Having been here since it's birth. You are the one that lacks understanding rookie. I have posted the evidence for my arguments over and over. Johnnie come latelys gotta look it up. *smh @ the neophytes tryin to run da sho*
Yet, you've posted nothing besides opinions yet claim facts.
How about you take your own suggestion to me to hop on Google and quit being lazy?
Kemetstry said:
That's exactly what you did! And btw, I cant address a statement(s) so vaccuous it has no substance. Men have traditionally been the moral head of the family. We arent about to change the traditional roles. Each male and female must stay in theor own lane.
Yet, many men are now absent from many families.
Many men can't even be the moral head of themselves, so how are they going to be the moral head of someone else?
Kemetstry said:
You arent staying in yours, thus the chaos. Moreover, many of you are trying to take on both roles, which you have no qualifications for. Perhaps if more of you would actually date and mate with men, this situation in our community wouldnt happen
A person has to do what a person has to do. Can't wait on someone else to do what they ought to do.
Kemetstry said:
This again shows you are a novice. I named, characterized and defined Mookie over ten year ago on this very site. In fact, it took national promenance as the official view of a dawg. I have yet however, seen one female do the same foe a skank. So no one would ever think to accuse me of defending Mookie. On the contrary, it was the famales that attacked me 1st for talking about him. But back to your socalled point. So many of you insist on mating with guys like Mookie, which is why STDs, abnd broken families are happening. Mookie isnt a man. Yet you date and mate with him anyway. Men feel NO compulsion to take responsibility for any female's insistance for dating him. That is a self inflicted injury. When those of you quit idolizing this loser, much of your problems will stop.
..
Just because you state it, doesn't make it so.
If I were to do a bit of psychological assessment of what you just stated, it would seem to me you have some animus against females. For you to come out so fervently against my opinion that men are a cause is worthy of more analysis. If I recall, there have been other threads of yours that would lend credence to this assessment. I'll have to go back through this message board to fish them out.
Here is one of your more famous threads titled, "
She won't put out".
In another thread titled, "
Powerful Women Cheat?", you claim that the first adulterer was a woman without any cite or proof of claim.
Here is another gem from you titled
Do Women Give Bad Advice?
I'm beginning to distinguish a pattern here with respect to your posts concerning women.
By the by, a fun fact for you:
The word 'family' comes from the Latin word 'famulus' meaning 'servant'. The word family originally meant a grouping of slaves or servants who had the same master. It wasn't until recently that the word family meant a husband, wife, and kids.