In the Spirit of Sankofa, ... No, I'm not saying black people are genetically superior, I'm saying black people are normal and have dominant genes. How could you possibly not know what I'm talking about? Clearly, superior is a term of global white racism supremacy, and I caution your use of it; whereas dominant is a term explaining human characteristics. Below, please find other contrasts by clicking the link source: DOMINANT AND RECESSIVE CHARACTERISTICSCharacteristics in the left-hand column dominate over those characteristics listed in the right-hand column. other immunity to poison ivynormal pigmented skinnormal blood clottingnormal hearingnormal hearing and speakingnormal- no PKUsusceptibility to poison ivyalbinismhemophilia*congenital deafnessdeaf mutismphenylketonuria (PKU) http://www.blinn.edu/socialscience/ldthomas/feldman/handouts/0203hand.htm Peace In,
That is what he means. But you will never get him to admit it. Several people here use words like mutant, devolved, and recessive when referring to whites. And, they use words like dominant when referring to blacks. These are code words designed to allow racist black people to pretend they cannot be racist.
In the Spirit of Sankofa, ... Such a huge aberration in your view istlota, sadly prevents truth from entering your Matrix Movie mindset(MMM): Clearly, to have normal pigmentation or dominant genes is considered normal, while albinism, recessive alleles, is considered abnormal. Furthermore, my position clearly explains that its European or racist to use the term superior. While its scientific, genetics, biological and truth to use the term dominant, when referring to the general make-up of humans. One last point here, its white folk that refer to themselves in the scientific manner of recessive gene traits, not black folk; I'm simply providing the information, brother. Peace In,