The Jewish Grip on Our News and Entertainment Industries

There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's mass media of news and entertainment.

Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It is the power that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.

The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us what to think about that image. Essentially everything we know – or think we know – about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio, or our television.

It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories from our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of history-distorting TV "docu-dramas" that characterizes the opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of the news and the entertainment that they present to us.

For example, the way in which the news is covered: which items are emphasized and which are played down; the reporter's choice of words, tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines; the choice of illustrations – all of these things subliminally and yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or hear.

On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any remaining doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all. Employing carefully developed psychological techniques; they guide our thought and opinion so that we can be in tune with the "in" crowd, the "beautiful people," the "smart money." They let us know exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people and behavior by placing those people or that behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and having the other TV characters react in the politically correct way.

The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge to conform responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions through the TV characters for which he is writing, and disapproval of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity with his own views.

And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news, whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but they establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion.

As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish conflict and that it served Jewish interests rather than American interests to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's principal rival in the Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.

Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about "managed news" falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters – and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media – television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures – speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people that might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters.

They are presented with a single view of the world – a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish "holocaust" tale, the wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of aliens pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep and bear arms, the moral equivalence of all sexual orientations, and the desirability of a "pluralistic," cosmopolitan society rather than a homogeneous one. It is a view of the world designed by the media masters to suit their own ends – and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it.

And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews. It isn't simply a matter of the media being controlled by profit-hungry capitalists, some of whom happen to be Jews. If that were the case, the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect, at least approximately, the ratio of rich Gentiles to rich Jews. The preponderance of Jews in the media is so overwhelming, however, that we are obliged to assume that it is due to more than mere happenstance.

Re: Electronic News & Entertainment Media

Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry has resulted, not in the touted increased competition, but rather in an accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates. The largest of these conglomerates are rapidly growing even bigger by consuming their competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s. Whenever you watch television, whether from a local broadcasting station or via a cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine – it is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was produced and/or distributed by one of these megamedia companies.

The largest media conglomerate today is AOL-Time Warner, created when AOL bought Time Warner for $160 billion in 2000. The merger brought together Steve Case, a Gentile, as chairman of AOL-TW, and Time Warner chairman Gerald Levin, a Jew, as the CEO. Although AOL-TW isn't (yet) run entirely by Jews, the effect of this blend of leadership between a white capitalist whose biggest concern is money and a racially-conscious Jew will be gradually to increase the Jewish influence within AOL. Steve Case won't complain when Gerald Levin begins hiring mostly Jews to fill key positions beneath him because Case's own profits won't be affected. After Case dies or retires, the Jews will have complete control at AOL.

(Before the merger, AOL was the largest Internet service-provider in America, and it will now be used as an online platform for the Jewish content from Time Warner.)

Time Warner, Inc., with 1997 revenues of more than $13 billion, was the second largest of the international media leviathans when AOL bought it. Levin, chairman and CEO of Time Warner, had bought Turner Broadcasting Systems in 1996 from Ted Turner, who had been one of the few Gentile entrepreneurs in the media business. Ted Turner, as the company president, became the number-three man at AOL-TW, after Case and Levin.

When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner had made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN, with over 70 million subscribers. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews.

To block Turner's bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a "friendly" takeover of the company, and from 1986 until 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network were obstructed by Levin's Time Warner, which owns nearly 20% of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. When his fellow Jew Sumner Redstone offered to buy CBS for $34.8 billion in 1999, Levin had no objection.

Thus, despite being an innovator and garnering headlines, Turner never commanded the "connections" necessary for being a true media master. He finally decided if you can't lick 'em, join 'em, and he sold out to Levin. In July 2001, AOL Time Warner announced that yet another Jew, Walter Isaacson, formerly the editorial director of Time, Inc., would become the new chairman and CEO of CNN News Group, which oversees the news empire that Ted Turner built.

Time Warner's subsidiary HBO is the country's largest pay-TV cable network. Until the purchase in May 1998 of PolyGram by Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Warner Music was America's largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records. Warner Music was an early promoter of "gangsta rap." Through its involvement with Interscope Records (prior to Interscope's acquisition by MCA.

In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio, Castle Rock Entertainment, and New Line Cinema) and in publishing. Time Warner's publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune).

The second-largest media conglomerate today, with 1997 revenues of $23 billion, is the Walt Disney Company. Its chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as "a control freak," includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television) and cable networks with more than 100 million subscribers altogether.

As for feature films, the Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group, under Walt Disney Studios, headed by Joseph E. Roth (also a Jew), includes Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Roth founded Caravan Pictures in January 1993, and his fellow Jew Roger Birnbaum now heads it. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers, Bob and Harvey, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as, “The Crying Game,” “Priest,” and “Kids.”
When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family, prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to “Snow White,” the company under Eisner has expanded into the production of a great deal of so-called "adult" material.

In August 1995, Eisner acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., which owns the ABC Television Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Houston. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.

ABC's cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, who is a Jew. The corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and A & E Television Networks cable companies, with 67 million subscribers each. ABC Radio Network owns 26 AM and FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates.

Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1997. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications (Women's Wear Daily), Chilton Publications (automotive manuals), and the Diversified Publishing Group.

Number three on the list, with 1997 revenues of just over $13 billion, is Viacom, Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein). Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 13 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Redstone acquired CBS following the December 1999 stockholders' votes at CBS and Viacom.

Working for Redstone as CBS's chief executive is a Jew named Melvin A. Karmazin. He is the boss and biggest individual shareholder of the company that owns the CBS Television Network, 14 major-market TV stations, 160 radio stations, the Country Music Television and the Nashville Network cable channels, and a large number of outdoor advertising assets. Viacom's publishing division includes Simon & Schuster, Scribner, The Free Press, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video games.

Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience. The first quarter of 2001 was the 16th consecutive quarter in which MTV was rated as the #1 cable network for viewers between the ages of 12 and 24. MTV Networks plans to acquire The Music Factory (TMF) from the Dutch media and marketing group Wegener. TMF distributes music to almost 10 million homes in Holland and Belgium.

Nickelodeon, with about 65 million subscribers, has by far the largest share of the four-to-11-year-old TV audience in America and also is expanding rapidly into Europe. Most of its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy that is MTV's trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his kiddy viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV. As of early 2001, Nickelodeon was continuing a nine-year streak as the top cable network for children and younger teenagers.

Another Jewish media mogul is Edgar Bronfman, Jr. He headed Seagram Company, Ltd., the liquor giant, until its recent merger with Vivendi. His father, Edgar Bronfman, Sr., is president of the World Jewish Congress. Seagram owned Universal Studios and Interscope Records, the foremost promoter of "gangsta rap." These companies now belong to Vivendi Universal.

Bronfman became the biggest man in the record business in May 1998 when he also acquired control of PolyGram, the European record giant, by paying $10.6 billion to the Dutch electronics manufacturer Philips. With the revenue from PolyGram added to that from MCA and Universal, Bronfman became master of the fourth largest media empire, with annual revenues around $12 billion. One especially unfortunate aspect of the PolyGram acquisition was that it gave Bronfman control of the world's largest producer of classical music CDs: PolyGram owns the Deutsche Grammophon, Decca-London, and Philips record companies.

In June 2000, the Bronfman family sold Seagram to Vivendi, a French utilities company led by gentile Jean-Marie Messier. The combined company, Vivendi Universal, will retain Edgar Bronfman, Jr., as the vice chairman of the new company, and he will continue to be in charge of its entertainment division. The strategy for this merger seems to mirror that of AOL-Time Warner: infect and wait. Vivendi Universal will pay off the debts it assumed in the merger by selling Seagram's alcohol business, retaining its media empire.

With two of the top four media conglomerates in the hands of Jews, and with Jews in executive charge of the remaining two, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part.

Re: the other big media companies

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, which owns Fox Television Network, 20th Century Fox Films, and Fox 2000, is the fifth largest megamedia corporation in the country, with 1997 revenues of over $11 billion. It is the only other media company that comes even close to the top four. Murdoch is a Gentile Australian, but Peter Chernin, who is president and CEO of Fox Group, which includes all of News Corporation's film, television, and publishing operations in the United States, is a Jew. Under Chernin, as president of 20th Century Fox, is Laura Ziskin, a Jewess who formerly headed Fox 2000.

Jew Peter Roth works under Chernin as president of Fox Entertainment. News Corporation also owns the New York Post and TV Guide, and they are published under Chernin's supervision. Murdoch told Newsweek magazine (July 12, 1999) that he would probably elevate Chernin to CEO of News Corporation, rather than allow the company to fall into the hands of his own children, none of whom are younger than their late twenties. It is hard to imagine a Jew giving a major media corporation to a Gentile underling when he has children waiting in the wings. For his part, Chernin was quite candid: "I get to control movies seen all over the world…what could be more fun?"

Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as "the premier independent TV program producer in the United States," is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew who also owns Revlon cosmetics, and who offered a job to Monica Lewinsky when Bill Clinton was trying to keep her quiet.

The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. DreamWorks was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Considering the cash and connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, and Spielberg have, DreamWorks may soon be in the same league as the big four.

It is well known that Jews have controlled most of the production and distribution of films since shortly after the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. When Walt Disney died in 1966, the last barrier to the total Jewish domination of Hollywood was gone, and Jews were able to grab ownership of the company that Walt built. Since then they have had everything their way in the movie industry.

Films produced by just the four largest motion picture companies mentioned above – Disney, Warner Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram) – accounted for two-thirds of the total box-office receipts for the year 1997.

The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson; NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert; and CBS first by William Paley and then by Laurence Tisch. Over periods of several decades these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong.

NBC provides a good example of this. The executives at NBC recently were shuffled among the key positions. Andrew Lack, who had been chief of the network's news division, ascended to become its president and chief operations officer. Neal Shapiro, who had been producing Dateline NBC, moved into Lack's old job. Jeff Zucker, who had been producing the Today show, was promoted to NBC entertainment president (a job that apparently was created for him), and Jonathan Wald moved into Zucker's old spot after shoving aside Michael Bass, who had been filling in for Zucker with Today. Some time ago, Wald became the producer of the NBC Nightly News, taking the position from Jeff Gralnick. When Wald moved to Today, Steve Capus took over as Tom Brokaw's producer. It is not known at this time whether Capus is a Jew or not, but everyone else is.

A similar preponderance of Jews exists in the news divisions of the other networks. For example, in February 2000, Al Ortiz moved to head the "Special Events" coverage at CBS, making gentile Jim Murphy the executive producer of The CBS Evening News with Dan Rather – and the only exception that we know of to an otherwise solidly Jewish cadre of television news producers. The new CBS Early Show, which replaced CBS This Morning, had an internal shakeup in which three producers were fired, ostensibly for not being "aggressive" enough. One wonders whether they were also not Jewish enough. The shakeup did not, however, affect the outgoing executive producer Al Berman, who transferred to a new job as a program developer, and Steve Friedman has become the executive producer of the Early Show.

Paul Friedman is still the executive producer of ABC World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. Rick Kaplan, once an executive at ABC, moved to CNN in 1997, where he became the president of CNN/USA.

The Print Media

After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1483 different publications (this figure is for February 2000). One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of majority interests than a casual observer would think.

In 1945, four out of five American newspapers were independently owned and published by local people with close ties to their communities. Those days, however, are gone. Most of the independent newspapers were bought out or driven out of business by the mid-1970s. Today most "local" newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or even thousands of miles away. Today less than 20% of the country's 1483 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only 104 of the total number have circulations of more than 100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest must depend on these few for all of their national and international news.

The Associated Press, which sells content to newspapers, is currently under the control of its Jewish managing editor, Michael Silverman, who directs the day-to-day news reporting and supervises the editorial departments. Silverman had directed the AP's national news as assistant managing editor since 1992. He was promoted to his current job in 2000. Silverman reports to Jonathan Wolman, also a Jew, who is executive editor for the AP.

In only 47 cities in America are there more than one daily newspaper, and competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between morning and afternoon editions under the same ownership. Examples of this are the Mobile, Alabama, morning Register and afternoon Press-Register; and the Syracuse, New York, morning Post-Standard and afternoon Herald-Journal – all owned by the Jewish Newhouse brothers, through their holding company, Advance Publications.

The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 30 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country's largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group.

This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he bequeathed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions, the net worth of Advance Publications has grown to more than $8 billion today.

The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue – not the small change collected from a newspaper's readers – that largely pays the editor's salary and yields the owner's profit.

Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the last century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers – primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants.

Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation's three most prestigious and influential newspapers: The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. These three, dominating America's financial and political capitals, are the newspapers that set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones that decide what is news and what isn't, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.

The New York Times, with a September 1999 circulation of 1,086,000, is the unofficial social, fashion, entertainment, political, and cultural guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart set" which books to buy and which films to see; which opinions are in style at the moment; which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders, artists, and businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in the 19th century it was a genuinely American newspaper.

The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry J. Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great, great-grandson, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current publisher and the chairman of the New York Times Co. The executive editor is Joseph Lelyveld, also a Jew (he is a rabbi's son).

The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June 1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.

Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its "leaks" throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government.

The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John R. McLean, and later inherited by Edward B. McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former partner of the infamous Bernard Baruch, industry czar in America during the First World War.

The Washington Post was run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer's daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979 she appointed her son Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. The newspaper has a daily circulation of 763,000, and its Sunday edition sells 1.1 million copies.

The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers (the Gazette Newspapers, including 11 military publications); in television (WDIV in Detroit, KPRC in Houston, WPLG in Miami, WKMG in Orlando, KSAT in San Antonio, WJXT in Jacksonville); and in magazines, most notably the nation's number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Washington Post Company's various television ventures reach a total of about 7 million homes, and its cable TV service, Cable One, has 635,000 subscribers.

In a joint venture with the New York Times, the Post publishes the International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English-language daily in the world.

The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation's largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation that also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron's, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R. Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal.

Most of New York's other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the New York Daily News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish media mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm. And, as mentioned above, the New York Post is owned by News Corporation under the Jew Peter Chernin.

Re: News Magazines

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, films, music, and newspapers. Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any importance published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report.

Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the new media conglomerate formed by the 1989 merger of Time, Inc., with Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew.

Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.1 million.

U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.2 million, is owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who also has taken the position of editor-in-chief of the magazine for himself. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York's tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country.

Our Responsibility

Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of yearbooks on the radio and television industries and into directories of newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify their accuracy. They are undeniable, and when confronted with them Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of "anti-Semitism" for even raising the subject. It is fear of this accusation that keeps many persons who know the facts silent.

But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues! The Jewish control of the American mass media is the single most important fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There is nothing – plague, famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war – more dangerous to the future of our people.

Jewish media control determines the foreign policy of the United States and permits Jewish interests rather than American interests to decide questions of war and peace. Without Jewish media control, there would have been no Persian Gulf War, for example. There would have been no NATO massacre of Serb civilians. There would be no continued beating of the drums for another war against Iraq.

By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by parents, schools, or any other influence.

We must oppose the further spreading of this poison among our people, and we must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority, with values and interests different from our own. But to permit the Jews, with their 3,000-year history of nation wrecking, from ancient Egypt to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to national suicide. Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control, it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to break that control...

Originally posted by Aqil
Our Responsibility
We must oppose the further spreading of this poison among our people, and we must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority, with values and interests different from our own. But to permit the Jews, with their 3,000-year history of nation wrecking, from ancient Egypt to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to national suicide. Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control, it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to break that control...

For instance? What does anyone propose can be done to implement what is suggested here?

Having knowledge of this information would be a good start. We could then boycott those demented programs that the Jews produce, such as MTV and BET. They would have to take them off the air if Black people didn't watch them...

(See my post in the "Media Watch" thread...)

I have noticed a tendency for some people to accept what others on this board say as fact simply because they say "it is the truth" or they present it with authority. I am disturbed by the fact that no one has bothered to question the anti-Semitism on this thread.

The above Jewish conspiracy theory reminds me very much of what gays and lesbians jokingly refer to as "the international homosexual conspiracy" : the religious right's idea that gays are out to change the sexual orientation of every straight person, take over the media and take over the world while we're at it.

It is both interesting and sad that whenever conservatives notice that public opinion begins to accept what they don't like, that those conservatives then look for someone to blame. In this case it must be Jewish people - I'm sure they get together on a regular basis to mastermind the brainwashing of America. Why didn't I think of that before? :rolleyes:

For a people who is always screaming for acceptance and non-discrimination, many African-Americans sure have a lot of prejudices. There is long-standing tension between blacks and Asians, blacks and Jewish people, blacks and gays and lesbians. I am also really sick of conspiracy theories.

Let's all love one another and quit trying to create more division.

There are no "conspiracy theories," ms. gempis...read the following on the horrible atrocities committed by the Israelis on the indigenous people of Palestine.

In July 1947, the Palestinian government, in a supplementary memorandum to the UN Special Committee said: "When the war against Germany and Japan was seen to be approaching a successful conclusion, the Jews brought into action their weapons of lawlessness and terrorism in support of their own political aims and ambitions."

The memorandum pointed out: "The right of any community to use force as a means of gaining its political ends is not admitted in the British Commonwealth. Since the beginning of 1945, the Jews have implicitly claimed this right and have supported - by an organized campaign of lawlessness, murder and sabotage - their contention that, whatever other interests might be concerned, nothing should be allowed to stand in the way of a Jewish state and free Jewish immigration into Palestine."

"Neither Jewish ethics nor Jewish tradition can disqualify terrorism as a means of combat." (Yitzhak Shamir, "Journal of the LEHI," the Stern Gang, Summer, 1943) quoted in "Facts and Fables" by Clifford Wright, p.46)

"Two explosions took place in the Lebanese and French consulates in New York on July 7, 1982. The Jewish Defense League (JDL) announced its responsibility by a phone call for both explosions." A JDL spokesman denied the League's responsibility for the explosion. However, he added, "The league hails and encourages such operations. Similar incidents will increase in the future. We will not be surprised if armed Jews turn their guns on French diplomats and on all supporters of the PLO" (the former Palestinian Liberation Organization).

Ehud Barak, Israel's elected Labor Party leader, was caught off-guard on March 5, 1998. When asked on an Israeli television chat show what he would have done had he been born a Palestinian, he replied: "If I was at the right age, at some stage I would have entered one of the terror organizations and have fought from there, and later certainly have tried to influence from within the political system," he replied. It has been said that his remarks were "frank but not too smart."

Yet, interestingly enough, Israel and its supporters tend to define terrorism in such a way that acts described as "terror" are applied mostly to resistance groups and rarely to states. Palestinian guerrillas engage in "terrorist" acts while the Israeli soldiers honorably fight with "purity of arms." Unfortunately, in the U.S. the word "terrorist" has become synonymous with "Palestinian" This identification has clouded the judgment on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

The most recent definition of the word "terrorism" is used to describe any act against the state of Israel. No one has ever asked why any human being would willfully inflict pain and terror on himself and others as in the case of the Palestinians. Are the Palestinians just born terrorists running amuck to destroy the world and themselves? Or do they resort to terror tactics as a result of a desperate situation that threatens them with extermination as a historical and political nation?

Terror was adopted in the modern Middle East by pioneering Zionists. The Zionists generally employed terrorism to further their goals. Between 1939 and 1945, Zionist leaders in Palestine unleashed three bands of killers...the "Haganah" headed by Ben Gurion; the "Irgun Z'vai Leumi" headed by Menachem Begin, and the "Stern Gang" headed by Yitzhak Shamir, all of which specialized in inventing and committing a wide range of terrorism. Israeli leaders are the "Godfathers of Terrorism" in Palestine and in the Middle East.

"I need hardly stress the extent and development of the terrorist campaign which is being carried out in Palestine. Most dangerous development is the growth in numbers of Jewish young men and women who are infected with the gangster virus... these are providing recruits for the terrorist organizations..."

Sympathy and support for the Jewish terrorism was not confined to the Jewish community in Palestine. The terrorists had many sympathizers and supporters in the U.S., without whose contributions terrorism and sabotage would not have been possible. When Zionist terrorism was at its peak, Ben Hecht, a rich and influential Jewish Hollywood screen writer, published an encouraging "Letter to the Terrorists of Palestine" in the May 15, 1947 issue of the New York Herald Tribune. He said, "The Jews of America are for you. You are their champions. You are the grin they wear. You are the feather in their hats."

"In the past fifteen hundred years," he added, "every nation of Europe has taken a crack at the Jews. This time the British are at bat. You are the first answer that makes sense to the New World." (Sami Hadawi, Bitter Harvest, p.62)

"Every time you blow up a British arsenal, or wreck a British jail, or send a British railroad-train sky high, or rob a British bank, or let go with your guns and bombs at the British betrayers and invaders of your homeland," he gloated, "the Jews of America make a little holiday in their hearts." He concluded by assuring his brave friends: "We are working to help you. We are raising funds for you..."

The first car bomb was an invention of the Zionists...

Grenades in cafes, first used against Palestinians in Jerusalem on March 17, 1937...

Delayed-action, electrically-timed mines in crowded market places: First used against Palestinians in Haifa on July 6, 1938...

Blowing up a ship with its civilian passengers still on board: First in Haifa on November 25, 1940. The Zionists did not hesitate to blow up their own people to protest the British policy of strict Jewish immigration to Palestine.

The ship "Patria" had 1,700 Jewish immigrants...253 lives were lost. The ship "Struma," carrying 760 Jewish immigrants, sank in the Black Sea as a result of an explosion on February 24, 1942...760 Jewish lives were lost. In later years, it was admitted that the Haganah general staff had the ship blown up in order to lay the charge at the door of the Mandate government.

Assassination of government official outside Palestine: First used against the British in Cairo on November 6, 1944 when Lord Moyne, Secretary of State, was assassinated by the Stern Gang. Yitzhak Shamir, a member of the Irgun and later leader of the Stern Gang, was behind the plan...

Taking of hostages to put pressure on a government: First used against the British in Tel Aviv on June 18, 1946...

Blowing up government offices with their civilian employees and visitors: First used against the British in Jerusalem on July 22, 1946. The toll was 91 Britons and 46 injured in the King David Hotel. Menachem Begin, who masterminded and carried out the attack, admitted that the massacre was coordinated with and carried out under the instructions of the Haganah...

Booby-trapped suitcase: First used against the British Embassy in Rome on October 13, 1946...

Booby-trapped car parked alongside buildings: First used against the British in Sarafand on December 5, 1946...

Flogging of hostages: First used against the British in Tel Aviv, Natanya and Rishon on December 29, 1946...

Letter bombs sent to politicians outside Palestine: First used against Britain when 20 letter bombs were sent from Italy to London between June 4-6, 1947...

Murder of hostages as a reprisal for government actions: First used against the British in the Natanya area on July 29-30, 1947, and making a booby trap out of their bodies. The note left with the bodies read: "This is the sentence of the Irgun's High Command..."(New York Times, Aug. 1947...)

Postal parcel-bomb sent outside Palestine: First used against the British in London on Sept. 3, 1947...

Assassination of UN Mediator Count Folke Bernadotte and his French aide on Sept. 17, 1948. The Stern Gang planned and executed the assassination because he made suggestions to vary the partition plan of Palestine. "If the world listens to Bernadotte and pressures our weakling government into making concessions, we will have lost our State." Sheib said. "We can't let this happen. We must show the world that it is just as futile for the UN to interfere in our affairs as it was for the British..."

The Zionist record of terror in the '30s and '40s was long and bloody, yet it has been neglected when discussing terrorism in the Middle East. Both former prime ministers, Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, were terrorist commanders. Many former terrorists are today honored in Israel. For example, the Israeli Knesset issued a series of commemorative stamps for Shlomo Ben Yosif, who was hanged by the British for crimes against Arabs and for the murders of Lord Moyne in 1944 in Cairo. His body lay in the Jerusalem Hall of Heroism after being given a military burial in Mt. Herzl...

The Irgun killed 79 Palestinians in terror attacks in July, 1938. The official history of the Irgun describes in glorifying terms the murder of 27 Palestinians celebrating the British decision to limit the Jewish immigration...52 Palestinians were also murdered when a number of Irgun members were arrested by the British...

Between Dec. 13, 1947 and Feb. 10, 1948, 161 Palestinians were killed and 330 injured by Irgun, Stern and Haganah terrorist attacks on market places and cafes. Bus attacks in the same period killed 15 Palestinians. On Dec. 30, 1947, the "Palmach" (the strike force of the Haganah) attacked and massacred 60 Palestinian villagers of Balad Al-Sheikh...

On April 9-10, 1948, 250 Palestinian villagers were slaughtered. Mutilating the bodies before death, the culprits cut off parts and opened the bellies of others. Nursing babies were butchered on the bosoms of their helpless mothers.[/b] The Irgun and the Stern Gang captured the village of Deir Yassin and committed the notorious massacre. Begin confirmed that the Haganah approved the deed. Begin glorified the massacre and its benefits for Zionist goals: "Out of evil, however, good came...the legend was worth half-a-dozen battalions to the forces of Israel..."

The village of Sa'sa, near the Lebanese border, was attacked, 20 houses were blown over their inhabitants and some 60 Arabs were killed...

In the battle for Kattamon Quarter of Jerusalem, Arab women working in the St. Simon Monastery as servants were killed...

On Jan. 5, 1948 the Jewish Agency leader Ben Gurion and Haganah Sneh and Galililee stepped up their barbaric attack against the Palestinian civilians in Kattamon, Jerusalem, They blew up the Semiramis Hotel, killing innocent people and wounding many...

In Lydda town, July 12, 1948, the Palmach went from house to house...firing on every moving target - killing more than 250 Palestinians...

On Oct. 28-29, 1948, another unpublished massacre occurred in the village of El-Dawayma, a Haifa sub-district...20 tanks from Moshe Dayan's 89th Battalion surrounded the village and committed mass murder against the civilian inhabitants. Among the victims were 75 elderly who could not flee and found refuge in a mosque...35 family members were discovered hiding in a cave and were machine-gunned to death...

The massacre of Qibya, northwest of Jerusalem, carried out by Unit 101 under the command of Ariel Sharon on Oct. 14, 1953, was a continuation of the brutal terrorism intended to annihilate the Palestinian people. The government claimed that Israeli settlers carried it out, but records proved that it was sanctioned by the acting Prime Minister Moshe Sharrett, and was planned by Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon, the Chief of Central staff Mordacai Maklt, and Chief of Operations General Moshe Dayan, in concert with vacationing Prime Minister David Ben Gurion.

On March 28, 1954, the Israeli army launched a massive attack on the village of Nahalin near Bethlehem, massacring several dozen Palestinians and demolishing houses...

One of the most notorious acts of terror that caused a political crisis in Israel was the Lavon affair. In July 1954, an Israeli spy ring operating in Cairo planted bombs in British and American cultural and information centers to discredit the Egyptian regime at the time...

On Feb. 28, 1955, the Israeli army attacked Gaza and killed 39 civilians, including children...
On Oct. 29, 1956, the Israeli Frontier Guards slaughtered about 52 innocent villagers in Kafr Qasim, near the Jewish settlement of Betah Tekfa. "With two or three exceptions, the press has been party to a conspiracy of silence, throwing a veil over the incident. It wrote of "condemned men" instead of a killing in Kafr Qasim; it wrote of a "mistake" and a "misfortune" and a "regrettable incident." When it mentioned the victims of the calamity, it was hard to tell whom it meant, the dead or the killers..."

During the short invasion of Sinai and Gaza on Oct. 29, 1956, the Israelis committed atrocities against the refugees of the Khan Yunis refugee camp. They lined hundreds of civilians against the walls and killed a great number in cold blood...

On June 5, 1967, Israel unleashed the Six-Day War against Egypt, Syria, and Jordan. The American ship USS Liberty was in the Mediterranean Sea monitoring the course of war. The Israelis were upset to discover that it was able to de-code their messages. Moshe Dayan personally ordered it be destroyed. The resulting unprovoked massacre caused 34 Americans to lose their lives, and 171 were wounded. Dayan was hailed as a hero in the U.S. media. They never mentioned this massacre...

In Sept. 1972, Israeli fighter-planes attacked the Syrian resort of al-Himma, south of Damascus, killing 200 civilians...machined-gunned them as they ran for cover...

In July 1981, an Israeli bomber hit the Fakhani district of Beirut, a Palestinian refugee camp, and killed 300 people, all civilians...

The Sabra and Shatila Massacre: All the above-mentioned massacres are particularly pale compared to the carnage at the Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut, Lebanon in 1982, during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon.The mass murder of 2,750 men, women and children – whose only crime was to be homeless exiles from their native land – by Phalangist Militia was inspired by the Israelis. The principal war criminal bearing legal responsibility for the massacre was then-Israeli Defense Minister, Gen. Ariel Sharon, perpetrator of the Qibya massacre, and Foreign Minister Yitzhak Shamir, associated with Deir Yassin massacre and assassination of UN mediator Count Folke Bernadotte. Responsibility was shared by Prime Minister Menachem Begin, guilty of atrocities in both the King David Hotel and the Deir Yassin massacres...

The number of Palestinians and Lebanese civilians killed when Israel invade Lebanon in 1982 was estimated to have been over 19,000 people...

In Nov. 1985, Jonathan Pollard, an Israeli mole in U.S. Naval intelligence, was sentenced to life in March 1997, for spying for the Jewish state...

From Dec. 9, 1987 through Dec. 8, 1989 (the period of the Intifada), under the policy of "broken bones," 824 Palestinians were killed by Israeli soldiers and/or Jewish settlers. Of these 176 were children under 16, and 71 of them were women and young girls...598 of them were shot, including 121 children, 29 women and girls. 55 Palestinians were killed by beating, burning or stoning; 84 were killed by tear gas, and 87 by other means...13 men died while being tortured in prison, and 80,000 Palestinians were seriously injured...

More than 50,000 Palestinians have been arrested – over 1,000 of them women – and at least 14,000 Palestinians are being held in Israeli prisons and concentration camps; 8,500 Palestinians have been administratively detained; 6,237 curfew days have been imposed on Palestinian towns and villages in the West Bank and Gaza; 1,225 homes have been demolished or sealed, leaving 11,000 Palestinian homeless; and 77,608 mature olive trees and fruits have been uprooted...

By the end of 1991, the Palestinian Human Rights Information Center of Jerusalem and Chicago reported that 994 Palestinians were killed by Israeli troops; 119,300 injured; 66 deportations, and 405 others to Marj al-Zuhor on the Lebanon border; 16,000 administrative detentions; 94,830 acres of land illegally confiscated; 2,074 homes demolished or sealed; 10,000 round-the-clock curfews of areas over 10,000 population; and 120,000 olive trees and fruits uprooted...

On Oct. 8, 1990 the Israeli police gunned down in cold blood 21 Palestinian worshipers and injured 150 on the grounds of Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem (the area is known as "Haram al Sharif"). Police claimed that the mosque preacher urged the crowds to slaughter Jews...

On Feb. 25, 1994 – during Ramadan – about 250 worshipers were slaughtered in the Al-Ibrahimi mosque in Hebron by an American Jewish settler called "Goldstein." To this day Goldstein's grave is a pilgrimage site for Jewish settlers...

On April 18, 1996, Israeli shells rained down on the UN compound in Qana, Lebanon. When the shells had finished their work, more than 100 civilians were murdered, including 24 children - aged 3 months to 9 years old. One survivor lost 25 relatives in the attack...

On Sept. 25, 1997, two Israeli MOSSAD (Israeli intelligence) tried to assassinate Khalid Mishal, the political leader of the Muslim Resistance Movement of Palestine in Amman, Jordan. In March, 1998 Sharon, the Infrastructure Minister in the Israeli Government, warned that Israel would eventually assassinate Khalid Mishal. That is an explicit confirmation that Israel is still using terror to further its goals...

This list of Israeli terrorism is by no means a complete list of all their crimes. It's a small wonder that all their crimes fail to earn the "terrorism" label. All of them are either "regrettable incidents," "isolated incidents," or done by a "deranged person..."


(Conspiracy theories, ms. gempis??? Go figure...)

Wow, a Biblical, anti-Semetic, homophobic, African-American astrologer who defends all of the above with vigor. Ya gotta love this site.

:puke:
Wow, a Biblical, anti-Semetic, homophobic, African-American astrologer who defends all of the above with vigor. Ya gotta love this site.I am aghast in stupefaction at your idiotic response...

You've not heard anything from me, that even in the remotest sense, should be misconstrued as anti-semitic, I base everything I say on what Israel has done, I have balanced my comments on Israel [which I have hardly given here in this regard] with the sufferings of Jews during WW II and concluded that, as a people they have learnt nothing from it.

I admit I did not post material on Jewish suffering to elicit sympathy for Jews,but then neither have I posted criticisms on Israel out of hatred for anyone.

To critique Israel based on actual events that have already occurred or are playing out right now today, is not to be racist towards people of Jewish descent.

I am not an anti-semite, I am an anti zionist [that is, another apartheid system in Palestine at the hands of the nation of Israel which had its concrete beginnings in 1948-49 ] I am anti imperialist.

I will talk in the same way and have about corrupt African leaders who inflict pain and suffering on their own people in the interests of their own bank accounts and nepotism.

Does that make me a racist towards blacks?

And read the opinions Henry Kissinger toward the uniting of Africans, the evidence that suggests strongly, that AIDS is man made with a higher affinity for those of African descent, that Ebola is also man made, that the CIA has been active in the perpetuation of war on the African continent, that the US was active in supporting Apartheid, that Henry Kissinger, wrote about and promoted the idea that nothing good could ever be able come out of Africa [something taken on board by many Africans themselves even as they claim they are awake] and that it was up to 'the good people of the United States' to drag Africa back from the edge before it became, 'a festering disaster of our age'.

"Depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World".
"Reduction of the rate of population in these states is a matter of vital US national security".
"The US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries. That fact gives the US enhanced interests in the political, economic and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and the economic interest of the United States".

The National Security Council. NSSM 200 - "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security & Overseas Interests", Washington DC, the White House, December 10, 1974. Declassified July 3, 1989.

Written by Dr.Henry Kissinger

This same man wrote about ways in which the US government could go about making sure that Africans never unite, a link to an article talking about it was posted elsewhere on this forum a one or two weeks ago.

Then there's Israel's failure to support Africa in it's attempts to discuss the issue of reparations for victims of European racism, along with poland and the rest of the usual suspects, even though you'd think that given their history of oppression and that they have sought [and received] reparations for the terrors of WW II, that they would understand and lend their support, like I said, they have learnt nothing.

I could go on but frankly I can't be bothered, suffice to say, go read something before calling people anti-semites.

Oh, and you confuse posting with 'spirit' with posting with 'authority'.
I believe what I say strongly but they are my opinions, I am not an authority, merely an observer, but do the reading and see what you yourself observe.


From Mathaba.net

[I posted this in its entirety because after a few day, the article will disappear behind a vault toward which, a subscription must be paid to access the articles.

So there you go.

Peace.


Bringing an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land is as much a prerequisite for peace in the Middle East as is the Palestinian recognition of Israel. The Israeli occupation is not only inhuman and the cause of extreme suffering for the 3.5 million Palestinians living under its subjugation, but it is also illegal under international law. Attempts to claim otherwise have no legal validity and are morally bankrupt and politically dangerous since they basically preclude the achievement of peace.

While it is true that victorious powers can legally occupy hostile territories seized in the course of conflict – an example of which is the Allies’ occupation of the territory of Nazi Germany during World War II- foreign occupation should nevertheless be a temporary situation, pending a political settlement or solution. During the interim, the occupying Power must comply with relevant instruments of international humanitarian law with regard to its conduct in the territory it has occupied.

International law is very clear on two basic principles: the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the prohibition of the transfer of civilians of the occupying Power to the occupied territory. Both are intended to prevent expansionism and the colonization of occupied territories. Both complement another explicit principle of international law, namely the right of peoples to self-determination, a right that a colonial or occupying Power is obliged to respect. The Israeli occupation has clearly violated all three of these principles of international law. In fact, throughout its prolonged occupation, Israel has persistently and aggressively breached international law.

Thus, what makes the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land illegal is not the fact that it occurred during the war of 1967 (regardless of the narrative concerning the causes of the war). What makes the Israeli occupation illegal is that it has existed for 35 years, during which time it transformed into a form of colonialism and suppressed and oppressed an entire people for decades, preventing them from the exercise of their right to self-determination and the establishment of their State, Palestine.

Israel, as an occupying Power, has undertaken countless measures attempting to change the legal status, demographic composition and character of the territory by confiscating land, exploiting natural resources, building more than 250 settlements, transferring more than 400,000 Israelis to the occupied territories, constructing an apartheid Wall to imprison people, establishing a dual system of law and even annexing part of the territory. These actions have been carried out in direct contravention of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, which, among other things, defines the rules of conduct and the obligations of the occupying Power. Clearly then, the active intent of the Israeli occupation has been to negate Palestinian rights, to create new facts on the ground and to illegally expand Israel’s borders.

Security Council resolution 242 (1967), which is the bedrock of the peace process and of any future peace settlement, is anchored in the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war. The old and deceptive argument that the resolution calls for withdrawal from "territories" and not "the territories" not withstanding (in fact, the French text of the resolution does contain the article "the"). The call in the resolution for the withdrawal of Israel can only be read within the context of the above-mentioned principle.

Since the onset of the Israeli occupation in 1967, and in response to established, illegal policies and practices of the occupying Power, the Security Council has adopted 26 resolutions that affirmed the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention to the territories occupied by Israel. Of those resolutions, several deal directly with the issue of Israeli settlements and several also specifically deal with Israeli violations in Occupied East Jerusalem. The resolutions clearly address the illegality of Israel’s policies and practices with regard to both issues. For example, some of the resolutions affirm that the Israeli settlements "have no legal validity"; call upon the government and people of Israel "to dismantle the existing settlements"; and call upon "all States not to provide Israel with any assistance to be used specifically in connection with settlements in the occupied territories".

As for Occupied East Jerusalem, which the Israeli government illegally annexed in 1980, the Security Council, in resolution 478 (1980), determined "that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purport to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and, in particular, the recent "basic law" on Jerusalem are null and void and must be rescinded forthwith". Similar affirmations were made by the Council in several other resolutions. Moreover, the General Assembly and other U.N. organs have adopted scores of resolutions on the illegal policies and practices of the Israeli occupation and on the legitimacy of, and the necessity for, the exercise of the right to self-determination by the Palestinian people.

UN resolutions, addressed both the Palestinian and Israeli sides, was widely viewed as a necessary and responsible call that intended to, and should, help the parties to move forward towards a peaceful settlement. For this to happen, the Israeli people and the Israeli government must indeed come to terms, for once and for all, with the illegality of their occupation and the need for its termination.

Ed.’s Note: The author is Ambassador and Permanent Observer of Palestine to the United Nations

Well I guess we're even, Aqil, because I am always aghast at your incredible ignorance. Have fun bashing Jewish people. Buh bye.

The above Jewish conspiracy theory reminds me very much of what gays and lesbians jokingly refer to as "the international homosexual conspiracy" : the religious right's idea that gays are out to change the sexual orientation of every straight person, take over the media and take over the world while we're at it."While WE'RE at it"...hmmmmmm. What does this mean, ms. gempis?? :confused:

gempis, what's so intersting is that you haven't presented any proof that aqil is wrong, yet you keep coming back with the same rhetoric, "aqil is just anti-semite," "aqil is just bashing Jewish people."


look at things for what they really are. We can't always afford to be "politically correct."

^5 Lktpolit...It is easier to be critical than to be correct...

"It is easier to be critical than to be correct..."

true

Some of the problems in the Black communities are by our own hands...

There were many Jews who marched for Civil Rights beside Blacks.

By the way, my father is Jewish and I don't view him as evil.

Lktpolit said
"Look at things for what they really are. We can't always afford to be politically correct."

By that stand, neither Jew or Palestinian are purely innocent and blameless.

Dirt is the easiest thing to dig from a people and race..

jh.

By that stand, neither Jew or Palestinian are purely innocent and blameless.

True, but the way I see it, I have to support Palestinians, from a historical point of view.

Who was the land offered to FIRST by the British after they appropriated the land in their attempts to control the Arab territories previously ruled by the Ottomans.

Arabs, who made up approx 70% of the population in 1895 [the rest of the population being made of - amongst others -Jewish people], were promised the land in exchange for their services in helping to defeat the Turks [Ottoman Empire] during WWI, Arabs would get Palestine, the British would take Jordan and Iraq and the French would get Lebanon and Syria.

[At this time, the Jewish people owned less than 1% of the land.]

This turned out to be a lie, the British has no intention of giving Palestine to the Arabs [surprise] so they decided they would share the land with France.

Again, the British reneged on the deal, this time with the French after stringing the Jewish people [who became desperate for land during WWII and were trying to get either Argentina or Palestine] for 30 years in promising to give them the land.

After WWII, Israel was made a state in 1947/8 and went from owning 8% of the land in 1946 to owning 53% in 47/8.

By 1949 they owned 77%, today Israel owns the vast majority.

So while the Palestinian people claim a greater right to the land:

1) Because they made up the largest portion of the population

2) The land were Arab

3) The land of Palestine was promised to them in exchange for the fighting for the British, and I imagine some of them died during this,

Israel's claim is that ownership is 9/10 of the law [including lands acquired through war]

That being the case, then is Africa in the wrong to claim land back that was 'acquired' by colonialist Europe?....or are African American not entitled to regaining what was taken from them and so on.

Seen in that light and with the full historical facts, well, I find it hard not to side with Arabs.

[No, I'm not an anti-semite]

But yes in pitting themselves against each other, in support of what they believe is their right to the land, it is likely they have been as bad as each other, that is the nature of war and to be expected.

Peace...........

one word defines history- debatable.

Debatable, I guess, in the same way some people do not believe the holocaust actually happened, or happened to the extent that history tells....but to be found in every history book, article and essay on the matter.

If you wish to disagree with them all, please free to do so, you have that right.




Peace

Quote: “They are presented with a single view of the world – a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races…”

More than the equality of races, I see the homogenization of the races… rather than really representing true diversity, television or media diversity is only skin deep… like different colored skittles. There is no real interest in culture of any kind. Jewish or otherwise… only in the most simplistic, stereotypical way.

Quote: “The inerrant nature of the Jewish "holocaust" tale…”

What errors are being overlooked in reference to what we have learned about the holocaust? I don’t think this is something the media promotes… the box office success of certain films seems the more likely cause of friendly attitudes toward the holocaust… or is this resentment that slavery hasn’t gotten as much treatment… I’ll agree with that… neither has the Native American genocide or the horrible things occurring in Mexico or in Palestine or in Africa or other places where systematic oppression goes unnoticed past and present… I don’t think the answer lies in attacking the holocaust but in promoting progress in the other lesser known areas… It reminds me of abused women arranging themselves in a hierarchy of who was abused the worst… any and all abuse was and is bad! We could defiantly play to win on an argument about Slavery vs. Holocaust but what the benefit in that?

Quote: “The wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of aliens pouring across our borders.”

Being from Texas, and in light of the aftermath of September eleventh… I completely disagree with this statement… I have seen no promotion of unlimited immigration or the hint that halting immigration would be wicked… in this area I feel that our government is horribly hypocritical… illegal aliens are called wicked and treated harshly but on the other hand exploited for their very cheap labor… It’s a horrible situation… I’m no expert but I don’t get this vibe at all. I don’t feel either, that this view is Jewish as much as it is Capitalist… Opportunistic…

Quote: “The moral equivalence of all sexual orientations.”

Less Jewish… More Hollywood… The view shown on television is not representative of all of America… It does influence opinions however…

Quote: “And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews. It isn't simply a matter of the media being controlled by profit-hungry capitalists, some of whom happen to be Jews. If that were the case, the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect, at least approximately, the ratio of rich Gentiles to rich Jews. The preponderance of Jews in the media is so overwhelming; however, that we are obliged to assume that it is due to more than mere happenstance.”

I agree that the media is dominated by Jews… but I don’t believe that means you must discount capitalism as the motivation for the things you describe… You say that “If that were the case, the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect, at least approximately, the ratio of rich Gentiles to rich Jews.” Why? Why can’t they all be opportunistic capitalist Jews… Why does race have to be the main factor? And it is not happenstance. It’s been this way since the twenties… the time when the media and our consumer culture as we know it today was born… I do think their culture as emigrants and outsiders helped the original Jews who took over film and media construct the America of their dreams which became the American dream… the American ideal… but in taking up their roles in capitalist, consumer America they were abandoning their culture… their racial heritage… and at that time, and today, they are not embraced because of their race or culture but because of their business skills, moneymaking skills… bankability… I’m not sure what you are trying to say by highlighting their race… the fact that they are Jewish… I think it is enough to say that they are not black… are not representative of the viewers so… what they produce… their points of view are skewed… It is enough to remember that most of what we see on TV is designed to make us buy something… to buy into an ideal that will take much monetary investment to obtain…

I like a lot of the stuff you have to say but… I think you oversimplified your argument…

Quote: “Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry has resulted, not in the touted increased competition, but rather in an accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates. The largest of these conglomerates are rapidly growing even bigger by consuming their competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s. Whenever you watch television, whether from a local broadcasting station or via a cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine – it is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was produced and/or distributed by one of these megamedia companies.”

Again… why is this a Jewish thing and not a opportunistic capitalist thing? I’m not saying they just happen to be Jewish… their culture got them there but their culture isn’t what keeps them there.

Quote: “To block Turner's bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a "friendly" takeover of the company, and from 1986 until 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network were obstructed by Levin's Time Warner, which owns nearly 20% of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. When his fellow Jew Sumner Redstone offered to buy CBS for $34.8 billion in 1999, Levin had no objection.”

Again are you saying they got him because he was Jewish or because he was ruthless… how would this be any better if these people were a representative ratio of all races? Anglo, Hispanics, Asian Americans and Afro Americans? It would still not be in the interest of their particular races… but in the interest of the rich moguls getting richer… or are you saying that men of other races wouldn’t behave in this way?

Quote: “Jewish media control determines the foreign policy of the United States and permits Jewish interests rather than American interests to decide questions of war and peace. Without Jewish media control, there would have been no Persian Gulf War, for example. There would have been no NATO massacre of Serb civilians. There would be no continued beating of the drums for another war against Iraq.”

WOW! I think this is a huge oversimplification! Jews in Media determine our foreign policy! What interest do Jews have in Iraq! I’ll buy the Palestinian conflicts… but… Prove this stuff! I think the primary interest of Jewish publications is selling magazines or at least advertisement in them… selling papers… right? Honestly if Jews disappeared from the planet right now do you suddenly think mass media will be in the interest of most Americans? Will be more representative… I’m not saying it’s not a problem… I just think it’s bigger than the Jews…


I think this is an important topic… one that shouldn’t center on one race… I think it is bigger than that and more illusive… It’s systematic mind control… I think we should look closely at the implications of the news and the mass media… and be aware of the fact that their interests are never necessarily your interests… they are going to air what will bring in the most money… It’s funny that there is a general feeling that we’ve come far with race relations and sexual acceptance in the media… but if you look at the 70’s programming and films… they were (at times) much more progressive than what we see today… I mean black programming is basically segregated to the WB… Why? Because of the Jews? It’s bigger than that… And while it would be easy to see a pattern and point the finger we can just rely on a simple answer… even when we can’t see the man or put a label on him… he’s out there… I know that sounds wacko… but often the enemy is nameless and faceless… racism… or at least focusing on a race is what the man has used to divide America since the revolutionary war… but I do think it is important to have Awareness… look for messages in the things you see on TV and read in the paper… That’s what we can do… Look for the messages and resist them…

AWARENESS AND RESISTANCE


Not attacking you personally Aqil and not as thorough or as eloquent as you so be nice… :) Just expressing my (very humble) opinion… GREAT TOPIC!!! (First Post)… :look:

Brittny

P.S. I hate what Israel is doing to the Palestinians but honestly… what else do Capitalist countries do to get ahead…

USA: Indentured servants, Native Americans, African Slaves, Poor Immigrant Workers Hawaii and other colonies… , Mexican Illegal Labor… just a few of the exploited…

Great Britain: India, America, Areas in Asia and other colonies… just a few of the exploited…

It’s sort of difficult to scold your friends for using the same methods you used to get on top… It’s ugly and I hate it but it’s true…


"Resistance is the Secret of Joy." Alice Walker :)

blackdove:

The tiny state of Israel, which illegally occupies the country of Palestine, is the real evil empire - an evil empire built on credit. The state is called "Israel," but the country is called Palestine, and the holy city of Jerusalem is its capital.

The country of Palestine is geographically located on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea, between 29º and 33º north latitude, and between 34º and 36º east longitude. On most maps the name “Israel” is printed in bold letters, but if you look closely you will see that the name “P-A-L-E-S-T-I-N-E” is always written across the whole of the country, which includes the West Bank, the Golan Heights, and the Gaza Strip – lands that are presently occupied (militarily) by the Israeli Government...

The state of Israel is about the size of Vermont. One would have to look very close to see it on a map of the Middle East. Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula is larger than the state of Israel. Yet the Western world is bombarded daily via the media by news and events originating from Tel Aviv, the communications center of this small Jewish state. Why? Because the rich, powerful, highly-militaristic Zionist entity – which controls the media in both Israel and the U.S. – is almost fanatically intent upon perpetuating Jewish thought and Western ideology throughout the world, via capitalism and Christianity...

The real devil of the world is not the racist Caucasian or WASP, but the Jew, because the Jew is almost entirely responsible for basic Caucasian mentality. He invented communism (Karl Marx was Jewish), and conspired with the European (i.e., King James of England) in the creation of capitalism and Christianity in the early 17th century, when the Bible was first translated into the English language.

Zionism is the ideology that is central to the existence of the state of Israel, which was established in the country of Palestine on May 14, 1948. Prior to this time Palestine was a British colony on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea, inhabited by native Palestinians and also by many Jews...

The Zionist movement was born at the First Zionist Congress of 1897, with Theodor Herzl (1860-1904) as its main inspiration. Whereas in previous centuries Zionism had been inextricably linked with a specifically religious orientation, expressed in the hope that God would redeem “His people” by bringing them back to the Holy Land, it now underwent a more nationalistic and political transformation.

In 1917 the Balfour Declaration, by which British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour pledged to Lord Lionel Rothschild – leader of the British Zionists – Britain’s support for the establishment of a “national home” for the Jewish people in the country of Palestine, “provided nothing was done to prejudice the rights of the indigenous inhabitants.”

But this was not to be, for the native Palestinians revolted as a result of the forceful takeover of their homelands by the Jews of Europe. Thousands were uprooted and killed, and millions more fled into exile. They are presently dispersed throughout the Middle East, but mainly in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the West Bank and Gaza Strip – where they live under Israeli military occupation.

Several years ago the United Nations adopted an anti-Zionist resolution that equated Zionism with racism. Seventy-two member-nations signed the resolution, including the former Soviet Union and China.

Racism finds its roots in Zionism because, to quote famed occultist Eliphas Levi: “For the Jew God is separate from humanity; He does not live in His creatures. He is infinite egoism.” This thought is also rooted in Judaism (the religion of the Jews), and is the reason why the Jew thinks that he can do anything he wants to do in this world with impunity. He is “God’s chosen,” so he says, and is therefore better than everyone else. This is pure racism, and it finds its roots in Judaism and Zionist ideology...

There will never be any peace in the Middle East (and consequently the world) until the Holy City of Jerusalem, which is presently under Israeli control, is internationalized. Jerusalem is the third holiest city in the religion of Islam, after Mecca and Medina. One of the most beautiful mosques in the world – the famous Al-Aqsa masjid (called the “Dome of the Rock”) – is in Jerusalem. It was built in 691 AD, on top of the Jewish temple that was destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD, and remains a center of conflict to this very day because the Jews have vowed to rebuild their holy temple on the same site. All that is left of their temple is their sacred “Wailing Wall.”

Jerusalem was a Palestinian city before Abraham the Patriarch crossed the Euphrates River on his way to the “Promised Land” (i.e., the country of Canaan) some 4,000 years ago. It was originally built and inhabited by an African people called the “Jebusites.” The earliest notice of the city is in the Old Testament book of Joshua [15:8, 18:16, and 18:28]. Here Jerusalem is called “Ha-Jebusi” (the Jebusite) after its occupiers. The word “Jebus” is also found in Judges 19:10-11: “Jebus,” which is Jerusalem...the city of the Jebusites. They were the direct descendants of Canaan, who was the son of Ham and Noah’s grandson. Although the Jews presently claim the city of Jerusalem as the capital of the state of Israel, Biblical history offers irrefutable proof of the fact that Jerusalem is the Arab capital of the Arab country of Palestine...

And so the Zionist Jew, the real devil of the world, continues to lay claim to the land of Palestine, calling it Israel, which is the real evil empire an empire built on credit (American aid to Israel amounts to more than $5 BILLION per year). The oppressed Palestinian people continue their fervent struggle to regain their homeland through their Intifada movement, striking the heavily-armed Israelis whenever and wherever they can. The Israelis and their American cohorts in the media call them “terrorists,” whereas throughout the Middle East they are known as freedom-fighters...

There is only one way to end terrorism and have peace in the world today, and that is to settle the Palestinian question...

The tiny state of Israel has over 200 weapons of mass destruction in its military arsenal, blackdove...nuclear warheads. Yet nothing is ever said about that in the Western media...

THE INTERNATIONAL JEW

By Henry Ford

The story of the Jews in America begins with Christopher Columbus. On August 2, 1492, more than 300,000 Jews were expelled from Spain, and on August 3, the next day, Columbus set sail for the West, taking a group of Jews with him. They were not, however, refugees, for the prophetic navigator’s plans had aroused the sympathy of influential Jews for a long period previously. Columbus himself tells us that he consorted much with Jews. The first letter he wrote detailing his discoveries was to a Jew.

Indeed, the eventful voyage itself – which added to men’s knowledge and wealth “the other half of the Earth” – was made possible by Jews. The pleasant story that it was Queen Isabella’s jewels that financed the voyage has disappeared under cool research. There were three Maranos, or “secret Jews,” who wielded great influence in the Spanish Court: Luis de Santagel, who was an important merchant of Valencia who was “farmer” of the royal taxes; his relative, Gabriel Sanchez, who was the royal treasurer; and their friend, the royal chamberlain, Juan Cabrero. These men worked unceasingly on Queen Isabella’s imagination – picturing to her the depletion of the royal treasury and the likelihood of Columbus discovering the fabulous gold of the Indies – until the Queen was ready to offer her jewels in pawn for the funds. But Santagel craved permission to advance the money himself, which he did – 17,000 ducats in all, about 5,000 pounds (perhaps equal to 40,000 pounds today).

Associated with Columbus in the voyage were at least five Jews: Luis de Torres, interpreter; Marco, the surgeon; Bernal, the physician; Alonzo de la Calle and Gabriel Sanchez. Luis deTorres was the first man ashore, and the first to discover the use of tobacco. He settled in Cuba, and was said to be the father of Jewish control of the tobacco business as it exists today.Columbus’ old patrons, Luis de Santagel and Gabriel Sanchez, received many privileges for the part they played in the work, but Columbus himself became the victim of a conspiracy fostered by Bernal, the ship’s doctor, and suffered injustice and imprisonment as his reward.

From that beginning, Jews looked more and more to America as a fruitful field, and immigration set in strongly toward South America, principally Brazil. But because of military participation in a disagreement between the Brazilians and the Dutch, the Jews of Brazil found it necessary to emigrate, which they did in the direction of the Dutch colony of what is now New York. Peter Stuyvesant, the Dutch governor, did not entirely approve of their settling among his people, and ordered them to leave. But the Jews had evidently taken the precaution to assure their being received – if not welcomed – because upon revoking the order of Stuyvesant, the directors gave as one of the reasons for the Jews being received, “the large amount of capital that they have invested in shares of the company.” Nevertheless, they were forbidden to enter public service and to open retail shops, which had the effect of driving them into foreign trade, in which they were soon exercising all but a monopoly because of their European connections.

This is only one of the thousand illustrations that can be given of the resourcefulness of the Jew. Forbid him in one direction and he will excel in another. When he was forbidden to deal in newclothes, he sold old clothes – that was the beginning of the organized traffic in second-hand clothing. When he was forbidden to deal in merchandise, he dealt in waste – the Jew is the originator of the waste product business of the world; he was the originator of the salvage system; he found wealth in the debris of civilization. He taught people how to use old rags; how to clean old feathers; how to use gallnuts and rabbit skins. He has always had a taste for the fur trade, which he now controls, and to him is due the multitude of common skins, which now pass under various alluring trade names as furs of high origin.

Unwittingly, old Peter Stuyvesant compelled the Jews to make New York the principal port of America, and though a majority of New York Jews had fled to Philadelphia at the time of the American Revolution, most of them returned to New York at the earliest opportunity – instinct seeming to make them aware that New York was to be their principal paradise of gain. And so it has proved. New York is the greatest center of Jewish population in the world. It is the gateway where the bulk of American imports and exports are taxed, and where practically all the business done in America pays tribute to the masters of money. The very land of the city is the holdings of the Jews.

No wonder that Jewish writers, viewing this unprecedented prosperity; this unchecked growth in wealth and power, exclaim enthusiastically that the United States is the “Promised Land” foretold by the prophets, and New York the “New Jerusalem.” Some have gone even further and described the peaks of the Rocky Mountains as “the mountains of Zion,” and with reason too, if the mining and coastal wealth of the Jews is considered. In the time of George Washington there were about 4000 Jews in this country, most of them well-to-do traders. They favored the American side and helped the revolutionary colonies out with loans at critical moments. In fifty years the traceable increase in the Jewish population of the United States was more than 3,300,000. What it is today no man can estimate with any hope of accuracy.

To make a list of the lines of business controlled by the Jews of the United States would be to touch most of the vital industries of the country – those that are really vital and those that cultivated habit have been made to seem vital. The theatrical business is exclusively Jewish: play-producing, booking and theater operations are all in the hands of Jews. This accounts for the fact that in almost every production today can be detected propaganda, sometimes glaringly commercial advertisement; sometimes direct political instruction. The motion picture industry; the sugar industry; the tobacco industry; 50% or more of the meat-packing industry; over 60% of the shoemaking industry; most of the musical purveying done in the country; jewelry; grain; cotton; oil; steel; magazine authorship; newspaper distribution; the liquor business and the loan business. These – to name only the industries with national and international sweep – are in control of the Jews of the United States, either alone or in association with Jews overseas.

The American people would be vastly surprised if they could see a line-up of some of the “American” businessmen who hold up our commercial prestige overseas. They are mostly Jews. This may throw a sidelight in the regard to which “American business methods” are held in some parts of the world. When many different races of people can carry on business under the name “American” – and do it legally too – it is not surprising that Americans do not recognize some of the descriptions of American methods that appear in the foreign press. If the reputation of American business has suffered, it is because something other than American methods has been used under the American name.

Instances of Jewish prosperity in the United States are commonplace, but prosperity, the just reward of foresight and application, is not to be confounded with control. It would be impossible for any Gentile coalition under similar circumstances to attain the control that the Jews have won, for the reason that there is lacking in the Gentile a certain quality of working together; a certain conspiracy of objective, and the adhesiveness of intense racism, which characterizes the Jew. It is nothing to a Gentile that another man is a Gentile; it is next to everything to a Jew that the man at his door is another Jew.

The international Jewish plan to move their money market to the United States was what the American people did not want. We have the warnings of history as to what this means. It has meant in turn that Spain, Venice, Germany or Great Britain received the blame or suspicion of the world for what the Jewish financiers have done. It is a most important consideration that most of the national animosities that exist today arose out of resentment against what Jewish money/power did under the camouflage of national names. “The British did this”; “The Germans did this”; when it was the international Jew who did it, the nations being but the marked spaces on his checkerboard.

Today, around the world, the blaming word is heard, “The United States did this.” If it were not for the United States, the world would be in a better shape. The Americans are a sordid, greedy, cruel people. Why? Because the Jewish money/power is centered here and is making money out of both our immunity and Europe’s distress, playing one against the other; and because so many so-called “American businessmen” abroad today are not Americans at all – they are Jews. American citizens wake up daily to find that even the white nations are hardly allowed to see each other nowadays – except through Jewish eyes. Great Britain and France seldom see a special American spokesman who is not a Jew. That may be the reason why they reciprocate by sending Jews to us, thinking perhaps that we prefer them...

Here's an article I recently read as to the Russian threat on the Zionist State of Israel

The first three installments of the piece have now fallen behind the prerequisite of a subscription and are now therefore unavailable to non-paying readers.

Part 4 is currently on view in the 'free content' section, and will be the case approximately 24 hrs, 48 hrs tops.

Now after reading this, if you feel compelled, you may refer to me as an anti-Semite consumed with hate etc [ex: you're right I do think you're an anti-Semite...]

As I have already stated, I am not, what I am is a pro-black anti-Zionist who hates capitalist imperialism; if this does not suffice, so be it...I will lose no sleep over it.

* Pro-black as in equal world standing and opportunities for blacks.


Peace


Russian threat to the Jewish State - And then kick America out of the Eastern Hemisphere’s oilfields


Part 1

“When the end finally comes for Israel, it will all be over in microseconds. Flying faster than rifle bullets,the Sunburns will approach Tel Aviv and Haifa at twice the speed of sound, detonating in blinding white 200 Kiloton flashes designed to instantly transform animal vegetable and mineral into heat and light.”

During the Cold War of the sixties, the only thing stopping American or Russian psychopaths from taking over the entire world was the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction [MAD], where a multiple ICBM launch by America on Russia or vice versa, would automatically lead to a “doomsday” response by the nation under attack. Mutual destruction of both America and Russia was thereby guaranteed, resulting in nearly thirty years of unprecedented peace and quiet, caused solely by mutual nuclear fear.
About one month ago, Russia discreetly invoked MAD again, but this time in the Middle East in direct response to hysterical Israeli threats to nuke Iran with submarine-launched American Harpoon missiles. Quietly and with the minimum of fuss, Russia deployed its most advanced tactical nuclear missiles and crews to both Syria and Iran, thereby sending an unmistakable diplomatic signal that if Israel attacked Tehran or Damascus with nuclear weapons, Russia would in return instantly and anonymously vaporize the Jewish State.
This is not an idle or exaggerated threat. The Russian missile type deployed in Syria and Iran is the P270 Moskit [Mosquito], known in NATO circles as the SS-N-22 "Sunburn", once described by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher as "the most dangerous anti-ship missile in the Russian, and now the Chinese, fleet.” The ship borne version of this missile is launched from deck mounted quad tubes, but since Rohrabacher made his comments, Russia has adapted the Sunburn for submerged launch from submarines, air launch from Sukhoi 27s, and single surface launch from modified 40’ flatbed trucks. Nowadays, western defense experts unambiguously view all versions of Sunburn as the “most dangerous missiles in the world”.


Part 2

To see exactly how the Zionists drove us to this nuclear flash point, it is necessary to go back a few years to discover how the Jewish State managed to acquire sophisticated German submarine launch platforms, and American nuclear-tipped Harpoon missiles, thereby allowing a bunch of psychotic religious crazies in Tel Aviv to bring the Middle East, and perhaps the entire world, to the very brink of thermonuclear war.
Around 1989 Israel was trying to replace its obsolescent Gal-class submarine fleet, while simultaneously whining that it didn’t have the funds to do so. Predictably perhaps, the Jewish State was looking for a free hand out. Having failed to extract these big-ticket items as gifts from America, in 1991 Israel turned its sights on Germany, perpetually in moral debt to the Zionists because of the brilliantly managed and highly successful holocaust industry.
After a pathetically short period of Zionist arm wrestling in Berlin, Germany caved-in and agreed to build and provide the first two Dolphin class submarines free of charge, and extend a loan to Israel for the third. Naturally this loan was never repaid, meaning that German taxpayers had unwittingly funded Israel’s entire submarine fleet, custom-designed to launch nuclear-tipped missiles from specially designed torpedo tubes.
Obtaining the deadly American Harpoon missiles was relatively easy. For decades American taxpayers have unwittingly provided the Jewish State with enough free “expendable” munitions to crush the Palestinian people in their own country, and the Harpoon missile is classed as an expendable munition. What this means is that Harpoon falls into the same generic category as rifle bullets and hand grenades, so Washington went ahead and gifted the Jewish State with more than fifty nuclear-capable Harpoons.
The nuclear warheads for these missiles can be either American or homegrown Dimona products, but no matter which, Israel had to make it known that the nuclear capability was real, for there is no point making a nuclear threat if you cannot back it up with real nuclear muscle. This was achieved by leaking the information through high profile Israeli media assets, who initially plastered the information all over the Internet. This completed stage one of the exercise, which then had to be swiftly followed by a quasi-official statement of absolute deniability. Think about this one carefully people, think about it very carefully.
If Damascus or Tehran should suddenly turn into heat and light any time soon, the Israelis will instantly get the blame, in the first place because of their leaked high-profile threats, and secondly because of their known hatred of anything even remotely related to Islam or Arabs. We did not have very long to wait for this “on the record” deniability statement, which was issued less than 24-hours after the initial threats.
Former Israeli deputy defence minister Efraim Sneh claimed on Army Radio that, “Anyone with even the slightest understanding of missiles knows that the Harpoon can never be used to carry nuclear warheads”. This was swiftly reinforced by Ted Hooton, editor of Jane's Naval Weapon Systems in London, who agreed with Sneh’s assessment, saying problems with payload weight would put the Harpoon out of balance, limiting its range and accuracy, "It seems to me that a nuclear weapon, which is extremely dense, would make the Harpoon nose heavy and significantly reduce its range - in any event well below the (150 kilometers) it is designed for," he said.
While many might doubt the authenticity of Sneh’s claim, who would dare question the measured opinion of Jane’s, widely touted as the most authoritative military publication on earth? Unfortunately Jane’s appears to have made a terrible error, because Hooton’s claim is the exact opposite of reality. Harpoon normally carries a 215-pound conventional explosive charge in its warhead, which can easily be replaced by a 99.2-pound nuclear device, which then needs additional ballast to balance the missile in flight!


Part 3

Rest assured that the American-Israeli Harpoons are nuclear, and the Zionists have every intention of using them on Tehran and Damascus if they think they can get away with it. Dangerous people do dangerous things in dangerous times, and there is nothing more dangerous that a pack of religious fanatics with their backs to the Mediterranean, facing the imminent destruction of Zion. The Israeli economy is in tatters, Jewish migrants are fleeing Israel in droves, and the Zionist host [America] is fast running out of spare cash and free weapons.
Russia has known all about Israel’s nuclear forward planning for many months, and the only question the Kremlin faced was which deterrent to pull out of its vast nuclear arsenal and deploy in the Middle East. At the same time, Russia was equally determined to send very strong signals to America: signals also designed to make the Zionist crusaders think long and hard before they took any more aggressive action against the former Soviet republics and North Korea.
Deterrent choice for the Middle East was easy, because the Russians already knew the Americans were frightened of the SS-N-22, which the U.S. Navy actually tried to purchase from the Russian Navy in September 1995. In a letter reproduced at the bottom of this page, Vice Admiral Bowes wrote to Russian Commander in Chief Admiral Gromov, “I appreciate the opportunity to convey to you the United States Navy’s interest in acquiring all variants of the SS-N-22 ‘Sunburn’ Anti-Ship Supersonic Ship-to-Ship missile for test and evaluation”. America’s naked fear of this unstoppable weapon was thus laid bare, but Russia predictably refused to sell
If the Israelis decide to nuke Tehran or Damascus there is little doubt that some of their Harpoon missiles will get through, though probably only because of the element of surprise. The American-Israeli Harpoon is still vulnerable to defensive systems because it is a relatively old subsonic missile, powered by a small Teledyne turbofan engine. Detectable by radar, cruising relatively high at around 300 feet altitude, and with a range of only 65 miles, the Harpoon can be terminated by one of many different point defense systems. But regardless of these notable shortcomings, and as previously stated, some will reach their targets in Damascus or Tehran.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is when the real fireworks will start. Within seconds the tarpaulins will be thrown back on a number of 40’ flatbed trucks currently dispersed in classified locations, revealing the dull metal of the 37’ Sunburn launch tubes within. While the hydraulic stabilizer jacks slam into the ground and the launch tubes elevate to the firing position, Russian artillery specialists will confirm the pre-programmed target coordinates, then defer to central command fire control, at the same time retaining unit “dead man” authority to fire on bypass if absolutely necessary.
Each Sunburn will hurtle out of its launcher riding on the white-hot tail of a booster rocket, while its special ramjet lights and cycles up to full thrust. Then rapidly sinking back to an undetectable cruising altitude of approximately 60 feet, each missile will accelerate to Mach 2.2 [1,520 mph] in less than 30 seconds, with a total flight time from Damascus to Tel Aviv of around three minutes. When the end finally comes for Israel, it will all be over in microseconds.


Part 4

Flying faster than rifle bullets, the Sunburns will approach Tel Aviv and Haifa at twice the speed of sound, detonating in blinding white 200 Kiloton flashes designed to instantly transform animal vegetable and mineral into heat and light. If I was an Israeli general facing this doomsday response on my wife, my family and my synagogue, I would not launch any Harpoons at all, but then I am not a religious fanatic obsessed with killing Muslims and stealing their land. Unfortunately, reading the minds of certifiable lunatics is all but impossible, so the best I can suggest is that perhaps the Israelis will launch, and perhaps they will not.
Worst of all for the Zionists left alive in Washington and New York, is that if the Russians are obliged to launch their counter-strike against Israel, it will be one-hundred-percent deniable. Unlike Israel and its public threats to nuke Iran, Russia has not threatened anyone at all. Because Sunburn flies below the horizon it cannot be detected or logged by radar, and a 200-kiloton hole in the middle of Tel Aviv will yield no clues. Very likely the Russians will copy the Americans, and blame a fictional “rogue state” like Iran, Pakistan or North Korea.
The Sunburns deployed in Syria and Iran are not the only ones currently giving the Zionists recurring nightmares. Although the Russians refused to sell any SS-N-22s to Vice Admiral Bowes in 1995, they later made a very public sale of more than 100 Sunburns to the Chinese, who mounted them on frigates and corvettes, which they stationed near Taiwan. Thus by 2001, both the Russian and Chinese Pacific Fleets were fully equipped with 200+ Sunburns, each and every one of them easily capable of sinking an American aircraft carrier.
Ever since the illegal invasion of Iraq by America earlier this year , Russia has deliberately sent a number of unmistakably harsh diplomatic signals that the days of the Zionist crusaders are numbered, especially in the mid and far east, but predictably all of these signals have been deliberately suppressed by the western media. Russia’s bottom line is completely neutralizing America and Israeli in the Eastern Hemisphere, thereby preventing the U.S. from stealing Eurasia’s strategic oil reserves.
In late May while the illegal invasion of Iraq was in full swing, a small Russian fleet deployed to the Indian Ocean, uncomfortably close to American carrier battle groups transiting in an out of the Persian Gulf. This exercise, the first held by Russia in the Indian Ocean for more than ten years, was extremely uncomfortable for the American commanders, who knew that five of the Russian vessels, including three submarines, were fully equipped with nuclear-capable Sunburn missiles.
The diplomatic signal in the Indian Ocean was blatantly obvious. Though numerically inferior to the American fleet, the Russians had more than enough unstoppable firepower to win any sea battle outright. Billion-dollar American aircraft carriers became obsolete monoliths that day, as did America’s arrogant ability to roam the oceans of the world attacking smaller sovereign nations on Zionist orders. If America pushed too hard in Russian or Chinese spheres of influence, a 93,000-ton American aircraft carrier might “spontaneously” fireball in mid-ocean; in reality removed from the face of the earth by an unheard and unseen Sunburn missile, launched by a submerged Russian submarine more than fifty miles away.
In August and September 2003, the Russian and Chinese navies held large independent exercises in the Pacific, both coincidentally designed to, “Simulate sinking aggressive American carrier battle groups”. No prizes for guessing the name of the principal weapon system selected for this challenging task. During September, the Chinese missile destroyer “Fuzhou” fired a Sunburn with a practice warhead, which high-speed cameras then recorded striking the center of the white cross on the hull of the target vessel, located more than 60 nautical miles away from the firing point. Terminal attack profile was Mach 2.05 at an altitude of 22 feet.


That's it so far...btw, check out this article [in case you haven't seen it], again from mathaba.net on Tony Blair who was recently caught outright, lying about WsMD being found in Iraq, allegedly [is there anything you've ever said in your entire political life that isn't based on lies Blair?] hidden by the recently kidnapped Saddam Hussein for evil purpose.

Tony Blair "Bliar" Caught Lying Again - This Time by Bush's Man

From : Observer </news/>

Tony Blair was at the centre of an embarrassing row last night after the most senior US official in Baghdad bluntly rejected the Prime Minister's assertion that secret weapons laboratories had been discovered in Iraq.

In a Christmas message to British troops, Blair claimed there was 'massive evidence of a huge system of clandestine laboratories'. The Iraq Survey Group (ISG) had unearthed compelling evidence that showed Saddam Hussein had attempted to 'conceal weapons', the Prime Minister said. But in an interview yesterday, Paul Bremer, the Bush administration's top official in Baghdad, flatly dismissed the claim as untrue - without realising its source was Blair.

It was, he suggested, a 'red herring', probably put about by someone opposed to military action in Iraq who wanted to undermine the coalition.

'I don't know where those words come from but that is not what [ISG chief] David Kay has said,' he told ITV1's Jonathan Dimbleby programme. 'It sounds like a bit of a red herring to me.'

With the Government's policy on the existence of weapons of mass destruction in apparent disarray last night, insurgents inside Iraq yesterday launched another major attack, this time in the southern city of Karbala.

Four Bulgarian and two Thai soldiers were killed and 37 coalition troops were injured after Iraq's increasingly well-organised resistance attacked, using mortars, machine guns and a car bomb. At least seven Iraqi civilians were killed and up to 135 were injured in the attacks.

'It was a coordinated, massive attack planned for a big scale and intended to do much harm,' said Major General Andrzej Tyszkiewicz, head of the Polish-led multinational force responsible for security around Karbala. 'Four car bombs were used, grenade launchers and guns. In all cases, the suicide drivers were shot dead before they could strike their targets.'

Yesterday's offensive in Karbala marks the end of a disastrous Christmas week for coalition forces in Iraq following Saddam Hussein's capture a fortnight ago.

Last week guerrillas fired a rocket-propelled grenade at the Sheraton Hotel in Baghdad; lobbed mortars at the 'Green Zone', the coalition's riverside HQ; hit the Turkish, Iranian and German embassies; and killed four US soldiers in Bequba, north of Baghdad, using their favourite weapon: the remotely detonated roadside bomb.

A massive anti-insurgent offensive by US forces in Baghdad appears to have made little difference.

With confusion apparently growing between London and Washington over WMD, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Menzies Campbell said he would be pressing Ministers when Parliament returned in the New Year on what precisely the Government knew. 'It is high time the Prime Minister cleared this matter up once and for all,' he said.

Blair made his remarks in a pre-Christmas interview with BFBS, the British Forces Broadcasting Service, heard by the 10,000 British troops stationed in southern Iraq.

In recent days, senior Whitehall officials have raised the extraordinary possibility that Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction after all - but believed he did after being misled by his own advisors.

Luke Harding in Baghdad

Hey People,

Part 5 is to be found on mathaba.net so nip over there quickly and keep up with the report.

Also, here's a very informative site from the author of the mathaba reports [the first 4 parts of which are posted above] and a range of world wide events, good reading.

Following is an excerpt from one article from this site.


Peace


Israel's Blitzkrieg on Middle East Oil

"Operation Shekhinah a.k.a. Operation Iraqi Freedom"


On 21 March 2003, the British and Australian Special Air Services Regiments [SAS] were unwittingly tasked with protecting “Israeli Assets” H2 and H3 in Iraq’s Western Desert. Their British and Australian political masters stood these elite troops into clear and present danger, without ever explaining the real reason for their presence.
When Part One of Operation Shekhinah was first published in January 2002, it was viewed by many as a work of complete fiction. “Where is the proof,” my mainly Jewish critics asked, “that Israel intends to illegally invade Iraq and steal its strategic oil reserves?”
At the time, I asked everyone to examine the evidence and reach their own conclusions, because I was not yet ready to divulge the fact that this critical intelligence was sourced directly from the offices of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. I had every intention of living long enough to write this sequel, an ambition that may have been thwarted by Israel if I had revealed my source at that early stage.
Those readers wishing to review part one should click on the links at the top or bottom of this page, but in summary, the March 2001 Israeli operational planning envisaged a lightning strike on southern Iraq, followed by captured oil supplies being back-flowed to Haifa via the existing Trans Arabian Pipeline [Tapline].
Possible protests by the “International Community” about the Blitzkrieg were to be stifled by the Zionist-controlled media in New York and Washington, DC, who would explain patiently that this was merely a surgical strike against the “Evil Tyrant Saddam Hussein”.
Shekhinah planning accelerated through the northern summer of 2001, with a firm invasion date set for 2 October 2001, the first day of a seven-day Jewish holiday, and thus a most unlikely time to expect an Israeli attack. Then, as if from nowhere, the Zionist-banking center in New York was razed to the ground on 11 September 2001.
At a single stroke, the World Trade Center attack removed Shek