In the Spirit of Sankofa, ...... Okay, so you learned something today, good. What does this have to do with what we are talking about, you ask... If I can get you to now answer my question, are you speaking from a micro or macro perspective when you use the term: evolution; we shall see. Microevolution vs MacroevolutionIs There A Difference Between Microevolution & Macroevolution? Microevolution is used to refer to changes in the gene pool of a population over time which result in relatively small changes to the organisms in the population — changes which would not result in the newer organisms being considered as different species. Examples of such microevolutionary changes would include a change in a species’ coloring or size. Macroevolution, in contrast, is used to refer to changes in organisms which are significant enough that, over time, the newer organisms would be considered an entirely new species. In other words, the new organisms would be unable to mate with their ancestors, assuming we were able to bring them together. Same link used by istlota... Peace In,
In the Spirit of Sankofa, ....... Come out of your state of confusion and Show and Prove elder that whites are not human. Otherwise, its just cannon fodder you're blowing. Peace In,
i do not have to show anything. a fact is a fact whether or not i will prove it. the sun will come up tomorrow. i am not even going to try to prove that it will. whites show no humane behavior. they are not human.
Clearly, except for racists, blacks and whites are not different species. And, Obama is living proof that blacks and white can mate and produce offspring. Hence, by the definition provided, I would be speaking micro evolution.
In the Spirit of Sankofa, ....... Don't mix apples with oranges, lol... your position on this matter is pure cannon fodder. Peace In,