Isn't it already? Go into any Black neighborhood school and see if it's not already segregated. White schools too.... Has it been beneficial?
Do you think this bit of logic is applied across the board? Well let me tell you,it's not. If guidelines such as this were followed, the predominately black schools would be on par with the predominately white schools out where I live. I've designed schools for both,and I see how black schools get the bare minimum, while white schools get things that are overkill. White schools get this without anybody marching, or protesting. But they do protest when their kids are slated to be bussed to predominately black schools. When this happens, you know they give the school district an address that allows their child to go to the white school, and the district and state knows it. But with us,we settle for to get the benefit of the cheese,we have to accept the trap. And that is where they know they have us. This brutha sees the real problem, and he says what the problem is. That school is meant for the black students who needs it. Whites always complain that we need to help ourselves,and when we do,they want to throw rules at us. Rule that they themselves don't follow. Peace!
Where you live is not a fair representation of everywhere. Out here,you only have all white schools when you get out into the boonies.
I uphold what I stated. If you desire to do things as you like free from government interference, don't accept the "free cheese" (funding). The logic applies even for those who are unaware of it. When you reach for the dollars, there are strings attached. There is always free cheese in a mouse trap. There is "free cheese" across the board from banking, education, etc. Actually for many schools that are predominantly African-American, more money is spent per student than at other schools. The aforementioned is speculative until you verify it for yourself by investigating the books of the school and district. The students may not receive the funding, but someone is getting it. Assuming these schools that are predominantly AA are underfunded, they are still under control of someone else. Home schooling is still an option. More AAs are doing this more than ever. What about the many AA churches? Couldn't schooling be done by the churches like say ... Catholic schools ? That school is still funded by tax payer dollars and subject to control by the Department of Education, the State, and the Board of Education. To put this in more dignified terms, "He who accepts the benefit suffers its burden". That's a maxim of law right there. If one desires freedom (and control), one must forgo benefits proffered by others. The benefits are the means of subjugation. Subjugation means a loss of agency. Let's face facts here, we exist in a system not designed for our benefit or well-being, but there is still enough breathing room for us to create those systems for our benefit. In the past when Europeans did not wish to worship in the same house as AAs, AAs formed their own churches. Why can't this formula be repeated with schools? Something else to consider is that rights are created and maintained by "sustained combat". There is more than enough examples in history to support the aforementioned. To appeal to the conscious of your adversary (or belligerent) is not something I would hold my hat on. Don't expect the adversary to let your AA children go so easily either with a per capita benefit of anywhere from $5,000 - $10,000 per student depending on the district.