it is now a universally accepted alternate lifestyle as long as it bears no malice to others not accepting it.

7. You'd have a better chance of selling whatever it is your selling by applying to Amazon for permission to have them sell whatever it is your selling, your catalog notwithstanding.

I hope this helps you in some small manner. Good day.
 
In no way am I defending homosexuality, it is an abomination before God ...
this is my point Mr. Clyde..you said nothing gets passed you concerning the Bible..I am suggesting MUCH has gotten passed us all due to our learning it in English...Delicacy does belong solely to women only in the way that an erection belongs solely to man. of course the clitoris is engorged....but who owns the word erection? what biological operation owns that word? of course it can applied anywhere in any vernacular.. but if you were pressed to assign just one word to masculinity it would have to be something akin to aggression or strength...likewise if you had to assign a word to femininity it would have to be delicacy..and that delicacy is not just an adjective. Its semantic properties, in its original language and initial useage in the human language/speech index is astounding..to me. The Most High has been and is more involved with the mechanics of speech and our useage of it, than we have been taught. Prayer, notwithstanding. You will pass on my solicitations...? If you mean my asking for your expertise in writing, I will solicit you no more. If it was inappropriate to ask, which I now think it was, I do apologize.
To you be peace.

"If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination.
They shall surely be put to death.
Their blood shall be upon them."
(Leviticus 20:13)

You may not be a professional writer Taahir, but I am ... Click here.


Lets be clear, are these your words below?


"The theme is that homosexuals try to emulate delicacy and it belongs SOLELY to women."

Then the title change I suggested fits, and would prevent any misunderstanding.

As far as the solicitations you've made of me, I'll pass. There isn't much in the Bible or Qur'an that gets pass me.

...
 
If you mean my asking for your expertise in writing, I will solicit you no more. If it was inappropriate to ask, which I now think it was, I do apologize.
this is my point Mr. Clyde..you said nothing gets passed you concerning the Bible..I am suggesting MUCH has gotten passed us all due to our learning it in English...Delicacy does belong solely to women only in the way that an erection belongs solely to man. of course the clitoris is engorged....but who owns the word erection? what biological operation owns that word? of course it can applied anywhere in any vernacular.. but if you were pressed to assign just one word to masculinity it would have to be something akin to aggression or strength...likewise if you had to assign a word to femininity it would have to be delicacy..and that delicacy is not just an adjective. Its semantic properties, in its original language and initial useage in the human language/speech index is astounding..to me. The Most High has been and is more involved with the mechanics of speech and our useage of it, than we have been taught. Prayer, notwithstanding. You will pass on my solicitations...?
To you be peace.


First, learn how to quote posts. The way you are doing it is all wrong and quite painstaking for the recipient, like myself.

Again, your thoughts are duly noted as I said initially.

It was inappropriate for you to categorize someone as a professional reader ...

"I am not a professional writer but perhaps you are a professional reader."

Paradigm issues are not problematic as you opine. If that were so, then God or the Most High would not have the power to even write the good book.

Your apology is accepted, lets leave this at that.

...

 

Donate

Support destee.com, the oldest, most respectful, online black community in the world - PayPal or CashApp

Latest profile posts

HODEE wrote on Etophil's profile.
Welcome to Destee
@Etophil
Destee wrote on SleezyBigSlim's profile.
Hi @SleezyBigSlim ... Welcome Welcome Welcome ... :flowers: ... please make yourself at home ... :swings:
Back
Top