Africa : Out of Africa theory in Question?

In the Spirit of Sankofa


... I don't buy this Out of Australia theory, being pushed by Steven Strong, on which basis the goal is to switch the Original Aborigine's lower place(young) on the human ladder to the very top of the ladder(oldest), over Africans.

Clearly and understandably, its a play on words when you consider this indisputable language:


The first genome analysis of an Aborigine reveals that these early Australians took part in the first human migration out of Africa. They were the first to arrive in Asia some 70,000 years ago, roaming the area at least 24,000 years before the ancestors of present-day Europeans and Asians. They were also the first to live in Australia, according to DNA results of a 90-year-old hair sample of a young man that link Aborigines to the first inhabitants of this part of the world about 50,000 years ago.


main%20rasmussen2HR-thumb-615x300-63933.jpg

Aborigines: The First Out of Africa, the First in Asia and Australia

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...frica-the-first-in-asia-and-australia/245392/


Reading through the material, they try and make the case that travels occurred from Australia to Africa, and not the other way around.

Let's not get off-stride, the Aborigine and African are definitely in the same group, regardless ...



36451536.Aboriginalmanforweb.jpg

Aboriginal man at Quay


2011_Libya_AfricanMigrants.jpg


Africans workers of unknown origin at the port of Benghazi. Boat crews prohibited them from boarding because they were only authorized to evacuate certain


Steven-Strong-150x150.jpg


Steven Strong is an Australian-based researcher, author and former high school teacher with a background in archaeology. He was involved in the formation of a Graduate Diploma of Aboriginal Education for the NSW Department of Education, writing units on Traditional Law and Contemporary History. He also co-authored the highly successful “Aboriginal Australia: A Language and Cultural kit”.

Source: same link in OP ...



What do you think about this --> http://wakeup-world.com/2013/12/16/...of-human-evolution/?replytocom=276938#respond

And what do you think about these people? according to them AA ain't Africans.

 
In the Spirit of Sankofa


... I don't buy this Out of Australia theory, being pushed by Steven Strong, on which basis the goal is to switch the Original Aborigine's lower place(young) on the human ladder to the very top of the ladder(oldest), over Africans.

Clearly and understandably, its a play on words when you consider this indisputable language:


The first genome analysis of an Aborigine reveals that these early Australians took part in the first human migration out of Africa. They were the first to arrive in Asia some 70,000 years ago, roaming the area at least 24,000 years before the ancestors of present-day Europeans and Asians. They were also the first to live in Australia, according to DNA results of a 90-year-old hair sample of a young man that link Aborigines to the first inhabitants of this part of the world about 50,000 years ago.


main%20rasmussen2HR-thumb-615x300-63933.jpg

Aborigines: The First Out of Africa, the First in Asia and Australia

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...frica-the-first-in-asia-and-australia/245392/


Reading through the material, they try and make the case that travels occurred from Australia to Africa, and not the other way around.

Let's not get off-stride, the Aborigine and African are definitely in the same group, regardless ...



36451536.Aboriginalmanforweb.jpg

Aboriginal man at Quay


2011_Libya_AfricanMigrants.jpg


Africans workers of unknown origin at the port of Benghazi. Boat crews prohibited them from boarding because they were only authorized to evacuate certain

Well I got that they were saying that Africans and Australians split off, and Australians contributed greatly to the non african peoples genes. Which is true. Australians have introduced genes to Indians and as far as China. It was stated that the first Americans were Australoid Melnoid type people. Its a very interesting find. One thing I can say is that Australians have some features that are very different from African groups, it was stated that Australians mixed in with the Denisovans which is why they have the features they have.

None the less Africans seem to represent the pure stock of Homo Sapiens having No Neanderthal or Denisovan in their gene pool.
 
...


Going that far back, its all about presumptions, inferences, theories, etc... Not to mention its science that's deeply connected to macro evolution. Personally, I don't buy into the theory of macro evolution either; but what I do know is that Aborigines and so-called Africans are in the same group, from the same continent, originating in Africa/Alkebu-lan ...




Well I got that they were saying that Africans and Australians split off, and Australians contributed greatly to the non african peoples genes. Which is true. Australians have introduced genes to Indians and as far as China. It was stated that the first Americans were Australoid Melnoid type people. Its a very interesting find. One thing I can say is that Australians have some features that are very different from African groups, it was stated that Australians mixed in with the Denisovans which is why they have the features they have.

None the less Africans seem to represent the pure stock of Homo Sapiens having No Neanderthal or Denisovan in their gene pool.
 

Donate

Support destee.com, the oldest, most respectful, online black community in the world - PayPal or CashApp

Latest profile posts

HODEE wrote on Etophil's profile.
Welcome to Destee
@Etophil
Destee wrote on SleezyBigSlim's profile.
Hi @SleezyBigSlim ... Welcome Welcome Welcome ... :flowers: ... please make yourself at home ... :swings:
Back
Top