I think I coined a new term. 'Gift sex' is the act of performing sexual favors for some one else exclusively for their benefit, even when there is no sexual/erotic benefit for yourself (ie. if you aren't in the mood or the person is unattractive to you), just for the sake of being kind. It can be given to strangers, friends, romantic partners etc.



Would you ever give gift sex to a woman (if you knew she was std-free)? What do you think of the concept?

Yea I use 2 offer them that all the time back in the dayzzz but after getting smacked up a few times. I just decided to buy them a card instead.

Apparently there were some mis-communication in my nice advances.

What happened to arousal? I cain't do it with a limp biskit, but then if I got it up to giveit that would mean there was some benefit for me. Honestly, if I wasn't married, I would sympathize even more with the Young Money, "..... Every Girl in the World." I love Black women immensely.

Tuhwi

What happened to arousal? I cain't do it with a limp biskit, but then if I got it up to giveit that would mean there was some benefit for me. Honestly, if I wasn't married, I would sympathize even more with the Young Money, "..... Every Girl in the World." I love Black women immensely.

Tuhwi

Pesonally, I was thinking more along the lines of cunnilingus or fingering her or something like that, I couldn't get hard to a woman I wasn't attracted to either.

brother african prince. i need to know if you are into pedophilia.
i am going by the statements you made in the other thread.
i just like to know what i am dealing with.



http://destee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59932

Pesonally, I was thinking more along the lines of cunnilingus or fingering her or something like that, I couldn't get hard to a woman I wasn't attracted to either.

With respect to Destee, its members including the young ones who frequent these threads

I do feel that such illustration that you posted here, should have a sex rated, pehaps x rated
for adult eyes, adult content only attachment..

I do not mean to sound like a prude, and know that I'm still new here, yet it may be something we need to consider, since we are all in this together, how we post such material.....:10500:

sex for sex sake is animalistic unless u really know the person and have some sort of understanding....

trial and error taught me this life lesson.....

i see u like coming from left field brother....s'all good i guess
*shruggin shoulderz*

one love
khasm

sex for sex sake is animalistic

:10500:makes me wonder just what it is that we have among us......

brother african prince. i need to know if you are into pedophilia.
i am going by the statements you made in the other thread.
i just like to know what i am dealing with.



http://destee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59932

Why do you 'need' to know? Why would you assume thatI'm a pedophile for advocating the idea that pedophiles should not be discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation anymore than you would assume I am a homosexual for advocating gay marriage? Why is there sucha 'witch hunt' mentality when it comes to pedophiles?

sex for sex sake is animalistic

Good thing I'm an animal.

Good thing I'm an animal.

u said it brother....i didn't....:whip:

tiss the same thing that a lot of white folks think about us too...fyi

hence the term jungle bunny.....

one love
khasm

Why do you 'need' to know?

i need to know so i can decide what i am dealing with and how i look at you in the future



Why would you assume thatI'm a pedophile for advocating the idea that pedophiles should not be discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation anymore than you would assume I am a homosexual for advocating gay marriage?
even though your statements fit within the description that the mental health professionals did give, i did not assume anything. i asked.

i ask again. are you a pedophile?



Why is there sucha 'witch hunt' mentality when it comes to pedophiles?
do you have children? that you ask this question is one of the reasons that i wonder if you share the same reality that i do.

Pesonally, I was thinking more along the lines of cunnilingus or fingering her or something like that, I couldn't get hard to a woman I wasn't attracted to either.

With respect to Destee, its members including the young ones who frequent these threads

I do feel that such illustration that you posted here, should have a sex rated, pehaps x rated
for adult eyes, adult content only attachment..

I do not mean to sound like a prude, and know that I'm still new here, yet it may be something we need to consider, since we are all in this together, how we post such material.....:10500:

Brother African Prince ... i agree with Brother Josef ... maintain the high road, please.

:heart:

Destee

u said it brother....i didn't....:whip:

tiss the same thing that a lot of white folks think about us too...fyi

hence the term jungle bunny.....

one love
khasm
Maybe I'm reading too much into it but, Khasm, I think you missed his point.

According to Biology, ALL humans are classified as animals.

According to Biology, ALL humans are classified as animals.
:em0200:all except those of us on the higher spiritual plane who levitate six inches above the ground....

Maybe I'm reading too much into it but, Khasm, I think you missed his point.

According to Biology, ALL humans are classified as animals.

i think the term u were looking for brother is mammal....

one love
khasm

brother knowledge i stand corrected in the realm of 2d(purely science)...
but if we look at a 3d space(science + metaphysics) i suggest that we are more than the plane jane definition of animals....

here is the most precise answer i found on the web...cause i don't have time to type it all up myself...good point though

1) Technical answer:
---------------------

This is not an issue of religion or science, but an issue in

taxonomy of taxonomy.


Taxonomy is a discipline teaching about classifications:
How we form categories and subcategories.

On this level, your question is of the same type as this one:

Is a square a rectangle?

Some people define categories exclusively, so that a rectangle is a
quadrilateral with four right angles that is not a square. This is
appropriate for everyday use of the words, as people typically use the
less specific word only when the more specific word will not do.

But in mathematics, it is important to define categories inclusively,
so that a square is a rectangle. Inclusive categories make statements
of theorems shorter, by eliminating the need for tedious listing of
cases. For example, the visual proof that vector addition is
commutative is known as the "parallelogram diagram". If categories
were exclusive it would have to be known as the "parallelogram (or
rectangle or rhombus or square) diagram"!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrilateral



Categories form a tree (a technical term) which,
in common language we call 'hierarchy'.

Examples of hierarchies:

Theological: God, saved souls, angels, man, birds, animals, plants, rocks
(See also Hierarchy of angels)
Scientific classification of organisms: kingdom, phylum, class,
order, family, genus, species
Social: monarch, nobles, gentry, yeomanry, peasants, serfs...
In geometry: shape, polygon, quadrilateral, rectangle, square
In biology: animal, bird, raptor, eagle, golden eagle

How do we classify hierarchies?

A containment hierarchy is a collection of strictly nested sets. Each
entry in the hierarchy designates a set such that the previous entry
is a strict superset, and the next entry is a strict subset. For
example, all rectangles are quadrilaterals, but not all quadrilaterals
are rectangles, and all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles
are squares. (See also: Taxonomy.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy


So, in conclusion:

It is a matter of convention to use a containment or partition hierarchy.
In containment hierarchy squares are rectangles and humans are animals.

This is suitable in areas where mathematical reasoning is useful, as
in science and computer programming.
(see search term OO Obect oriented programming, e.g.
http://members.aol.com/jbjtutor/css/pagec_27.html )

In common life, including religion, it is convenient to use partition hierarchy:
If you are using just two kinds of polygons for something : let's say
rectangular quadrilateral parallelograms, some regular and some not, you would
want to partition that class into two exclusive subcategories:
rectangles and squares.
That way you can ask an assistant: "hand me a square", or "hand me a
rectangle", which is shorter then 'hand me a regular rectagle'.
It is more efficient.


2) Philosophical answer:

However, you may mot be happy with just the technical analysis given above.
It is too dry and it skirts an interesting and fundamental question:

What are we, when where do we come from, ...

or more timely version: What are we doing (in ..) .. Are we animals?

Relevant research is nicely summarized in this book:

The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal (1992)
ISBN 0060984031
http://www.enotalone.com/books/0060984031.html
by professor Diamond
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Diamond

read the rest here....http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=540280one love
khasm

I think I coined a new term. 'Gift sex' is the act of performing sexual favors for some one else exclusively for their benefit, even when there is no sexual/erotic benefit for yourself (ie. if you aren't in the mood or the person is unattractive to you), just for the sake of being kind. It can be given to strangers, friends, romantic partners etc.



Would you ever give gift sex to a woman (if you knew she was std-free)? What do you think of the concept?

Brother African Prince ... i become somewhat orgasmic when a Sister or Brother becomes a Premium Member.

So, well ... i'm jes say'n ... if you're still feel'n philanthropic ... :love:

Love You!

:heart:

Destee

I think I coined a new term. 'Gift sex' is the act of performing sexual favors for some one else exclusively for their benefit, even when there is no sexual/erotic benefit for yourself (ie. if you aren't in the mood or the person is unattractive to you), just for the sake of being kind. It can be given to strangers, friends, romantic partners etc.



Would you ever give gift sex to a woman (if you knew she was std-free)? What do you think of the concept?


I do NOT receive or give obligatory sex!

obligatory sex!

obligatory sex? hmmmmm....sounds kinky to me

Peace,

I'm fresh out of charity..........

Them days is over.

:peace:

I think I coined a new term. 'Gift sex' is the act of performing sexual favors for some one else exclusively for their benefit, even when there is no sexual/erotic benefit for yourself (ie. if you aren't in the mood or the person is unattractive to you), just for the sake of being kind. It can be given to strangers, friends, romantic partners etc.



Would you ever give gift sex to a woman (if you knew she was std-free)? What do you think of the concept?
never could understand that, first of all I am concieted and only am attracted to the finest of women,
and never flirt unless I see somequeen that drives me crazy!

Pesonally, I was thinking more along the lines of cunnilingus or fingering her or something like that, I couldn't get hard to a woman I wasn't attracted to either.


So, lemme see if I understand this correctly... you couldn't possibly have sex by penile penetration if you're not attracted to a woman but you could be so intimate as to put your mouth on her and perform oral sex?


wow.

So, lemme see if I understand this correctly... you couldn't possibly have sex by penile penetration if you're not attracted to a woman but you could be so intimate as to put your mouth on her and perform oral sex?


wow.

:10500: consider the source....

Brother African Prince ... i become somewhat orgasmic when a Sister or Brother becomes a Premium Member.

So, well ... i'm jes say'n ... if you're still feel'n philanthropic ... :love:

Love You!

:heart:

Destee
Another reason for me to rob a bank