Isaiah
06-26-2004, 06:46 PM
I'm new to the site, and thought I would broach this subject for the purpose of clarification and discussion. I'm clear that the site has rules, and that if one wants to continue posting here, one must abide those rules, or leave.
As one who has been banned from a particular discussion forum for voicing a perspective that was not in concert with the proscribed perspective of the moderator of that site, and others, I am wondering what constitutes a really good reason for completely shutting off someone who may be voicing what is tantamount to a contrary position, but is their position, nonetheless??? Who, arbitrarily and capriciously, determines which opinions and perspectives are right, wrong, positive or negative???(smile!) In my case, I happened upon a so-called Soul Music discussion site, and determined from a reading of the current and archival posts, an absence of a sense of cultural copyright on the part of the African people posting there. On this European-owned site, I sensed that the brothers and sisters posting there were afraid to claim the music as an important part of our cultural contributions to the world, and it turned out I was absolutely right. I came under a withering degree of unconstructive criticism from most of the whites posting at this site, but found a great deal of support from brothers and sisters, who said, in effect, they'd been thinking the same thoughts, but had declined to voice them for the reasons that lay obvious before us all - White Supremacist backlash...
Well, I weathered the backlash by refusing to move an inch off of my position, and though I later gained a great deal of respect from even the hysterical white mob( some of whom praised me for bringing some real excitement to their insipidly boring discussions of rare soul), I had incurred the wrath of the website's moderators and owners, who actually changed the format of the site as a pretext for banning me from further posting(smile!)
Now, there was nothing I said at that site that was particularly revolutionary or incendiary... I simply stated the facts of history, and did the unthinkable act of proudly proclaiming our agency and ownership of African American cultural copyrights, save some contributions by "others..." My problem was one of etiquette, but as I was wholy supported by the facts, I saw no need to speak other than boldly and truthfully to that point...
My point is, though one may say things which others disagree with, this does not make them wrong, and the majority right. Because the majority becomes a hysterial mob when their views are challenged does not constitute a basis for the reactionary banning of a poster... In fact, I think the mob(moderator?)can do a disservice and an injustice to others who might benefit from engaging in serious debate with a poster who has an opposing viewpoint. It stimulates people to think, and teaches them to debate without personalizing the debate, and becoming hysterical. In effect, it challenges us to challenge our fears in a real way, and not by fiat. We cannot say that we have grown an iota if we drain the pool in which we have almost drowned. What we need to do is take some swimming lessons, and get back in that pool, and master it by swimming rings around it. You don't become a champion by running away from challenges, and taking your bat and ball, and going home. That's running away from the very thing that can enhance your power, ability, and confidence in self...
I think I am making the case for allowing folks to work things out, to police themselves, and grow in the process... I am always reminded of the transformation of Detroit Red into Minister Malcolm X - because somebody had the patience and the program to methodically change that man's life. As terrible a human being as he admitted to being, he later became "Our Shining Black Prince!" A Phoenix who rose from the ashes of his own ruins... I think there are many people who might be capable of slightly less dramatic transformations at this board if we will ourselves to work with those people, rather than being reactionary, and banning them... Thanks for you patience, and please, do not regard what I have said here as a personal attack on the Website Owners or Moderators(smile!) I have given, in detail, my reasons for writting this post, so please, take it as just my personal perspective...
Peace!
Isaiah
As one who has been banned from a particular discussion forum for voicing a perspective that was not in concert with the proscribed perspective of the moderator of that site, and others, I am wondering what constitutes a really good reason for completely shutting off someone who may be voicing what is tantamount to a contrary position, but is their position, nonetheless??? Who, arbitrarily and capriciously, determines which opinions and perspectives are right, wrong, positive or negative???(smile!) In my case, I happened upon a so-called Soul Music discussion site, and determined from a reading of the current and archival posts, an absence of a sense of cultural copyright on the part of the African people posting there. On this European-owned site, I sensed that the brothers and sisters posting there were afraid to claim the music as an important part of our cultural contributions to the world, and it turned out I was absolutely right. I came under a withering degree of unconstructive criticism from most of the whites posting at this site, but found a great deal of support from brothers and sisters, who said, in effect, they'd been thinking the same thoughts, but had declined to voice them for the reasons that lay obvious before us all - White Supremacist backlash...
Well, I weathered the backlash by refusing to move an inch off of my position, and though I later gained a great deal of respect from even the hysterical white mob( some of whom praised me for bringing some real excitement to their insipidly boring discussions of rare soul), I had incurred the wrath of the website's moderators and owners, who actually changed the format of the site as a pretext for banning me from further posting(smile!)
Now, there was nothing I said at that site that was particularly revolutionary or incendiary... I simply stated the facts of history, and did the unthinkable act of proudly proclaiming our agency and ownership of African American cultural copyrights, save some contributions by "others..." My problem was one of etiquette, but as I was wholy supported by the facts, I saw no need to speak other than boldly and truthfully to that point...
My point is, though one may say things which others disagree with, this does not make them wrong, and the majority right. Because the majority becomes a hysterial mob when their views are challenged does not constitute a basis for the reactionary banning of a poster... In fact, I think the mob(moderator?)can do a disservice and an injustice to others who might benefit from engaging in serious debate with a poster who has an opposing viewpoint. It stimulates people to think, and teaches them to debate without personalizing the debate, and becoming hysterical. In effect, it challenges us to challenge our fears in a real way, and not by fiat. We cannot say that we have grown an iota if we drain the pool in which we have almost drowned. What we need to do is take some swimming lessons, and get back in that pool, and master it by swimming rings around it. You don't become a champion by running away from challenges, and taking your bat and ball, and going home. That's running away from the very thing that can enhance your power, ability, and confidence in self...
I think I am making the case for allowing folks to work things out, to police themselves, and grow in the process... I am always reminded of the transformation of Detroit Red into Minister Malcolm X - because somebody had the patience and the program to methodically change that man's life. As terrible a human being as he admitted to being, he later became "Our Shining Black Prince!" A Phoenix who rose from the ashes of his own ruins... I think there are many people who might be capable of slightly less dramatic transformations at this board if we will ourselves to work with those people, rather than being reactionary, and banning them... Thanks for you patience, and please, do not regard what I have said here as a personal attack on the Website Owners or Moderators(smile!) I have given, in detail, my reasons for writting this post, so please, take it as just my personal perspective...
Peace!
Isaiah