Redundancy only begins to describe the problems with this concept. It's incredibly incomplete and inaccurate. The equal symbol defeats the purpose of the revelation. Light equals self and self equals light? What is this to mean? Are you trying to communicate that the self travels in wave packets at a fixed, yet fastest, rate of speed? Are you trying to communicate that the self diffracts when going through narrow pathways? Are you trying to say that the self has a particle and wave nature? Are you trying to claim that the self can contribute positively to photosynthesis? What is this wording to mean? Some times people say things to sound deep, but the depths of what they say are shallow. To claim self equal to light is bizarre and outright an abuse of brain cells. To further draw equivalences as you do is plain ugly. Why don't you reason what 'light' is then tell us how you perceive that the self is not at all different from 'light?' When you are done mulling over this impossible task, please resist the urge to again claim up this dry, dry nonsense. You doubt your whole heritage and absorb yourself in a Philosophy which gives you nothing and only misleads you. The world is rife with injustices, yet you play with your intelligence by mulling over a light nature while engorging yourself in activities 'un-light' like.