Let me see if I can play that back in a slightly different way. Come now and let us reason together.
Africans were the first homo-whatevers. They were not created by the God which religions talk about but, rather, they were created as a result of a seed colony started on planet Earth by extraterrestrials --- specifically the Annunaki. The Annunaki created Africans --- black homo-whatevers --- to function as slaves to dig up gold for the Annunaki.
The fact that the oldest digs by anthropologists invariably end up being in what we now call Africa suggests that, in the genetic Tree Of Life which represents the evolution of homo-whatevers, Africans show up first and Whites branch off later from that. Hence, the idea that we created them. Not that blacks created whites from NoThing, but that whites evolved genetically from blacks.
Am I correct so far?
I would like to ask for the forgiveness of that first post which was riddle with grammatical errors - I pulled an all niter working on a project and was writing and falling a sleep. Please note I'm writing about a mythology which a lot of mythology have high levels of truth behind it.
Okay what you call the evolution of man I call the devolution of man by way of barbaric actions and savagery. We have to get the language right before we can move further. There is a difference between the words ' mutation' and 'evolution' and what brought on the existence of white people had nothing to do with evolution. They came about through the act of interbreeding which in turn created a mutant gene. I know it sound harsh but reality the of their existence is harsher. Interbreeding is something that you do voluntarily whether through the parcels of lust or though a contractual union which was used as a preventative for war; either way this decision is what created white folks whom should more reasonably be called 'carcinogen[ians]' because they have been a cancer to this planet and all the inhabitants of it.
Now what I was writing was based on the Annunaki and their writings which could be responsible for the creation or genetic production of
some Africans. Their story is a story surrounded by gold yet there is a much richer history/mythology to the Annunaki. The funny thing is - one of oldest civilization found or known to man is approximately 160 - 200,000 years old and it was found in southern Africa - 150 miles inland of Maputo. The area is one of the highest concentration of gold in all of Africa from what they've found to date. Here are the words from the man who found this place - Michael Tellinger:
"The thousands of ancient gold mines discovered over the past 500 years, points to a vanished civilization that lived and dug for gold in this part of the world for thousands of years,"
"And if this is in fact the cradle of humankind, we may be looking at the activities of the oldest civilization on Earth."
Now I'm not one who gives much credentials to Zacharia Sitchen (
actually I really don't give him credentials) but there is something about his story that collaborates with the finding of Michael Tellinger and this South Africa finding. I used the bible earlier because many of the stories found in the OT have come from ancient Sumeria/Mesopotamia - which is the supposed home of the Annunaki. One of the stories suggest that Adam was created in a different place and placed in the 'Garden of Eden' which is actually found in South Africa or ancient Ethiopia aka Sudan. That's a different topic for a different day. Nevertheless, you can reference this in Genesis 2:15 and please note the word 'took' is the Hebrew word 'Laqach' which also means 'fetch, bring, carry away, drawn' which serves as a form of migration to this garden.
The bible makes reference to these gods aka (Elohym) creating man to mine or till and that was there sole purpose. Most people don't read the bible properly and thus they get all of these loose translation yet the scriptures let you know that man was created to dig or in better terms mine.
Genesis 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth,
and there was not a man to *TILL* the ground.
Please look at the word 'till' in its Hebrew form:
H5647
עבד
‛âbad
aw-bad'
A primitive root; to work (in any sense); by implication to serve, till, (causatively) enslave, etc.: - X be, keep in bondage, be bondmen, bond-service, compel, do, dress, ear, execute, + husbandman, keep, labour (-ing man), bring to pass, (cause to, make to) serve (-ing, self), (be, become) servant (-s), do (use) service, till (-er), transgress [from margin], (set a) work, be wrought, worshipper.
It sounds very similar to the story Zacharia Sitchen gave in his translation of the Sumerian text. To till the ground is to mine the ground and the bible was extremely conscious on this point. It was also conscious on the point of man being created as slaves. Its in there - is just people don't do the research necessary to find it. Going back to the word Elohym, I think this would be a good of a place as any to define the meaning of the word. In Genesis chapters 1 -2 the word God is used and most Christians consider it as a singular noun but the word God is literally 'Elohim/Elohym' which is a plural - and it means:
H430
אלהים
'ĕlôhı̂ym
el-o-heem'
Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: - angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.
The book of Genesis describes the Gods/Elohym which created man to 'mine' the earth. The word 'Annunaki' literally means '
Those who from Heaven to Earth came' these are the same as the Elohym; different language. Most of us at one point believed that the biblical god created man having come from Christian background or even Muslim. The question should be, what's the different from the Annunaki story especially if the origins of the biblical story actually came from the Sumerian documents and is saying the same exact thing? If Africans were created in God image then man were created in the image of the black Annunaki which we define as ALIENS today. Elohym/Annunaki created man for one purpose and that was to till the ground aka mine for gold, hence the name 'Nubian' i.e. Gold Miners. The Nubian were from the South in Africa and that's what they primarily did. Its funny how we African Americans call ourselves Nubian - it kind of makes one wonder.
In that video posted above - whoever was using that robotic voice spoke of these Gods coming back to save humanity. If this is true then how is it possible when Enlil wanted humans to be slaves and work to feed the gods and mine? In the end he wanted humans dead because they began to complain to the gods. It was his brother Enki (who is the serpent...lol) that saved man from the destruction of Enlil. If they are coming back then they are coming back to destroy man and not save them.
These Aliens once known as Gods if they do come back - the biblical mythology has it that they will have a battle with the beast ... 666. The number 666 is actually 6 electrons, 6 nuetrons and 6 protons which is Carbon 12 base. Carbon 12 base is one of the main 5 components that make up man. You don't need to me tell you this - the bible says it for you.
Revelation 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of
the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. (666)
Do people get it? Human's are literally in the process of transformation on a scientific level from the 12 base into something much different. These Aliens gods or whatever you want to call them - if they are on their way back and that's a big if!!! - its possible that they want to destroy man so that they wont make the transition. In the bible it tells you that they kicked man out of the garden so that they wouldn't bite into the tree of life - which clearly suggest that they don't want man to live forever. The people who claim to have heard haven't heard anything.
Peace
Ru2religious