Should USC be the National Champs? They did everything they were suppose to do. They only lost one game and seem to be the best team in the country. But computers say that they don't deserve it. LSU should be playin in the national championship game, but Oklahoma shouldn't be. They aren't even their conference champs. If Oklahoma wins, USC should be awarded the trophy. If LSU wins the national championship should be shared between LSU and USC. What do yall think?

USC is the nations top team i feel they should be CROWN the honors of CHAMPIONS had a near perfect season too LSU is good but USC was a standout to me and for Oklahoma really this team shouldn't be in the hunt at all to me they sit aside with
a team like FSU which i kinda like Florida state but USC was tops i must agree on this one

LSU wins with a #1 D in the nation .....21 - 14
and will they be name co-Champs with USC

Well, the computer considered strength of schedule. And LSU lost to a ranked Florida team (at the time) and Oklahoma LOST or got skunked by a ranked Kansas State team. USC LOST to an unranked California Bears team. If USC lost to a ranked team on their schedule, their argument would be stronger.

i strongly agree too with that but USC & LSU are
named co-CHAMPIONS which i think would be fare
because LSU have the #1 D in the nation would love
to see these two play

Strenght of schedule is true. But it's not USC's fault that their opponnets couldn't win more games. USC blew out every opponet except the game they lost. And the game against Cal was early in the season and it was a fluke. Oklahoma didn't even win their conference championship. They lost the last game of the season. How can they still be ranked number 1 going into the bowl games? I think the BCS has too many flaws.