In the Spirit of Sankofa and Truth! cherryblossom, There is nothing wrong with you using the scripture with me in this discussion, although you say "debate." The problem continues to be the manner in which you took pleasure in doing so, it seems. Repeatedly, I have said it was frivolously done, and will continue to think and say that. There is no assurance you can give that it wasn't done in that manner, when you are dead-set on dodging the initial questions, which were offered for introspection only. For example, here are your words: let's say that I did know You KNEW what it meant AND that YOU are aware that it applies to you as well...Let's say, you say, Let's say, wow, how frivolous is that sister? Besides, do you not recall, I needed no direct answers? How long will this back and forth ranting continue? What is the point? And no, I'm not the one taking it personal, you are the one sister cherryblossom. Actually, you severely misunderstood my statement of there being only one interpretation of scripture. The Word of God is not ambiguous, it has only one meaning from its author, not several different opposing points of view. It is up to us to find that one meaning, through the methodology I laid out, about which methodology you had no comment. So, do you disagree with the methodology I cited earlier? It wouldn't surprize me at all if you disagree!