Discussion in 'Black Spirituality / Religion - General Discussion' started by ru2religious, May 14, 2012.
I may have misunderstood -- yet know this -- I cannot have an intelligent conversation with you or anyone else about bible babble which is a blatant retelling of the destruction of black civilization.
I wasn't speaking to you - I was actually talking to CD - I also hope you do understand that I actually agree with everything that you've written up to this point whether in this post or other ones - so just to clear things up - I wasn't addressing you - I was actually addressing CD.
Actually according to the bible they set up shop in the land of Shinar aka Sumeria and these people which came from the East actually came from south east (southern India = Dravidians/Kolerians/Sudras) based on your bible ... They did not set up shop in Egypt according to the bible. The invader of ancient Km.t usually came from the north which is to say - Greece, Rome, and from the south their brothers Ta Seti and Nahesu and the east (extreme next door) the Hyksos aka possible a sect of Canaanites came through but keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians owned the Canaanite territory which is why people are having a hard time figuring out why and how the Hyksos just popped up in Egyptian history. They were part of the history and as far as the creator god intervening - such is simply a fable for kids.
The question of the thread deals with the switch of the Satan and Yahweh - do you have anything to add which will prove that the religious text you subscribe to didn't make a switch?
Well, I will acknowledge your insult in regards to those who believe in the Creator as being 'a fable for kids' and want to add that this is the jist of your thread, and I addressed your quote in regards to the Bible about 'the Creator' and in regards to 'they came from the east'.
Again, I address the 'switch' you propose in regrads to the scripture you cited 'they came from the east' and 'set up in the land of Shinar' which is 'Kemet lands' [Black lands], and said that all history shows that White Supremacy set up in Black lands, and the Bible states that 'the Creator' struck down they tower project [that you cited], showing that 'the Creator' is against White Supremacy and ane in favor of Kemet even though it was the Kemet kings that let in these easterners, hence your 'switch' idea becomes a total contradiction. And I further reiterated that your switch idea is a contradiction based on the Roman Empire history too. Since you cited that scripture, I responded to that issue, of 'the Creator' making an intervention, which is just what the scripture explained. That scripture agrees with history. But for you to cite that scripture and then call it 'a fable for kids' just doesn't make any since in regards to your proposing an challenge. I addressed this on its merit and what you wrote.
No doubt about it!
I see where you have tried to go with this but I need to make a few points here.
Kemet and what some refer as Ethiopia or Ethiopians as you know was actually Nubia which consisted if two kingdoms: Kush and Wawat. From this evolved Kerma.
Ta Senet was centered in what also is known as Esna or Latopolis. This is north of Nubia do the two people who were quite distinct should not be confused as one.
Separate names with a comma.